Literature DB >> 12118971

Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale.

.   

Abstract

This statement summarizes the current U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for colorectal cancer and the supporting scientific evidence and updates the 1995 recommendations contained in the Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 2nd edition. At that time, the USPSTF recommended screening for colorectal cancer with annual fecal occult blood testing, periodic sigmoidoscopy, or the combination of fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy but concluded that the evidence was insufficient to recommend for or against colonoscopy or barium enema. The complete USPSTF recommendation and rationale statement on this topic, which includes a brief review of the supporting evidence, is available through the USPSTF Web site (http://www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov), the National Guideline Clearinghouse (http://www.guideline.gov), and in print through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publications Clearinghouse (telephone, 800-358-9295; e-mail, ahrqpubs@ahrq.gov). The complete information on which this statement is based, including tables and references, is available in the accompanying article in this issue and in the summary of the evidence and systematic evidence review on the Web sites already mentioned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12118971     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  190 in total

Review 1.  Protagonist: population based endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W S Atkin; J M A Northover
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Effect of tribal language use on colorectal cancer screening among American Indians.

Authors:  Angela A Gonzales; Eva Garroutte; Thanh G N Ton; Jack Goldberg; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-12

3.  [Colorectal cancer in Germany. Means for prevention and early detection: implications for laiety and physicians].

Authors:  A Eickhoff; C Maar; B Birkner; J F Riemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  [The importance of rectoscopy and colonoscopy in Internal Medicine].

Authors:  A Eickhoff; J F Riemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Practice tips. Colorectal cancer screening in my practice.

Authors:  Michelle Greiver
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Use of preventive services by men enrolled in Medicare+Choice plans.

Authors:  Leo S Morales; Jeannette Rogowski; Vicki A Freedman; Steven L Wickstrom; John L Adams; José J Escarce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Expert commentary--virtual colonoscopy: utility as a screening test for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Michael L Kochman; Bernard Levin
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-01-26

8.  Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard Marshall; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-23

9.  Testing to prevent colon cancer: results from a rural community intervention.

Authors:  John M Westfall; Linda Zittleman; Christin Sutter; Caroline B Emsermann; Elizabeth W Staton; Rebecca Van Vorst; L Miriam Dickinson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Melissa Dicarlo; Ashish A Deshmuk; Heather B Fagan; Randa Sifri; Nora Katurakes; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Sendecki; Heidi Swan; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.