PURPOSE: To assess the clinical feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with a mechanical loading system for evaluation of load-bearing function in knee joints using cartilage T2 as a surrogate of cartilage matrix changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sagittal T2 maps of the medial and lateral femorotibial joints of 22 healthy volunteers were obtained using 3.0T MR imaging. After preloading for 6-9 minutes, MR images under static loading conditions were obtained by applying axial compression force of 50% of body weight during imaging. T2 values of the femoral and tibial cartilage at the weight-bearing area were compared between unloading and loading conditions. RESULTS: Under loading conditions, mean cartilage T2 decreased, depending on location of the knee cartilage. For the femoral side a significant decrease in T2 with loading was observed only at the region in direct contact with the opposing tibial cartilage, in the medial femoral cartilage (5.4%, P < 0.0005). For the tibial side a significant decrease in T2 with loading was widely observed in the medial and lateral joint, at regions both covered and not covered by the meniscus (4.3%-7.6%, P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: MR imaging with mechanical loading is feasible to detect site-specific changes in cartilage T2 during static loading. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with a mechanical loading system for evaluation of load-bearing function in knee joints using cartilage T2 as a surrogate of cartilage matrix changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sagittal T2 maps of the medial and lateral femorotibial joints of 22 healthy volunteers were obtained using 3.0T MR imaging. After preloading for 6-9 minutes, MR images under static loading conditions were obtained by applying axial compression force of 50% of body weight during imaging. T2 values of the femoral and tibial cartilage at the weight-bearing area were compared between unloading and loading conditions. RESULTS: Under loading conditions, mean cartilage T2 decreased, depending on location of the knee cartilage. For the femoral side a significant decrease in T2 with loading was observed only at the region in direct contact with the opposing tibial cartilage, in the medial femoral cartilage (5.4%, P < 0.0005). For the tibial side a significant decrease in T2 with loading was widely observed in the medial and lateral joint, at regions both covered and not covered by the meniscus (4.3%-7.6%, P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: MR imaging with mechanical loading is feasible to detect site-specific changes in cartilage T2 during static loading. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Richard B Souza; Thomas Baum; Samuel Wu; Brian T Feeley; Nancy Kadel; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Thomas Baum; Christoph Stehling; Gabby B Joseph; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Christina Müller-Höcker; Michael C Nevitt; John Lynch; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Karupppasamy Subburaj; Deepak Kumar; Richard B Souza; Hamza Alizai; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Jang-Hwan Choi; Rebecca Fahrig; Andreas Keil; Thor F Besier; Saikat Pal; Emily J McWalter; Gary S Beaupré; Andreas Maier Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Gregory Chang; Ding Xia; Orrin Sherman; Eric Strauss; Laith Jazrawi; Michael P Recht; Ravinder R Regatte Journal: MAGMA Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: S Apprich; T C Mamisch; G H Welsch; H Bonel; K A Siebenrock; Y-J Kim; S Trattnig; M Dudda Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2011-11-06 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Sang Do Kim; Rebecca Jessel; David Zurakowski; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 4.176