Literature DB >> 12796727

Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals.

Atul A Gawande1, Michael J Zinner, David M Studdert, Troyen A Brennan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known of the factors that underlie surgical errors. Incident reporting has been proposed as a method of obtaining information about medical errors to help identify such factors.
METHODS: Between November 1, 2000, and March 15, 2001, we conducted confidential interviews with randomly selected surgeons from three Massachusetts teaching hospitals to elicit detailed reports on surgical adverse events resulting from errors in management ("incidents"). Data on the characteristics of the incidents and the factors that surgeons reported to have contributed to the errors were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: Among 45 surgeons approached for interviews, 38 (84%) agreed to participate and provided reports on 146 incidents. Thirty-three percent of incidents resulted in permanent disability and 13% in patient death. Seventy-seven percent involved injuries related to an operation or other invasive intervention (visceral injuries, bleeding, and wound infection/dehiscence were the most common subtypes), 13% involved unnecessary or inappropriate procedures, and 10% involved unnecessary advancement of disease. Two thirds of the incidents involved errors during the intraoperative phase of surgical care, 27% during preoperative management, and 22% during postoperative management. Two or more clinicians were cited as substantially contributing to errors in 70% of the incidents. The most commonly cited systems factors contributing to errors were inexperience/lack of competence in a surgical task (53% of incidents), communication breakdowns among personnel (43%), and fatigue or excessive workload (33%). Surgeons reported significantly more systems failures in incidents involving emergency surgical care than those involving nonemergency care (P <.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Subjective incident reports gathered through interviews allow identification of characteristics of surgical errors and their leading contributing factors, which may help target research and interventions to reduce such errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12796727     DOI: 10.1067/msy.2003.169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  170 in total

1.  The Imperial Stress Assessment Tool (ISAT): a feasible, reliable and valid approach to measuring stress in the operating room.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Tanya Tierney; Nick Sevdalis; Rajesh Aggarwal; Debra Nestel; Maria Woloshynowych; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Do soft skills predict surgical performance?: a single-center randomized controlled trial evaluating predictors of skill acquisition in virtual reality laparoscopy.

Authors:  K Maschuw; K Schlosser; E Kupietz; E P Slater; P Weyers; I Hassan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Patient safety: a tool from Atul.

Authors:  Gerald Early
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

Review 4.  New technologies for information retrieval to achieve situational awareness and higher patient safety in the surgical operating room: the MRI institutional approach and review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael Kranzfelder; Armin Schneider; Sonja Gillen; Hubertus Feussner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Litigation costs of wrong-site surgery and other non-technical errors in orthopaedic operating theatres.

Authors:  W D Harrison; B Narayan; A W Newton; J V Banks; G Cheung
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Intelligent Emergency Department: Validation of Sociometers to Study Workload.

Authors:  Denny Yu; Renaldo C Blocker; Mustafa Y Sir; M Susan Hallbeck; Thomas R Hellmich; Tara Cohen; David M Nestler; Kalyan S Pasupathy
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Techniques aren't everything: Why conscientious well-trained surgeons make mistakes?

Authors:  R Bethune; N Francis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Involvement of surgical residents in the management of trauma patients in the emergency room: does the presence of an attending physician affect outcomes?

Authors:  Robert Cohen; Bruria Adini; Irina Radomislensky; Adi Givon; Avraham I Rivkind; Kobi Peleg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Intelligent Interruption Management System to Enhance Safety and Performance in Complex Surgical and Robotic Procedures.

Authors:  Roger D Dias; Heather M Conboy; Jennifer M Gabany; Lori A Clarke; Leon J Osterweil; David Arney; Julian M Goldman; Giuseppe Riccardi; George S Avrunin; Steven J Yule; Marco A Zenati
Journal:  OR 2.0 Context Aware Oper Theaters Comput Assist Robot Endosc Clin Image Based Proced Skin Image Anal (2018)       Date:  2018-10-02

Review 10.  Conflict management: difficult conversations with difficult people.

Authors:  Amy R Overton; Ann C Lowry
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.