Literature DB >> 18424290

Mapping surgical practice decision making: an interview study to evaluate decisions in surgical care.

Ros Jacklin1, Nick Sevdalis, Ara Darzi, Charles Vincent.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Training surgeons in vital decision-making skills remains unstructured. We aimed to map a process of care from the perspective of surgical decision making and test whether it could be deconstructed into an accessible format for trainees.
METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 experienced surgeons by using symptomatic gallstones as a clinical exemplar. Data were analyzed by 2 independent reviewers to identify decisions, cues, and decision rules, with further thematic analysis of selected decisions.
RESULTS: Eighteen specific decisions were identified in 6 or more transcripts, with significant interreviewer reliability (Spearman's rho = .65, P = .004, n = 17, 1 outlier excluded). These were arranged to form a "decision map." Two main decision strategies were described.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified and mapped the decisions made in the care of patients with symptomatic gallstone disease. The interpretation of competency at any procedure should include the surgeon's ability to make appropriate decisions at all stages of patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18424290     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  11 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine in surgical education.

Authors:  Mary R Kwaan; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-09

2.  Thinking like an expert: surgical decision making as a cyclical process of being aware.

Authors:  Sayra M Cristancho; Tavis Apramian; Meredith Vanstone; Lorelei Lingard; Michael Ott; Thomas Forbes; Richard Novick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  When surgeons face intraoperative challenges: a naturalistic model of surgical decision making.

Authors:  Sayra M Cristancho; Meredith Vanstone; Lorelei Lingard; Marie-Eve LeBel; Michael Ott
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  [The impact of preoperative classification of expected intraoperative difficulties. A multicenter study].

Authors:  M Korenkov; M Gundlach; J Heimbucher; S Saad; H Troidl; H Zühlke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  What's behind the scenes? Exploring the unspoken dimensions of complex and challenging surgical situations.

Authors:  Sayra M Cristancho; Susan J Bidinosti; Lorelei A Lingard; Richard J Novick; Michael C Ott; Tom L Forbes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Impact of Robotic Surgery on Decision Making: Perspectives of Surgical Teams.

Authors:  Rebecca Randell; Natasha Alvarado; Stephanie Honey; Joanne Greenhalgh; Peter Gardner; Arron Gill; David Jayne; Alwyn Kotze; Alan Pearman; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

7.  Teamwork and team decision-making at multidisciplinary cancer conferences: barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  Benjamin W Lamb; Nick Sevdalis; Sonal Arora; Anna Pinto; Charles Vincent; James S A Green
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Defining decision making: a qualitative study of international experts' views on surgical trainee decision making.

Authors:  Sarah C Rennie; Andre M van Rij; Chrystal Jaye; Katherine H Hall
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  At the end: A vignette-based investigation of strategies for managing end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Tom W Reader; Ria Dayal; Stephen J Brett
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2020-09-09

Review 10.  Decision making in urological surgery.

Authors:  Hamid Abboudi; Kamran Ahmed; Pasha Normahani; May Abboudi; Roger Kirby; Ben Challacombe; Mohammed Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.