Literature DB >> 22527909

Impact of nickel-titanium instrumentation of the root canal on clinical outcomes: a focused review.

Edgar Schäfer1, Sebastian Bürklein.   

Abstract

Nickel-titanium (NiTi) root canal instruments have improved the technical quality of enlarging and shaping. These instruments have been shown to prepare even severely curved root canal with fewer procedural errors than traditional stainless steel hand instruments. While it would appear that these instruments might enhance clinical outcomes, very few studies have assessed their impact when used in primary root canal treatment. Clinical studies investigating the outcome of primary root canal treatment using nickel-titanium hand or rotary instruments were identified (MEDLINE database) using appropriate key words in an attempt to determine if there have been enhanced outcomes with these instruments. Evidence from one clinical trial suggests that (i) better maintenance of the original canal curvature and shape results in increased success rates and (ii) that ledging of root canals results in reduced success rates. Evidence from two studies indicates that the use of NiTi-either hand or rotary-instruments significantly increases success rates of primary nonsurgical root canal treatment compared with the use of stainless steel hand instruments, while three investigations failed to show any significant differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22527909     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-012-0066-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study.

Authors:  Edgar Schäfer; Udo Schulz-Bongert; Gabriel Tulus
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 2.  Radiographic evaluation of apical periodontitis and endodontic treatment results: a computer approach.

Authors:  D Orstavik
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 3.  Do procedural errors cause endodontic treatment failure?

Authors:  Louis M Lin; Paul A Rosenberg; Jarshen Lin
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Determining the optimal obturation length: a meta-analysis of literature.

Authors:  Michelle A Schaeffer; Robert R White; Richard E Walton
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Comparison of clinical outcomes using a nickel titanium rotary or stainless steel hand file instrumentation technique.

Authors:  Donald J Kleier; Robert Averbach
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2006-02

6.  A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques.

Authors:  Gary S P Cheung; Christopher S Y Liu
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Comparison of classic endodontic techniques versus contemporary techniques on endodontic treatment success.

Authors:  Chris H Fleming; Mark S Litaker; Larry W Alley; Paul D Eleazer
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Factors affecting the outcome of orthograde root canal therapy in a general dentistry hospital practice.

Authors:  Monika Marending; Ove A Peters; Matthias Zehnder
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-01

9.  Factors affecting successful prognosis of root canal treatment.

Authors:  T Matsumoto; T Nagai; K Ida; M Ito; Y Kawai; N Horiba; R Sato; H Nakamura
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  Incidence and factors related to flare-ups in a graduate endodontic programme.

Authors:  M Iqbal; E Kurtz; M Kohli
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.264

View more
  9 in total

1.  Shaping ability of two nickel-titanium instruments activated by continuous rotation or adaptive motion: a micro-computed tomography study.

Authors:  E Pedullà; G Plotino; N M Grande; G Avarotti; G Gambarini; E Rapisarda; F Mannocci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparative analysis of canal transportation and centring ability of three Ni-Ti rotary endodontic systems: Protaper®, MTwo® and Revo-S™, assessed by micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Karen Vallaeys; Valérie Chevalier; Reza Arbab-Chirani
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 3.  Root dentine and endodontic instrumentation: cutting edge microscopic imaging.

Authors:  Amre R Atmeh; Timothy F Watson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  In vitro comparison of gutta-percha-filled area percentages in root canals instrumented and obturated with different techniques.

Authors:  Ayca Yilmaz; Isil Karagoz-Kucukay
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2017-04-03

5.  Ex-Vivo Comparison of Torsional Stress on Nickel-Titanium Instruments Activated by Continuous Rotation or Adaptive Motion.

Authors:  Joo Yeong Lee; Sang Won Kwak; Jung-Hong Ha; Hyeon-Cheol Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Adoption of change in endodontic practice after an educational program: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Eva Wolf; Kerstin Leonard; My Vidigsson; Åke Tegelberg; Margaretha Koch
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-02-18

7.  Evaluation of complications of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students.

Authors:  Mothanna K AlRahabi
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.657

8.  Root canal volume change and transportation by Vortex Blue, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved root canals.

Authors:  Hyun-Jin Park; Min-Seock Seo; Young-Mi Moon
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2017-12-24

Review 9.  Torque Generation of the Endodontic Instruments: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sang Won Kwak; Ya Shen; He Liu; Hyeon-Cheol Kim; Markus Haapasalo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.