Literature DB >> 28836087

Early Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Model Using Gender, Age, and Complete Blood Count Data.

Mark C Hornbrook1, Ran Goshen2, Eran Choman2, Maureen O'Keeffe-Rosetti3, Yaron Kinar2,4, Elizabeth G Liles3, Kristal C Rust3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Machine learning tools identify patients with blood counts indicating greater likelihood of colorectal cancer and warranting colonoscopy referral. AIMS: To validate a machine learning colorectal cancer detection model on a US community-based insured adult population.
METHODS: Eligible colorectal cancer cases (439 females, 461 males) with complete blood counts before diagnosis were identified from Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region's Tumor Registry. Control patients (n = 9108) were randomly selected from KPNW's population who had no cancers, received at ≥1 blood count, had continuous enrollment from 180 days prior to the blood count through 24 months after the count, and were aged 40-89. For each control, one blood count was randomly selected as the pseudo-colorectal cancer diagnosis date for matching to cases, and assigned a "calendar year" based on the count date. For each calendar year, 18 controls were randomly selected to match the general enrollment's 10-year age groups and lengths of continuous enrollment. Prediction performance was evaluated by area under the curve, specificity, and odds ratios.
RESULTS: Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for detecting colorectal cancer was 0.80 ± 0.01. At 99% specificity, the odds ratio for association of a high-risk detection score with colorectal cancer was 34.7 (95% CI 28.9-40.4). The detection model had the highest accuracy in identifying right-sided colorectal cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: ColonFlag® identifies individuals with tenfold higher risk of undiagnosed colorectal cancer at curable stages (0/I/II), flags colorectal tumors 180-360 days prior to usual clinical diagnosis, and is more accurate at identifying right-sided (compared to left-sided) colorectal cancers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Area under receiver operating characteristics curve; Blood cell count; Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; Hemoglobin; Medical informatics computing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836087     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4722-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  32 in total

1.  Cancer screening - United States, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer: a guidance statement from the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Amir Qaseem; Thomas D Denberg; Robert H Hopkins; Linda L Humphrey; Joel Levine; Donna E Sweet; Paul Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Variations in hemoglobin before colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Inbal Goldshtein; Uri Neeman; Gabriel Chodick; Varda Shalev
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Karina W Davidson; John W Epling; Francisco A R García; Matthew W Gillman; Diane M Harper; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Ann E Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Douglas K Owens; William R Phillips; Maureen G Phipps; Michael P Pignone; Albert L Siu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Amanpal Singh; Nischita Reddy; Taylor S Riall; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-09

6.  Identifying patients with suspected colorectal cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Carol Coupland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Missed opportunities in early diagnosis of symptomatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Maite Domínguez-Ayala; Jonathan Díez-Vallejo; Angel Comas-Fuentes
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Development of a risk score for colorectal cancer in men.

Authors:  Jane A Driver; J Michael Gaziano; Rebecca P Gelber; I-Min Lee; Julie E Buring; Tobias Kurth
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Does diagnostic delay of colorectal cancer result in malpractice claims? A retrospective analysis of the Swedish board of malpractice from 1995-2008.

Authors:  Larsolof Hafström; Henry Johansson; Jon Ahlberg
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2012-06-18
View more
  19 in total

1.  Development and validation of a meta-learning-based multi-modal deep learning algorithm for detection of peritoneal metastasis.

Authors:  Hangyu Zhang; Xudong Zhu; Bin Li; Xiaomeng Dai; Xuanwen Bao; Qihan Fu; Zhou Tong; Lulu Liu; Yi Zheng; Peng Zhao; Luan Ye; Zhihong Chen; Weijia Fang; Lingxiang Ruan; Xinyu Jin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Artificial intelligence predicts lymph node metastasis or risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenta Kasahara; Kenji Katsumata; Akira Saito; Tetsuo Ishizaki; Masanobu Enomoto; Junichi Mazaki; Tomoya Tago; Yuichi Nagakawa; Jun Matsubayashi; Toshitaka Nagao; Hiroshi Hirano; Masahiko Kuroda; Akihiko Tsuchida
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Diversity in Machine Learning: A Systematic Review of Text-Based Diagnostic Applications.

Authors:  Lane Fitzsimmons; Maya Dewan; Judith W Dexheimer
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence applications for pediatric oncology imaging.

Authors:  Heike Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16

5.  Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Veronika Voronova; Peter Glybochko; Andrey Svistunov; Viktor Fomin; Philipp Kopylov; Peter Tzarkov; Alexey Egorov; Evgenij Gitel; Aligeydar Ragimov; Alexander Boroda; Elena Poddubskaya; Marina Sekacheva
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Developing a clinical decision support system based on the fuzzy logic and decision tree to predict colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Raoof Nopour; Mostafa Shanbehzadeh; Hadi Kazemi-Arpanahi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2021-04-03

7.  A diagnostic prediction model for colorectal cancer in elderlies via internet of medical things.

Authors:  Parvaneh Asghari
Journal:  Int J Inf Technol       Date:  2021-06-16

8.  Predictive Modeling of Colonoscopic Findings in a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Jade Law; Anand Rajan; Harry Trieu; John Azizian; Rani Berry; Simon W Beaven; James H Tabibian
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.487

9.  Prediction of findings at screening colonoscopy using a machine learning algorithm based on complete blood counts (ColonFlag).

Authors:  Robert J Hilsden; Steven J Heitman; Barak Mizrahi; Steven A Narod; Ran Goshen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Data mining-based model and risk prediction of colorectal cancer by using secondary health data: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hailun Liang; Lei Yang; Lei Tao; Leiyu Shi; Wuyang Yang; Jiawei Bai; Da Zheng; Ning Wang; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.