Literature DB >> 29246134

Influence of the anterior notch in mobile-bearing UKA on patellofemoral radiotracer uptake and clinical outcome.

Dietmar Dammerer1, Michael Liebensteiner2, Hannes Rochau2, Christian Uprimny3, Vinzenz Smekal4, Ralf Rosenberger5, Elvire Servien6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported that in partial knee arthroplasty smooth transitions to the remaining native parts of the knee are important. However, in mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) it is mandatory to create an anterior osteochondral notch adjacent to the femoral component to get clearance for the anterior lip of the bearing in full knee extension. This notch is, however, part of the femoral trochlea. It was the aim of the study to test for a potential association between a) an obligatory anterior notch in mobile-bearing UKA located at the margin of the medial aspect of the femoral trochlea and b) postoperative patellofemoral joint (PFJ) bone remodelling and discomfort.
METHODS: In patients who underwent routine mobile-bearing UKA (11 male, 13 female; 64.5 years / IQR 14) the following parameters were prospectively determined i) size of the surgically created anterior notch, ii) knee score sensitive to PFJ disorders, iii) bone remodelling in the PFJ (radiotracer uptake in SPECT-CT).
RESULTS: Notch size was not correlated with radiotracer uptake at the PFJ. Similarly, no significant correlations were observed between radiotracer uptake (patella or trochleocondylar junction) and knee scores (KOOS or Kujala Score). Significant positive correlations were found between notch size and knee scores.
CONCLUSIONS: From the findings made in our study it is concluded that a larger size of the anterior notch in mobile-bearing medial Oxford UKA is not associated with increased osteochondral remodelling processes at the patella or the trochleocondylar junction. Neither is a larger sized notch associated with worse clinical PFJ outcome. Surprisingly, a larger notch was even associated with superior clinical outcome. The exact mechanism for this contraintuitive finding remains unclear but may be the basis for future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered in a public trials registry. Link: (9/12/2017) ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01407042 ; Date of registration: July, 26, 2011.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Notch; Patellofemoral; SPECT; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Unicondylar knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29246134      PMCID: PMC5732380          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1885-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  26 in total

1.  [The minimally invasive unicompartmental knee system "Preservation"First clinical results and analysis of complications].

Authors:  D P König; F Popken; W Herzberg; P Eysel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis.

Authors:  Roger H Emerson; Linda L Higgins
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Correlation of Uptake Patterns on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) and Treatment Response in Patients with Knee Pain.

Authors:  Geon Koh; Kyung Hoon Hwang; Haejun Lee; Seog Gyun Kim; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-26

4.  Contact pressures at osteochondral donor sites in the knee.

Authors:  P T Simonian; P S Sussmann; T L Wickiewicz; G A Paletta; R F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Assessment of in vivo loading history of the patellofemoral joint: a study combining patellar position, tilt, alignment and bone SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Stephan N Schön; Faik K Afifi; Helmut Rasch; Felix Amsler; Niklaus F Friederich; Markus P Arnold; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Minimally invasive Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty in a patellectomized patient.

Authors:  Hee-Nee Pang; Gerard Ee; Ngai-Nung Lo; Seng-Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Richard A Berger; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Hernigou; G Deschamps
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Assessment of the loading history of patients after high tibial osteotomy using SPECT/CT--a new diagnostic tool and algorithm.

Authors:  Armin Mucha; Milos Dordevic; Enrique A Testa; Helmut Rasch; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  T Van den Wyngaert; K Strobel; W U Kampen; T Kuwert; W van der Bruggen; H K Mohan; G Gnanasegaran; R Delgado-Bolton; W A Weber; M Beheshti; W Langsteger; F Giammarile; F M Mottaghy; F Paycha
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Anterior Impingement After Mobile-Bearing Unicomparimental Knee Arthroplasty-A Neglected Problem. A Clinical Report of 14 Cases.

Authors:  Timon Röttinger; Leonard Lisitano; Andreas Wiedl; Edgar Mayr; Heinz Röttinger
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-08-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.