Literature DB >> 25250744

What's behind the scenes? Exploring the unspoken dimensions of complex and challenging surgical situations.

Sayra M Cristancho1, Susan J Bidinosti, Lorelei A Lingard, Richard J Novick, Michael C Ott, Tom L Forbes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Physicians regularly encounter challenging and/or complex situations in their practices; in training settings, they must help learners understand such challenges. Context becomes a fundamental construct when seeking to understand what makes a situation challenging and how physicians respond to it; however, the question of how physicians perceive context remains largely unexplored. If the goal is to teach trainees to deal with challenging situations, the medical education community requires an understanding of what "challenging" means for those in charge of training.
METHOD: The authors relied on visual methods for this research. In 2013, they collected 40 snapshots (i.e., data sets) from a purposeful sample of five faculty surgeons through a combination of interviews, observations, and drawing sessions. The analytical process involved three phases: analysis of each drawing, a compare-and-contrast analysis of multiple drawings, and a team analysis conducted in collaboration with three participating surgeons.
RESULTS: Findings demonstrate that experts perceive the challenge of surgical situations to extend beyond their procedural dimensions to include unspoken, nonprocedural dimensions-specifically, team dynamics, trust, emotions, and external pressures.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings show that analysis of surgeons' drawings is an effective means of gaining insight into surgeons' perceptions. The findings refine the common belief that procedural complexity is what makes a surgery challenging for expert surgeons. Focusing exclusively on the procedure during training may put trainees at risk of missing the "big picture." Understanding the multidimensionality of medical challenges and having a language to discuss these both verbally and visually will facilitate teaching around challenging situations.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25250744      PMCID: PMC5578758          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  27 in total

Review 1.  The point of triangulation.

Authors:  V A Thurmond
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.176

2.  'Slowing down when you should': initiators and influences of the transition from the routine to the effortful.

Authors:  Carol-anne Moulton; Glenn Regehr; Lorelei Lingard; Catherine Merritt; Helen Macrae
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Cognitive metaphors of expertise and knowledge: prospects and limitations for medical education.

Authors:  Maria Mylopoulos; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  From random access opportunity to a clinical education curriculum.

Authors:  Paula Gubrud-Howe; Mary Schoessler
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.726

5.  Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; Michael J Zinner; David M Studdert; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  It's NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education.

Authors:  Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Decision making in laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, independent and blinded analysis.

Authors:  Sudip K Sarker; Avril Chang; Charles Vincent
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 6.071

8.  Learning from clinical work: the roles of learning cues and credibility judgements.

Authors:  Christopher Watling; Erik Driessen; Cees P M van der Vleuten; Lorelei Lingard
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Mapping surgical practice decision making: an interview study to evaluate decisions in surgical care.

Authors:  Ros Jacklin; Nick Sevdalis; Ara Darzi; Charles Vincent
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  The rules of the game: interprofessional collaboration on the intensive care unit team.

Authors:  Lorelei Lingard; Sherry Espin; Cathy Evans; Laura Hawryluck
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  7 in total

1.  What can we learn from a soft sister? A complementary lens to the systems engineering approach in medical education research.

Authors:  Sayra Cristancho
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Mapping a surgeon's becoming with Deleuze.

Authors:  Sayra Cristancho; Tara Fenwick
Journal:  Med Humanit       Date:  2015-07-20

Review 3.  Qualitative research essentials for medical education.

Authors:  Sayra M Cristancho; Mark Goldszmidt; Lorelei Lingard; Christopher Watling
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Putting the puzzle together: the role of 'problem definition' in complex clinical judgement.

Authors:  Sayra Cristancho; Lorelei Lingard; Thomas Forbes; Michael Ott; Richard Novick
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Eye opener: exploring complexity using rich pictures.

Authors:  Sayra Cristancho
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

6.  Lessons on resilience: Learning to manage complexity.

Authors:  Sayra Cristancho
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2016-06

7.  Drawing on drawings: Moving beyond text in health professions education research.

Authors:  Charlotte Rees
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2018-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.