Literature DB >> 23551510

Comparison of the centring ability of the ProTaper™ and ProTaper Universal™ rotary systems for preparing curved root canals.

Carlos Menezes Aguiar1, Pamella Bezerra Sobrinho, Fabíola Teles, Andréa Cruz Câmara, Jose Antonio Poli de Figueiredo.   

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the centring ability of the ProTaper™ and ProTaper Universal™ rotary systems for preparing curved root canals, by means of preoperative and postoperative imaging of a cross-section of their coronal, middle and apical thirds. Twenty mesiobuccal root canals of human mandibular first molars with a degree of curvature ranging from 55° to 60° were randomly divided into two groups of 10 specimens each: Group 1, ProTaper™ rotary system; and Group 2, ProTaper Universal™ rotary system. The data were analysed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis and Student's t-test at the 5% significance level. The results showed that the differences between the percentages of the presence of deviation observed were not statistically significant. Both systems showed the capacity for producing centred preparations in curved root canals with low proportions of deviation.
© 2010 The Authors. Australian Endodontic Journal © 2010 Australian Society of Endodontology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 23551510     DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00276.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Endod J        ISSN: 1329-1947            Impact factor:   1.659


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of the Centralization of Root Canal Preparation with Rotary Systems.

Authors:  Daniela Siqueira Lopes; Mariana Albuquerque Veiga Pessoa; Carlos Menezes Aguiar
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2016-09

2.  Comparative analysis of canal transportation and centring ability of three Ni-Ti rotary endodontic systems: Protaper®, MTwo® and Revo-S™, assessed by micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Karen Vallaeys; Valérie Chevalier; Reza Arbab-Chirani
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Biomechanical preparation in primary molars using manual and three NiTi instruments: a cone-beam-computed tomographic in vitro study.

Authors:  A Manker; M Solanki; A Tripathi; M L Jain
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-09-05

4.  Assessment of Damage of Endodontic Instruments with Naked Eye and Optical Instruments.

Authors:  Antonela Šošić; Ivan Šalinović; Valentina Brzović Rajić; Ana Ivanišević Malčić; Silvana Jukić Krmek; Ivana Miletić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2021-06

5.  Wizard CD Plus and ProTaper Universal: analysis of apical transportation using new software.

Authors:  Daiana Giannastasio; Ricardo Abreu da Rosa; Bernardo Urbanetto Peres; Mirela Sangoi Barreto; Gustavo Nogara Dotto; Milton Carlos Kuga; Jefferson Ricardo Pereira; Marcus Vinícius Reis Só
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Root canal centering ability of rotary cutting nickel titanium instruments: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohan Gundappa; Rashmi Bansal; Sarvesh Khoriya; Ranjana Mohan
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-11

7.  Apical transportation of manual NiTi instruments and a hybrid technique in severely curved simulated canals.

Authors:  Aurenaila Nascimento Gonçalves; Matheus Franco da Frota; Emilio Carlos Sponchiado Júnior; Fredson Marcio Acris de Carvalho; Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia; André Augusto Franco Marques
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

8.  Centering and transportation: in vitro evaluation of continuous and reciprocating systems in curved root canals.

Authors:  Beatriz Vilas Navós; Carolina Bender Hoppe; Leticia Boldrin Mestieri; Daiana Elizabeth Böttcher; Marcus Vinicius Reis Só; Fabiana Soares Grecca
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.