Literature DB >> 20029401

Upgrading of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers on biopsy after prostatectomy in the low and intermediate tPSA range.

D Colleselli1, A E Pelzer, E Steiner, S Ongarello, G Schaefer, G Bartsch, C Schwentner.   

Abstract

When offering watchful waiting or active monitoring protocols to prostate cancer (PCa) patients, differentiation between Gleason scores (GS) 6 and 7 at biopsy is important. However, upgrading after prostatectomy is common. We investigated the impact of different PSA levels on misclassification in the PSA range of 2-3.9 and 4-10 ng ml(-1). A total of 448 patients with GS 6 PCa on prostate biopsy were evaluated by comparing biopsy and prostatectomy GS. Possible over diagnosis was defined as GS <7, pathological stage pT2a and negative surgical margins, and possible under diagnosis was defined as pT3a or greater, or positive surgical margins; the percentage of over- or under diagnosis was determined for correctly and upgraded tumors after prostatectomy. A match between biopsy and prostatectomy GS was found in 210 patients (46.9%). Patients in the PSA range of 2.0-3.9 and 4.0-10.0 ng ml(-1) were upgraded in 32.6 and 44.0%, respectively. Over diagnosis was more common than under diagnosis (23.2% vs 15.6%). When upgraded there was a significant increase in under diagnosis. As almost 40% of GS 6 tumors on biopsy are GS 7 or higher after surgery with a significant rise in under diagnosis there is a risk of misclassification and subsequent delayed or even insufficient treatment, when relying on favorable biopsy GS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20029401     DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2009.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  12 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer in 2010: GSU: misclassification or biological progression?

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Nazareno Suardi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Upgrading and upstaging in prostate cancer: From prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Carolina D'Elia; Maria Angela Cerruto; Antonio Cioffi; Giovanni Novella; Stefano Cavalleri; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-05

3.  Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Zhaoyong Feng; Bruce J Trock; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Gleason underestimation is predicted by prostate biopsy core length.

Authors:  Leonardo O Reis; Brunno C F Sanches; Gustavo Borges de Mendonça; Daniel M Silva; Tiago Aguiar; Ocivaldo P Menezes; Athanase Billis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Higher prostate weight is inversely associated with Gleason score upgrading in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Emerson Luis Zani; Leandro L L Freitas; Fernandes Denardi; Athanase Billis
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2013-10-31

6.  Prostate-specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL: A predictor of degree of upgrading to ≥8 among patients with biopsy Gleason score 6.

Authors:  Glen Denmer R Santok; Ali Abdel Raheem; Lawrence Hc Kim; Kidon Chang; Trenton Gh Lum; Byung Ha Chung; Young Deuk Choi; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-02-15

7.  The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yoichiro Tohi; Iori Matsuda; Kengo Fujiwara; Satoshi Harada; Ayako Ito; Mari Yamasaki; Yasuyuki Miyauchi; Yuki Matsuoka; Takuma Kato; Rikiya Taoka; Hiroyuki Tsunemori; Nobufumi Ueda; Mikio Sugimoto
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-22

8.  Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yuan Gao; Chen-Yi Jiang; Shi-Kui Mao; Di Cui; Kui-Yuan Hao; Wei Zhao; Qi Jiang; Yuan Ruan; Shu-Jie Xia; Bang-Min Han
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  A Multi-Center Prospective Study to Validate an Algorithm Using Urine and Plasma Biomarkers for Predicting Gleason ≥3+4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.

Authors:  Maher Albitar; Wanlong Ma; Lars Lund; Babak Shahbaba; Edward Uchio; Soren Feddersen; Donald Moylan; Kirk Wojno; Neal Shore
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  IVIM Parameters on MRI Could Predict ISUP Risk Groups of Prostate Cancers on Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Chun-Bi Chang; Yu-Chun Lin; Yon-Cheong Wong; Shin-Nan Lin; Chien-Yuan Lin; Yu-Han Lin; Ting-Wen Sheng; Chen-Chih Huang; Lan-Yan Yang; Li-Jen Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.