Literature DB >> 25247405

High-spatial- and high-temporal-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR breast imaging with sweep imaging with Fourier transformation: a pilot study.

Curtis A Corum1, John C Benson, Djaudat Idiyatullin, Angela L Snyder, Carl J Snyder, Diane Hutter, Lenore I Everson, Lynn E Eberly, Michael T Nelson, Michael Garwood.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the results of sweep imaging with Fourier transformation (SWIFT) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for diagnostic breast imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from all participants under one of two institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant protocols. Twelve female patients (age range, 19-54 years; mean age, 41.2 years) and eight normal control subjects (age range, 22-56 years; mean age, 43.2 years) enrolled and completed the study from January 28, 2011, to March 5, 2013. Patients had previous lesions that were Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 and 5 based on mammography and/or ultrasonographic imaging. Contrast-enhanced SWIFT imaging was completed by using a 4-T research MR imaging system. Noncontrast studies were completed in the normal control subjects. One of two sized single-breast SWIFT-compatible transceiver coils was used for nine patients and five controls. Three patients and five control subjects used a SWIFT-compatible dual breast coil. Temporal resolution was 5.9-7.5 seconds. Spatial resolution was 1.00 mm isotropic, with later examinations at 0.67 mm isotropic, and dual breast at 1.00 mm or 0.75 mm isotropic resolution.
RESULTS: Two nonblinded breast radiologists reported SWIFT image findings of normal breast tissue, benign fibroadenomas (six of six lesions), and malignant lesions (10 of 12 lesions) concordant with other imaging modalities and pathologic reports. Two lesions in two patients were not visualized because of coil field of view. The images yielded by SWIFT showed the presence and extent of known breast lesions.
CONCLUSION: The SWIFT technique could become an important addition to breast imaging modalities because it provides high spatial resolution at all points during the dynamic contrast-enhanced examination. © RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25247405      PMCID: PMC4314289          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

1.  Projection reconstruction techniques for reduction of motion effects in MRI.

Authors:  G H Glover; J M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  The capital cost and productivity of MRI in a Belgian setting.

Authors:  C Obyn; I Cleemput
Journal:  JBR-BTR       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

3.  Consistent non-cartesian off-axis MRI quality: calibrating and removing multiple sources of demodulation phase errors.

Authors:  Youngkyoo Jung; Yogesh Jashnani; Richard Kijowski; Walter F Block
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Selection of a convolution function for Fourier inversion using gridding [computerised tomography application].

Authors:  J I Jackson; C H Meyer; D G Nishimura; A Macovski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Characterizing and correcting gradient errors in non-cartesian imaging: Are gradient errors linear time-invariant (LTI)?

Authors:  Ethan K Brodsky; Alexey A Samsonov; Walter F Block
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The use of active noise control (ANC) to reduce acoustic noise generated during MRI scanning: some initial results.

Authors:  M McJury; R W Stewart; D Crawford; E Toma
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Dynamic breast MRI: does lower temporal resolution negatively affect clinical kinetic analysis?

Authors:  Robert L Gutierrez; Roberta M Strigel; Savannah C Partridge; Wendy B DeMartini; Peter R Eby; Karen M Stone; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Combined T2* and T1 measurements for improved perfusion and permeability studies in high field using dynamic contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Cedric de Bazelaire; Neil M Rofsky; Guillaume Duhamel; Jingbo Zhang; M Dror Michaelson; Daniel George; David C Alsop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Simultaneous dynamic T1 and T2* measurement for AIF assessment combined with DCE MRI in a mouse tumor model.

Authors:  Melanie Heilmann; Christine Walczak; Julien Vautier; Jean-Luc Dimicoli; Carole D Thomas; Mihaela Lupu; Joël Mispelter; Andreas Volk
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  1 in total

1.  Rapid dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for small animals at 7T using 3D ultra-short echo time and golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Li Feng; Ricardo Otazo; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 4.668

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.