Literature DB >> 25248755

Comparative analysis of canal transportation and centring ability of three Ni-Ti rotary endodontic systems: Protaper®, MTwo® and Revo-S™, assessed by micro-computed tomography.

Karen Vallaeys1,2, Valérie Chevalier3,4, Reza Arbab-Chirani3,5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to use high-resolution micro-CT to evaluate the effects of three Ni-Ti rotary endodontic instruments, Mtwo® (VDW, München, Germany), ProTaper® (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and Revo-S™ (MicroMega, Besançon, France), on canal transportation and centring ratio. Fifty-four mesial roots of extracted mandibular molars with an angle of curvature of 25-35° were randomly divided into three groups of eighteen. Each group was instrumented with a previously unused Ni-Ti rotary system. The final instruments used were #30/0.05 taper (Mtwo®), F3 #30/0.09 apical taper (ProTaper®) and AS30 #30/0.06 taper (Revo-S™). Teeth were scanned before and after instrumentation using micro-computed tomography with a spatial resolution of 20 μm to measure volume and shaping changes. All images were filtered to improve signal-to-noise ratio. To determine the perimeter of roots and canals exactly, images were segmented in each slice with an edge detection process. Canal transportation and centring ratio were evaluated at 1, 3, 5 and 7 mm from the end of each root. The method developed by Gambill et al. was chosen. ANOVA was conducted with the significance threshold set at p < 0.05. No statistically significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of canal transportation or centring ratio at any level. These systems give similar results with regard to the tested shaping parameters. Under the tested conditions and within the limitations of this study, these systems were able to produce centred preparations of curved canals with minimal transportation.

Keywords:  Canal transportation; Centring ability; Micro-computed tomography; Ni-Ti rotary instruments

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25248755     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-014-0176-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  24 in total

1.  Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.

Authors:  J P Pruett; D J Clement; D L Carnes
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 2.  Impact of nickel-titanium instrumentation of the root canal on clinical outcomes: a focused review.

Authors:  Edgar Schäfer; Sebastian Bürklein
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.

Authors:  E Schäfer; M Erler; T Dammaschke
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.264

4.  Effects of two nickel-titanium instrument systems, Mtwo versus ProTaper universal, on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Guobin Yang; Guohua Yuan; Xiaofei Yun; Xuedong Zhou; Bojin Liu; Hongkun Wu
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Fatigue resistance of rotary instruments manufactured using different nickel-titanium alloys: a comparative study.

Authors:  Gianluca Plotino; Luca Testarelli; Dina Al-Sudani; Gianlcarlo Pongione; Nicola M Grande; Gianluca Gambarini
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  Comparison of the centring ability of the ProTaper™ and ProTaper Universal™ rotary systems for preparing curved root canals.

Authors:  Carlos Menezes Aguiar; Pamella Bezerra Sobrinho; Fabíola Teles; Andréa Cruz Câmara; Jose Antonio Poli de Figueiredo
Journal:  Aust Endod J       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 1.659

7.  Effect of asymmetry on the behavior of prototype rotary triple helix root canal instruments.

Authors:  Franck Diemer; Jérome Michetti; Jean-Philippe Mallet; Robert Piquet
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Rahman Hashem; Angie Galal Ghoneim; Reem Ahmed Lutfy; Manar Yehia Foda; Gihan Abdel Fatah Omar
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Torsional profiles of new and used revo-s rotary instruments: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Bettina Basrani; Karina Roth; Geoffrey Sas; Anil Kishen; Ove A Peters
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of curved root canals after mechanical preparation with three nickel-titanium rotary instruments.

Authors:  Samia M Elsherief; Mohamed K Zayet; Ibrahim M Hamouda
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2013-06-25
View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Apical Transportation with the Use of Rotary System and Reciprocating Handpiece with Precurved Hand Files: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Mohammadian; Atefeh Sadeghi; Fatemeh Dibaji; Mona Sadegh; Zahra Ghoncheh; Mohammad Javad Kharrazifard
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2017

2.  Root Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Mandibular Premolars Assessed Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Iussif Mamede-Neto; Alvaro Henrique Borges; Orlando Aguirre Guedes; Durvalino de Oliveira; Fábio Luis Miranda Pedro; Carlos Estrela
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2017-02-14

3.  Increase in [corrected] the glyde path diameter improves the centering ability of F6 Skytaper.

Authors:  Giuseppe Troiano; Mario Dioguardi; Armando Cocco; Khrystyna Zhurakivska; Domenico Ciavarella; Lorenzo Lo Muzio
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

4.  Computed tomography evaluation of root canal transportation using ProTaper, Race and Sendoline rotary systems: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Eshaghali Saberi; Bita Aramesh
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-06-06

5.  Comparison of glide paths created with K-files, PathFiles, and the ProGlider file, and their effects on subsequent WaveOne preparation in curved canals.

Authors:  Linxia Zheng; Xiongfei Ji; Chengxi Li; Lulu Zuo; Xin Wei
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Apical Transportation of Mesiobuccal Canals of Maxillary Molars Following Root Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems and Hand Files: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment.

Authors:  Pegah Sarraf; Nazanin Kiomarsi; Farrokh Haj Taheri; Behrang Moghaddamzade; Fatemeh Dibaji; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2019-08-30

7.  Shaping ability of 2Shape and NeoNiTi rotary instruments in preparation of curved canals using micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Ibrahim Faisal; Rajab Saif; Mona Alsulaiman; Zuhair S Natto
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.757

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.