Literature DB >> 33974113

Journey-Deuce bicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the addition of computer navigation achieves good clinical outcomes and implant survival at 10 years.

Randeep S Aujla1,2, Jennifer Woodhouse3, Jay R Ebert3,4,5, Michael Finsterwald6,5, Christopher W Jones6,5, Piers Yates6,7,5, Peter D'Alessandro6,7,5, David J Wood7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report 10-year outcomes and survivorship in patients undergoing bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BCKA) using the Journey-Deuce prosthesis in a consecutive prospective case series.
METHODS: Between November 2006 and November 2009, 41 patients with a mean age of 69.6 years (range 51-86) underwent 51 bicompartmental knee arthroplasties with the Journey-Deuce knee prosthesis. All patients presented with symptomatic medial and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis, with intact cruciate ligaments and a preserved lateral compartment on plain radiographs and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Clinical assessment was undertaken pre-surgery and at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years post-surgery using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol Group 5-Dimension self-reported questionnaire (EQ-5D) and maximal active range of motion (ROM).
RESULTS: 30 patients (37 knees) were followed-up at a mean time of 11.4 years (SD 1.1; range 10.5-14.0). Eight patients (ten knees) were deceased and three could not be contacted at final review. No major component revision was performed. Pre-operative OKS 25.4 (SD 5.2; range 15-40), knee flexion 116.4° (SD 10.3°; range 100°-140°) and EQ-5D 70.5 (SD 19.9; range 25-95). 10-year OKS 43.5 (SD 4.1; range 32-48), knee flexion 127.3° (SD 11.1°; range 105°-144°) and EQ-5D 77.4 (SD 9.3; range 60-100). The OKS (p < 0.0001), EQ-5D (p = 0.024) and active knee flexion ROM (p < 0.0001) all significantly improved from pre-surgery to 1-year post-surgery, with no further significant changes in these scores between any post-operative time period up until 10 years. 32% (7/22) of tibial and 45% (10/22) of femoral components showed progressive radiolucencies between 2 and 5-year and 10-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest cohort of patients having undergone BCKA (with the Journey-Deuce prosthesis) with longest follow-up described in the literature. At 10 years, patients presented with significantly improved clinical outcomes, comparable to other surgical arthroplasty options. No major component revision was performed. Progressive radiolucencies were noted in 32% of tibial and 45% of femoral components without corresponding clinical signs of loosening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
© 2021. Crown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Bicompartmental; Journey-Deuce; Knee

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33974113     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06579-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  29 in total

1.  Zone 4 femoral radiolucent lines in hybrid versus cemented total knee arthroplasties: are they clinically significant?

Authors:  James I Huddleston; Jeffrey W Wiley; Richard D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Minimal incision surgery as a risk factor for early failure of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert L Barrack; C Lowry Barnes; R Stephen J Burnett; Derek Miller; John C Clohisy; William J Maloney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Complications after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty as compared with traditional incision techniques: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Holly Smith; Kelly A Lefaivre; J Rod Davey; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Early failure with the Journey-Deuce bicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A G Dudhniwala; N K Rath; S Joshy; M C Forster; S P White
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-21

5.  Comparative Efficacy of the Different Surgical Approaches in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic-Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pierre-Alban Bouché; Simon Corsia; Rémy Nizard; Matthieu Resche-Rigon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Patellar resurfacing versus patellar retention in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Riccardo Compagnoni; Paolo Ferrua; Stefano Zaffagnini; Massimo Berruto; Kristian Samuelsson; Eleonor Svantesson; Pietro Randelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Does Medial Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Influence Outcome Scores and Risk of Revision After Fixed-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Y Berger; S Ftaita; E Thienpont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N D Clement; D MacDonald; A H R W Simpson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Preoperative Patellofemoral Chondromalacia is Not a Contraindication for Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander J Adams; Gregory S Kazarian; Jess H Lonner
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Does greater knee flexion increase patient function and satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Brandon N Devers; Michael A Conditt; Miranda L Jamieson; Matthew D Driscoll; Philip C Noble; Brian S Parsley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.