Literature DB >> 17533394

A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy.

A Takenaka1, R Hara, T Ishimura, T Fujii, Y Jo, A Nagai, M Fujisawa.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to elucidate the diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy for prostate cancer. We prospectively randomized 200 consecutive men into two groups to undergo systematic prostate biopsy. Overall positivity for cancer was similar (47% by transperineal and 53% by transrectal; P=0.480). However, in case with 'gray zone' PSA (from 4.1 to 10.0 ng/ml), significantly more cores were positive when approach was transperineal, especially among transition zone cores. Therefore, urologist preferences are sufficient for choosing an approach, except for a possible small advantage of transperineal biopsy when PSA is in gray zone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17533394     DOI: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  33 in total

Review 1.  The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Shen; Yu-Chun Zhu; Wu-Ran Wei; Yong-Zhong Li; Jie Yang; Yu-Tao Li; Ding-Ming Li; Jia Wang; Hao Zeng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Chemoprophylaxis during transrectal prostate needle biopsy: critical analysis through randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed M Elshal; Ahmed M Atwa; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohamed A El-Ghar; Asaad Gaber; Essam Elsawy; Abdelwahab Hashem; Yasser Farag; Hashim Farg; Ali Elsorougy; Mohamed Fouda; Hossam Nabeeh; Ahmed Mosbah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Transperineal biopsy of the prostate--is this the future?

Authors:  Dwayne T S Chang; Benjamin Challacombe; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Ultrasonography in prostate cancer: current roles and potential applications in radiorecurrent disease.

Authors:  James S Rosoff; Sandip M Prasad; Stephen J Savage
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Six-core versus twelve-core prostate biopsy: a retrospective study comparing accuracy, oncological outcomes and safety.

Authors:  W Mohammed; N F Davis; S Elamin; P Ahern; C M Brady; P Sweeney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Prostate cancer: A valuable tool for prediction of repeat biopsy pathology.

Authors:  Pierre Karakiewicz; Sebastiano Nazzani
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Infectious complications of prostate biopsy: winning battles but not war.

Authors:  Okan Derin; Limírio Fonseca; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in the era of increasing fluoroquinolone resistance: prophylaxis with single-dose ertapenem.

Authors:  Michael Seitz; Christian Stief; Raphaela Waidelich; Markus Bader; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men.

Authors:  Shivani Pahwa; Nicholas K Schiltz; Lee E Ponsky; Ziang Lu; Mark A Griswold; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Prospective evaluation of the safety of transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy based on adverse events.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Satoshi Fukasawa; Atsushi Komaru; Masayuki Kobayashi; Yusuke Imamura; Takayuki Ohzeki; Kimiaki Takagi; Yosuke Sato; Koichiro Akakura; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Takeshi Ueda
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.