BACKGROUND: Ongoing efforts to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have raised concerns that these exams may be overused, thereby subjecting patients to unnecessary risks and wasting healthcare resources. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to measure overuse of screening and surveillance colonoscopies among average-risk adults, and to identify correlates of overuse. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Our approach was a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data for patients 50-65 years old with no personal history of CRC or colorectal adenomas with an incident CRC screening colonoscopy from 2001 to 2010 within a multispecialty physician group practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured time to next screening or surveillance colonoscopy and predictors of overuse (exam performed more than one year earlier than guideline recommended intervals) of colonoscopies. KEY RESULTS: We identified 1,429 adults who had an incident colonoscopy between 2001 and 2010, and they underwent an additional 871 screening or surveillance colonoscopies during a median follow-up of 6 years. Most follow-up screening colonoscopies (88%) and many surveillance colonoscopies (49%) repeated during the study represented overuse. Time to next colonoscopy after incident screening varied by exam findings (no polyp: median 6.9 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 5.1-10.0; hyperplastic polyp: 5.7 years, IQR: 4.9-9.7; low-risk adenoma: 5.1 years, IQR: 3.3-6.3; high-risk adenoma: 2.9 years, IQR: 2.0-3.4, p < 0.001). In logistic regression models of colonoscopy overuse, an endoscopist recommendation for early follow-up was strongly associated with overuse of screening colonoscopy (OR 6.27, 95% CI: 3.15-12.50) and surveillance colonoscopy (OR 13.47, 95% CI 6.61-27.46). In a multilevel logistic regression model, variation in the overuse of screening colonoscopy was significantly associated with the endoscopist performing the previous exam. CONCLUSIONS: Overuse of screening and surveillance exams are common and should be monitored by healthcare systems. Variations in endoscopist recommendations represent targets for interventions to reduce overuse.
BACKGROUND: Ongoing efforts to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have raised concerns that these exams may be overused, thereby subjecting patients to unnecessary risks and wasting healthcare resources. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to measure overuse of screening and surveillance colonoscopies among average-risk adults, and to identify correlates of overuse. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Our approach was a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data for patients 50-65 years old with no personal history of CRC or colorectal adenomas with an incident CRC screening colonoscopy from 2001 to 2010 within a multispecialty physician group practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured time to next screening or surveillance colonoscopy and predictors of overuse (exam performed more than one year earlier than guideline recommended intervals) of colonoscopies. KEY RESULTS: We identified 1,429 adults who had an incident colonoscopy between 2001 and 2010, and they underwent an additional 871 screening or surveillance colonoscopies during a median follow-up of 6 years. Most follow-up screening colonoscopies (88%) and many surveillance colonoscopies (49%) repeated during the study represented overuse. Time to next colonoscopy after incident screening varied by exam findings (no polyp: median 6.9 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 5.1-10.0; hyperplastic polyp: 5.7 years, IQR: 4.9-9.7; low-risk adenoma: 5.1 years, IQR: 3.3-6.3; high-risk adenoma: 2.9 years, IQR: 2.0-3.4, p < 0.001). In logistic regression models of colonoscopy overuse, an endoscopist recommendation for early follow-up was strongly associated with overuse of screening colonoscopy (OR 6.27, 95% CI: 3.15-12.50) and surveillance colonoscopy (OR 13.47, 95% CI 6.61-27.46). In a multilevel logistic regression model, variation in the overuse of screening colonoscopy was significantly associated with the endoscopist performing the previous exam. CONCLUSIONS: Overuse of screening and surveillance exams are common and should be monitored by healthcare systems. Variations in endoscopist recommendations represent targets for interventions to reduce overuse.
Authors: Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Chyke Doubeni; Andrew K Sanderson; Paul F Pinsky; Dilhana S Badurdeen; V Paul Doria-Rose; Pamela M Marcus; Robert E Schoen; Elaine Lanza; Arthur Schatzkin; Amanda J Cross Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: K Robin Yabroff; Carrie N Klabunde; Gigi Yuan; Timothy S McNeel; Martin L Brown; Dana Casciotti; Dennis W Buckman; Stephen Taplin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ann G Zauber; Sidney J Winawer; Michael J O'Brien; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Benjamin F Hankey; Weiji Shi; John H Bond; Melvin Schapiro; Joel F Panish; Edward T Stewart; Jerome D Waye Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Jeffrey K Lee; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Jolanda de Boer; Bruce H Fireman; Joanne E Schottinger; Virginia P Quinn; Nirupa R Ghai; Theodore R Levin; Charles P Quesenberry Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Shrujal S Baxi; Minal Kale; Salomeh Keyhani; Benjamin R Roman; Annie Yang; Antonio P Derosa; Deborah Korenstein Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Andrew J Read; Arlene Weissman; Philip S Schoenfeld; Seema Saini; Stacy B Menees; Sameer D Saini Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Joseph C Anderson; John A Baron; Dennis J Ahnen; Elizabeth L Barry; Roberd M Bostick; Carol A Burke; Robert S Bresalier; Timothy R Church; Bernard F Cole; Marcia Cruz-Correa; Adam S Kim; Leila A Mott; Robert S Sandler; Douglas J Robertson Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2017-02-20 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Zachary Predmore; Jean Pannikottu; Ritu Sharma; Monica Tung; Stephanie Nothelle; Jodi B Segal Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Mark C Hornbrook; Ran Goshen; Eran Choman; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rosetti; Yaron Kinar; Elizabeth G Liles; Kristal C Rust Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Caitlin C Murphy; Robert S Sandler; Janet M Grubber; Marcus R Johnson; Deborah A Fisher Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Tarik Sammour; Andrew Macleod; Tim J Chittleborough; Raaj Chandra; Susan M Shedda; Ian A Hastie; Ian T Jones; Ian P Hayes Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 2.571