Literature DB >> 11436214

Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee.

H E Smith1, T J Mosher, B J Dardzinski, B G Collins, C M Collins, Q X Yang, V J Schmithorst, M B Smith.   

Abstract

Technical limitations imposed by resolution and B1 homogeneity have thus far limited quantitative in vivo T2 mapping of cartilage to the patella. The purpose of this study is to develop T2 mapping of the femoral/tibial joint and assess regional variability of cartilage T2 in the knee. Quantitative in vivo T2 mapping of the knee was performed on 15 asymptomatic adults (age, 22-44) using a 3T MR scanner. There is a consistent pattern of spatial variation in cartilage T2 with longer values near the articular surface. The greatest variation occurs in the patella, where T2 increases from 45.3 +/- 2.5 msec at a normalized distance of 0.33-67 +/- 5.5 msec at a distance of 1.0. These results demonstrate feasibility of performing in vivo T2 mapping of femoral tibial cartilage. Except for the superficial 15% where T2 values are lower, the spatial variation in T2 of femoral and tibial cartilage is similar to patellar cartilage. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11436214     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  110 in total

1.  Classification of sodium MRI data of cartilage using machine learning.

Authors:  Guillaume Madelin; Frederick Poidevin; Antonios Makrymallis; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Advanced MRI of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Hillary J Braun; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2011-10

3.  Association of magnetic resonance imaging-based knee cartilage T2 measurements and focal knee lesions with knee pain: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Gabby B Joseph; Ahilan Arulanandan; Lorenzo Nardo; Warapat Virayavanich; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Michael C Nevitt; John Lynch; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Baseline mean and heterogeneity of MR cartilage T2 are associated with morphologic degeneration of cartilage, meniscus, and bone marrow over 3 years--data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  G B Joseph; T Baum; H Alizai; J Carballido-Gamio; L Nardo; W Virayavanich; J A Lynch; M C Nevitt; C E McCulloch; S Majumdar; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Biochemical (T2, T2* and magnetisation transfer ratio) MRI of knee cartilage: feasibility at ultra-high field (7T) compared with high field (3T) strength.

Authors:  Goetz H Welsch; Sebastian Apprich; Stefan Zbyn; Tallal C Mamisch; Vladimir Mlynarik; Klaus Scheffler; Oliver Bieri; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: optimizing 3 Tesla imaging.

Authors:  Lauren Shapiro; Ernesto Staroswiecki; Garry Gold
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.800

7.  Image interpolation improves the zonal analysis of cartilage T2 relaxation in MRI.

Authors:  Farid Badar; Yang Xia
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-04

8.  Normal T2 map profile of the entire femoral cartilage using an angle/layer-dependent approach.

Authors:  Yasuhito Kaneko; Taiki Nozaki; Hon Yu; Andrew Chang; Kayleigh Kaneshiro; Ran Schwarzkopf; Takeshi Hara; Hiroshi Yoshioka
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Investigation of regional influence of magic-angle effect on t2 in human articular cartilage with osteoarthritis at 3 T.

Authors:  Ligong Wang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Sodium and T1rho MRI for molecular and diagnostic imaging of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Arijitt Borthakur; Eric Mellon; Sampreet Niyogi; Walter Witschey; J Bruce Kneeland; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.