Stephen J Matzat1, Emily J McWalter1, Feliks Kogan1, Weitian Chen2, Garry E Gold1,3. 1. Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. 2. MR Applied Science Laboratory, GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA. 3. Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To compare T2 relaxation time measurements between MR pulse sequences at 3 Tesla in agar phantoms and in vivo patellar, femoral, and tibial articular cartilage. METHODS: T2 relaxation times were quantified in phantoms and knee articular cartilage of eight healthy individuals using a single echo spin echo (SE) as a reference standard and five other pulse sequences: multi-echo SE (MESE), fast SE (2D-FSE), magnetization-prepared spoiled gradient echo (3D-MAPSS), three-dimensional (3D) 3D-FSE with variable refocusing flip angle schedules (3D vfl-FSE), and quantitative double echo steady state (qDESS). Cartilage was manually segmented and average regional T2 relaxation times were obtained for each sequence. A regression analysis was carried out between each sequence and the reference standard, and root-mean-square error (RMSE) was calculated. RESULTS: Phantom measurements from all sequences demonstrated strong fits (R(2) > 0.8; P < 0.05). For in vivo cartilage measurements, R(2) values, slope, and RMSE were: MESE: 0.25/0.42/5.0 ms, 2D-FSE: 0.64/1.31/9.3 ms, 3D-MAPSS: 0.51/0.66/3.8 ms, 3D vfl-FSE: 0.30/0.414.2 ms, qDESS: 0.60/0.90/4.6 ms. CONCLUSION: 2D-FSE, qDESS, and 3D-MAPSS demonstrated the best fits with SE measurements as well as the greatest dynamic ranges. The 3D-MAPSS, 3D vfl-FSE, and qDESS demonstrated the closest average measurements to SE. Discrepancies in T2 relaxation time quantitation between sequences suggest that care should be taken when comparing results between studies.
BACKGROUND: To compare T2 relaxation time measurements between MR pulse sequences at 3 Tesla in agar phantoms and in vivo patellar, femoral, and tibial articular cartilage. METHODS: T2 relaxation times were quantified in phantoms and knee articular cartilage of eight healthy individuals using a single echo spin echo (SE) as a reference standard and five other pulse sequences: multi-echo SE (MESE), fast SE (2D-FSE), magnetization-prepared spoiled gradient echo (3D-MAPSS), three-dimensional (3D) 3D-FSE with variable refocusing flip angle schedules (3D vfl-FSE), and quantitative double echo steady state (qDESS). Cartilage was manually segmented and average regional T2 relaxation times were obtained for each sequence. A regression analysis was carried out between each sequence and the reference standard, and root-mean-square error (RMSE) was calculated. RESULTS: Phantom measurements from all sequences demonstrated strong fits (R(2) > 0.8; P < 0.05). For in vivo cartilage measurements, R(2) values, slope, and RMSE were: MESE: 0.25/0.42/5.0 ms, 2D-FSE: 0.64/1.31/9.3 ms, 3D-MAPSS: 0.51/0.66/3.8 ms, 3D vfl-FSE: 0.30/0.414.2 ms, qDESS: 0.60/0.90/4.6 ms. CONCLUSION: 2D-FSE, qDESS, and 3D-MAPSS demonstrated the best fits with SE measurements as well as the greatest dynamic ranges. The 3D-MAPSS, 3D vfl-FSE, and qDESS demonstrated the closest average measurements to SE. Discrepancies in T2 relaxation time quantitation between sequences suggest that care should be taken when comparing results between studies.
Authors: H E Smith; T J Mosher; B J Dardzinski; B G Collins; C M Collins; Q X Yang; V J Schmithorst; M B Smith Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sharon Balamoody; Tomos G Williams; Chris Wolstenholme; John C Waterton; Michael Bowes; Richard Hodgson; Sha Zhao; Marietta Scott; Chris J Taylor; Charles E Hutchinson Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Ernesto Staroswiecki; Kristin L Granlund; Marcus T Alley; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: S Apprich; G H Welsch; T C Mamisch; P Szomolanyi; M Mayerhoefer; K Pinker; S Trattnig Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Florian Schmaranzer; Larissa Arendt; Emanuel F Liechti; Katja Nuss; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Patrick R Kircher; Moritz Tannast Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Akshay S Chaudhari; Bragi Sveinsson; Catherine J Moran; Emily J McWalter; Ethan M Johnson; Tao Zhang; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: G B Joseph; C E McCulloch; M C Nevitt; U Heilmeier; L Nardo; J A Lynch; F Liu; T Baum; T M Link Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Feliks Kogan; Evan Levine; Akshay S Chaudhari; Uchechukwuka D Monu; Kevin Epperson; Edwin H G Oei; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-12-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jonathan I Tamir; Martin Uecker; Weitian Chen; Peng Lai; Marcus T Alley; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Michael Lustig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Akshay S Chaudhari; Marianne S Black; Susanne Eijgenraam; Wolfgang Wirth; Susanne Maschek; Bragi Sveinsson; Felix Eckstein; Edwin H G Oei; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 4.813