Literature DB >> 23175526

Sonar jamming in the field: effectiveness and behavior of a unique prey defense.

Aaron J Corcoran1, William E Conner.   

Abstract

Bats and insects provide a model system for integrating our understanding of predator-prey ecology, animal behavior and neurophysiology. Previous field studies of bat-insect interactions have been limited by the technological challenges involved with studying nocturnal, volant animals that use ultrasound and engage in battles that frequently last a fraction of a second. We overcame these challenges using a robust field methodology that included multiple infrared cameras calibrated for three-dimensional reconstruction of bat and moth flight trajectories and four ultrasonic microphones that provided a spatial component to audio recordings. Our objectives were to document bat-moth interactions in a natural setting and to test the effectiveness of a unique prey defense - sonar jamming. We tested the effect of sonar jamming by comparing the results of interactions between bats and Grote's tiger moth, Bertholdia trigona, with their sound-producing organs either intact or ablated. Jamming was highly effective, with bats capturing more than 10 times as many silenced moths as clicking moths. Moths frequently combined their acoustic defense with two separate evasive maneuvers: flying away from the bat and diving. Diving decreased bat capture success for both clicking and silenced moths, while flying away did not. The diving showed a strong directional component, a first for insect defensive maneuvers. We discuss the timing of B. trigona defensive maneuvers - which differs from that of other moths - in the context of moth auditory neuroethology. Studying bat-insect interactions in their natural environment provides valuable information that complements work conducted in more controlled settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23175526     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.076943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  12 in total

1.  Convergent evolution of anti-bat sounds.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Nickolay I Hristov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Fast sensory-motor reactions in echolocating bats to sudden changes during the final buzz and prey intercept.

Authors:  Cornelia Geberl; Signe Brinkløv; Lutz Wiegrebe; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Moth hearing and sound communication.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Takuma Takanashi; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Simultaneous measurements of three-dimensional trajectories and wingbeat frequencies of birds in the field.

Authors:  Hangjian Ling; Guillam E Mclvor; Geoff Nagy; Sepehr MohaimenianPour; Richard T Vaughan; Alex Thornton; Nicholas T Ouellette
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  HPLC-MS Analysis of Lichen-Derived Metabolites in the Life Stages of Crambidia cephalica (Grote & Robinson).

Authors:  Timothy J Anderson; David L Wagner; Bruce R Cooper; Megan E McCarty; Jennifer M Zaspel
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Early erratic flight response of the lucerne moth to the quiet echolocation calls of distant bats.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Andrew C Mason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparing acoustic and radar deterrence methods as mitigation measures to reduce human-bat impacts and conservation conflicts.

Authors:  Lia R V Gilmour; Marc W Holderied; Simon P C Pickering; Gareth Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Optimal predator risk assessment by the sonar-jamming arctiine moth Bertholdia trigona.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Ryan D Wagner; William E Conner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ultrasonic predator-prey interactions in water-convergent evolution with insects and bats in air?

Authors:  Maria Wilson; Magnus Wahlberg; Annemarie Surlykke; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Acoustic Aposematism and Evasive Action in Select Chemically Defended Arctiine (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) Species: Nonchalant or Not?

Authors:  Nicolas J Dowdy; William E Conner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.