Literature DB >> 25274099

No difference in anterior knee pain after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with or without patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Eun-Kyoo Song1, Ju-Kwon Park1, Chan-Hee Park1, Min-Cheol Kim1, Pranav R Agrawal1, Jong Keun Seon2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to compare functional outcomes of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PF OA) and those without PF OA and to evaluate the effect of PF OA on functional outcomes after UKA.
METHODS: The outcomes of 48 knees in patients without PF OA who underwent medial UKA (non-PF OA group) were compared to the outcomes of 57 knees in patients with PF OA [Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade ≤ 2] who underwent medial UKA (PF OA group) with a median follow-up of 5.4 years (range 3.1-10.2 years). Clinical outcomes including anterior knee pain, HSS scores, radiological parameters, and the progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis were compared, and their effects on functional outcomes were evaluated at the final follow-up visits.
RESULTS: At final follow-up visits, no significant inter-group difference was found in terms of anterior knee pain (1.9 vs. 1.9 in non-PF OA and PF OA groups, respectively), HSS score, or range of motion. Preoperative anterior knee pain and patellofemoral joint degeneration were found to be unrelated to poor outcome in patients that underwent medial UKA. Furthermore, no correlation was found between any functional outcome variable and chondral lesion pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: The result of UKA for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis was excellent regardless of PF OA (K-L grade ≤ 2). Hence, the patients with medial unicompartmental OA combined with a moderate degree of anterior knee pain or patellofemoral arthritis should be viewed as appropriate candidates for medial UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcomes; Patellofemoral osteoarthritis; Radiological outcomes; Unicondylar knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25274099     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3367-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  22 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Bony and cartilaginous anatomy of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  K Tecklenburg; D Dejour; C Hoser; C Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  UKA closely preserves natural knee kinematics in vitro.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Bilal F El-Zayat; Ronny De Corte; Yan Chevalier; Lennart Scheys; Bernardo Innocenti; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Luc Labey
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study.

Authors:  D W Murray; J W Goodfellow; J J O'Connor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-11

5.  Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Richard A Berger; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A new patellofemoral scoring system for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; John A Anderson; Piergiuseppe Zampetti; Helene Pavlov; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Hernigou; G Deschamps
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Scoring of patellofemoral disorders.

Authors:  U M Kujala; L H Jaakkola; S K Koskinen; S Taimela; M Hurme; O Nelimarkka
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome.

Authors:  D J Beard; H Pandit; S Ostlere; C Jenkins; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-12

10.  The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  D J Beard; H Pandit; H S Gill; D Hollinghurst; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-12
View more
  12 in total

1.  Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: no difference in progression of patellofemoral joint arthritis.

Authors:  Kwang-Jun Oh; Young Chan Kim; Jong Seong Lee; Yong Suk Chang; Gautam M Shetty; Kyung Wook Nha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Does Medial Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Influence Outcome Scores and Risk of Revision After Fixed-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Y Berger; S Ftaita; E Thienpont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Influence of the anterior notch in mobile-bearing UKA on patellofemoral radiotracer uptake and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Dietmar Dammerer; Michael Liebensteiner; Hannes Rochau; Christian Uprimny; Vinzenz Smekal; Ralf Rosenberger; Elvire Servien
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Journey-Deuce bicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the addition of computer navigation achieves good clinical outcomes and implant survival at 10 years.

Authors:  Randeep S Aujla; Jennifer Woodhouse; Jay R Ebert; Michael Finsterwald; Christopher W Jones; Piers Yates; Peter D'Alessandro; David J Wood
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.114

5.  Update on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications and failure modes.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Alexander Antoniadis; Naeder Helmy
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-08-01

6.  Effects of contact stress on patellarfemoral joint and quadriceps force in fixed and mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hyuck Min Kwon; Jin-Ah Lee; Yong-Gon Koh; Kwan Kyu Park; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Return to sports after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with concomitant patella-femoral osteoarthritis: multicenter retrospective cohort study with minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Massoni Carlo; Casciano Eduardo; Basile Attilio; Zanini Antonio; Bettinsoli Pierfrancesco; Marconi Alessandro; Maiotti Marco; Russo Raffaele; Amato Massimiliano; Santoro Giuseppe; Marco Spoliti; Riccardo Maria Lanzetti
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-15

8.  The comparison of anterior knee pain in severe and non severe arthritis of the lateral facet of the patella following a mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Boonchana Pongcharoen; Chaivet Reutiwarangkoon
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-27

9.  Does location of patellofemoral chondral lesion influence outcome after Oxford medial compartmental knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  S Konan; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Glycosaminoglycan Content of the Lateral Compartment Cartilage in Knees Conforming to the Indications for Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fu-Yin Wan; Ju-An Yue; Wan-Shou Guo; Lu-Yao Ma; Ran Yan; Qi-Dong Zhang; Li-Ming Cheng
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.