Literature DB >> 12107311

Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty.

P Hernigou1, G Deschamps.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral complications (osteoarthritis and impingement) have been rarely reported after unicompartmental arthroplasty, and their long-term consequences are not known. The purpose of the present study was to analyze these complications following unicondylar arthroplasty.
METHODS: We evaluated the results of ninety-nine unicompartmental arthroplasties that had been performed in eighty patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The medial compartment was replaced in seventy-four knees and the lateral compartment, in twenty-five. All ninety-nine knees were evaluated with regard to patellar impingement and osteoarthritic changes on skyline radiographs after an average duration of follow-up of fourteen years (range, ten to twenty years). In addition, the seventy-seven knees (fifty-eight patients) that had not been revised were evaluated with use of the clinical scoring system of the Knee Society and specific questions regarding patellofemoral symptoms after an average duration of follow-up of fifteen years (range, ten to twenty years). The relationship between patellar complications (osteoarthritis and impingement) and the position of the femoral component was evaluated with use of lateral radiographs of the knee.
RESULTS: At the time of the most recent follow-up, twenty-nine knees had osteoarthritic changes in the portion of the patellofemoral joint opposite the compartment with the implant and twenty-eight knees had impingement of the femoral component on the patella. The knees that had impingement did not have osteoarthritic changes. Pain while ascending or descending stairs and pain on rising from a chair were noted more frequently in knees with patellar complications (impingement and osteoarthritis) (p = 0.02), and these symptoms affected the stair-climbing functional score. These symptoms were more severe in knees with patellar impingement than in knees with degenerative changes. One revision was performed because of patellar impingement. Patellar impingement was more frequent after lateral arthroplasty than after medial arthroplasty (p = 0.02) and was associated with placement of the femoral component too far anteriorly (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: After unicompartmental arthroplasty, the patellofemoral joint was affected by degenerative changes and patellar impingement. These complications appeared to have been mutually exclusive and affected the functional outcome of the arthroplasty. Patellar impingement affected the knee more severely with regard to both symptoms and the need for revision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12107311     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200207000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  23 in total

1.  Does primary or secondary chondrocalcinosis influence long-term survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty?

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Walter Pascale; Valerio Pascale; Yasuhiro Homma; Alexandre Poignard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Posteromedial compartment cement extrusion after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty treated by arthroscopy: a case report.

Authors:  Weon Yoo Kim; Mohamed Shafi; Young Yul Kim; Jin Young Kim; Yun Kyoung Cho; Chang Whan Han
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  S Kirschner; J Lützner; S Fickert; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Pre- and postoperative radioligical evaluation of knee joint endoprothesis. Orthopedist's view].

Authors:  F Mazoochian; C Glaser; A Fottner; S M Hauptmann; M Triantafyllou; C von Schulze Pellengahr; M F Reiser; V Jansson
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Effect of arthritis in other compartment after unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Mofidi; Bo Lu; Johannes F Plate; Jason E Lang; Gary G Poehling; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-16

6.  Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jared R H Foran; Nicholas M Brown; Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  [Revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  G Mohr; J Martin; M Clarius
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Common causes of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single-centre analysis of four hundred and seventy one cases.

Authors:  Mustafa Citak; Kathrin Dersch; Atul F Kamath; Carl Haasper; Thorsten Gehrke; Daniel Kendoff
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty for osteonecrosis or osteoarthritis.

Authors:  E Servien; P C M Verdonk; S Lustig; J L Paillot; A D Kara; P Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Preoperative pain location is a poor predictor of outcome after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 1 and 5 years.

Authors:  A D Liddle; H Pandit; C Jenkins; A J Price; C A F Dodd; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.