Literature DB >> 19195695

Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

Umberto Capitanio1, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Luc Valiquette, Paul Perrotte, Claudio Jeldres, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Gallina, Nazareno Suardi, Andrea Cestari, Giorgio Guazzoni, Andrea Salonia, Francesco Montorsi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect the number of biopsy cores taken has on the rate of clinically significant Gleason sum upgrading (GSU) in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
METHODS: We analyzed the data from 301 patients with low-risk prostate cancer (clinical Stage T1c-T2a, prostate-specific antigen <or=10 ng/mL, and biopsy Gleason sum <or=6) who underwent an extended (>or=10-core) prostate biopsy. Prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum, prostate volume, year of diagnosis, number of biopsy cores taken, and number of positive cores were used as predictors in logistic regression models addressing the rate of clinically significant GSU (defined as upgrading from biopsy Gleason sum 5-6 to radical prostatectomy Gleason sum of >or=7). Regression coefficients were used to estimate the predictive accuracy of individual variables, as well as their combined effect in the prediction of GSU.
RESULTS: The median number of biopsy cores taken was 18. Upgrading was recorded in 96 (31.9%). In men assessed with 10-12 cores, the rate of GSU was 47.9% compared with 23.5% if >18 cores were taken (P < .001). In multivariate analyses, the consideration of the variable defining the number of cores added 9.0% (P < .001) to the ability to predict GSU.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low-risk prostate cancer assessed with fewer biopsy cores are at a substantially greater risk of GSU. The number of biopsy cores taken represents one of the foremost predictors of GSU and should be taken into consideration during clinical decision-making in patients who are candidates for watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19195695     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  30 in total

Review 1.  Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Othman Mustafa; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

3.  Impact of immediate TRUS rebiopsy in a patient cohort considering active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andre C King; Andrew Livermore; Timo A J Laurila; Wei Huang; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 4.  Prostate cancer in 2010: GSU: misclassification or biological progression?

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Nazareno Suardi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Prostate Biopsy in Active Surveillance Protocols: Immediate Re-biopsy and Timing of Subsequent Biopsies.

Authors:  Jonathan H Wang; Tracy M Downs; E Jason Abel; Kyle A Richards; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Predictors of Gleason Score (GS) upgrading on subsequent prostatectomy: a single Institution study in a cohort of patients with GS 6.

Authors:  Vikas Mehta; Kevin Rycyna; Bart M M Baesens; Güliz A Barkan; Gladell P Paner; Robert C Flanigan; Eva M Wojcik; Girish Venkataraman
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2012-07-29

7.  Predicting the risk of harboring high-grade disease for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer scored as Gleason ≤ 6 on biopsy cores.

Authors:  Thomas Seisen; Françoise Roudot-Thoraval; Pierre Olivier Bosset; Aurélien Beaugerie; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Claude-Clément Abbou; Alexandre De La Taille; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Preoperative low serum testosterone is associated with high-grade prostate cancer and an increased Gleason score upgrading.

Authors:  A Pichon; Y Neuzillet; H Botto; J-P Raynaud; C Radulescu; V Molinié; J-M Herve; T Lebret
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  The Modulating Effects of Benign Prostate Enlargement Medications on Upgrading Predictors in Patients with Gleason 6 at Biopsy.

Authors:  Seyed Behzad Jazayeri; Young S Kwon; Russell McBride; Michael Leapman; Shemille Collingwood; Adele Hobbs; David B Samadi
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-05-30

10.  Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Rishi Nayyar; Prabhjot Singh; Narmada P Gupta; Ashok K Hemal; Prem N Dogra; Amlesh Seth; Rajeev Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.