Literature DB >> 17869199

Decision making in laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, independent and blinded analysis.

Sudip K Sarker1, Avril Chang, Charles Vincent.   

Abstract

AIMS: Correct decision making is pivotal and an integral part of surgical competency. To date there has not been an attempt to assess surgeons making decisions whilst operating. In our present study we aim to assess operative decision making by trainee and expert surgeons by using hierarchical task analysis (HTA) as a method to map out decision making in surgery.
METHODS: One hundred and forty live laparoscopic operations were prospectively analyzed, independently and blindly. The operations were compared to an operative HTA, and individual case reasons for deviations noted. Factors in the operating theatre which may influence the surgeons' decisions whilst operating were assessed using a checklist.
RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen elective and 21 emergency laparoscopic operations performed by 12 consultants and 14 registrars were analysed. Factors from the HTA and theatre environment checklists were categorised. Inter-rater reliability was k=0.95, k=1.00 for sub-tasks and tasks, respectively, and 0.98 between the surgeon and independent observer for the operating theatre checklist. From these data sets a psychomotor surgical decision making model was constructed. Face and content validities of the model were verified by experts in surgery and decision making.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic surgical decision making is a multi-faceted and intricate process. We have used HTA to map this process and we present a model in surgical decision making. By understanding the mechanisms and factors which influence this process we may use it for effective, focused surgical training. We aim to use and test our model also on open major complex surgery.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17869199     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  6 in total

Review 1.  Medical simulation in respiratory and critical care medicine.

Authors:  Godfrey Lam; Najib T Ayas; Donald E Griesdale; Adam D Peets
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  Thinking like an expert: surgical decision making as a cyclical process of being aware.

Authors:  Sayra M Cristancho; Tavis Apramian; Meredith Vanstone; Lorelei Lingard; Michael Ott; Thomas Forbes; Richard Novick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  When surgeons face intraoperative challenges: a naturalistic model of surgical decision making.

Authors:  Sayra M Cristancho; Meredith Vanstone; Lorelei Lingard; Marie-Eve LeBel; Michael Ott
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  What's behind the scenes? Exploring the unspoken dimensions of complex and challenging surgical situations.

Authors:  Sayra M Cristancho; Susan J Bidinosti; Lorelei A Lingard; Richard J Novick; Michael C Ott; Tom L Forbes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Defining decision making: a qualitative study of international experts' views on surgical trainee decision making.

Authors:  Sarah C Rennie; Andre M van Rij; Chrystal Jaye; Katherine H Hall
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Conscious monitoring and control (reinvestment) in surgical performance under pressure.

Authors:  Neha Malhotra; Jamie M Poolton; Mark R Wilson; Karen Ngo; Rich S W Masters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.