| Literature DB >> 25242927 |
Forouzan Rostami1, Seyed Hadi Razavi1, Abbas Akhavan Sepahi2, Seyed Mohammad Taghi Gharibzahedi1.
Abstract
The interest in production of natural colorants by microbial fermentation has been currently increased. The effects of D-glucose concentration (3.18-36.82 g/L), inoculum size (12.5 × 10(9)-49.5 × 10(9) cfu cells/mL) and air-flow rate (1.95-12.05 L/L min) on the biomass, total carotenoid and canthaxanthin (CTX) accumulation of Dietzia natronolimnaea HS-1 in a batch bioreactor was scrutinized using a response surface methodology-central composite rotatable design (RSM-CCRD). Second-order polynomial models with high R (2) values ranging from 0.978 to 0.990 were developed for the studied responses using multiple linear regression analysis. The models showed the maximum cumulative amounts of biomass (7.85 g/L), total carotenoid (5.48 mg/L) and CTX (4.99 mg/L) could be achieved at 23.38 g/L of D-glucose, 31.2 × 10(9) cfu cells/mL of inoculation intensity and air-flow rate of 7.85 L/L min. The predicted values for optimum conditions were in good agreement with experimental data.Entities:
Keywords: Dietzia; batch bioreactor; microbial canthaxanthin; modeling; response surface methodology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25242927 PMCID: PMC4166268 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822014005000046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Experimental domain of central composite rotatable design (CCRD).
| Independent variables | Unit | Symbol | Coded variables levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| Uncodified | Codified | −1.682 (−α) | −1 | 0 | +1 | +1.682 (+α) | ||
| Glucose concentration | g/L | X1 | x1 | 3.18 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 36.82 |
| Inoculation intensity | x 109 cfu cells/mL | X2 | x2 | 12.5 | 20 | 31 | 42 | 49.5 |
| Aeration intensity | L/L min | X3 | x3 | 1.95 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 12.05 |
Experimental design with the observed responses and predicted values for the production of biomass, carotenoid and CTX using RSM-CCRD.
| Run | Independent variables | Biomass ( | Total carotenoid ( | CTX ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Experimental | Predicted | Experimental | Predicted | Experimental | Predicted | ||||
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 5.17 | 5.08 | 2.75 | 2.67 | 2.47 | 2.48 |
| 2 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 5.41 | 5.31 | 3.89 | 3.90 | 3.50 | 3.51 |
| 3 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 5.31 | 5.08 | 3.68 | 3.60 | 3.31 | 3.22 |
| 4 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 5.79 | 5.83 | 4.71 | 4.59 | 3.48 | 3.41 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 5.73 | 5.74 | 3.44 | 3.59 | 3.03 | 3.12 |
| 6 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 6.37 | 6.66 | 4.36 | 4.47 | 4.05 | 4.16 |
| 7 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 4.42 | 4.57 | 3.37 | 3.39 | 3.08 | 3.09 |
| 8 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 6.84 | 6.99 | 4.15 | 4.26 | 3.90 | 3.91 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.81 | 7.59 | 5.12 | 5.22 | 4.81 | 4.82 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.75 | 7.59 | 5.26 | 5.22 | 4.89 | 4.82 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.89 | 7.83 | 5.33 | 5.28 | 4.95 | 4.98 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.61 | 7.83 | 5.42 | 5.28 | 5.04 | 4.98 |
| 13 | −1.68 | 0 | 0 | 4.29 | 4.41 | 2.64 | 2.64 | 2.32 | 2.32 |
| 14 | 1.68 | 0 | 0 | 6.42 | 6.22 | 4.36 | 4.31 | 3.63 | 3.61 |
| 15 | 0 | −1.68 | 0 | 6.82 | 6.78 | 3.91 | 3.81 | 3.71 | 3.59 |
| 16 | 0 | 1.68 | 0 | 6.69 | 6.65 | 4.26 | 4.32 | 3.65 | 3.74 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | −1.68 | 4.42 | 4.68 | 4.03 | 4.20 | 3.36 | 3.45 |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 1.68 | 6.13 | 5.80 | 4.81 | 4.59 | 4.27 | 4.15 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.51 | 7.69 | 5.12 | 5.34 | 4.76 | 4.93 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.65 | 7.69 | 5.42 | 5.34 | 5.02 | 4.93 |
Mean of triplicate determinations.
ANOVA and regression coefficients of the second-order polynomial models for the response variables.
| Source | DF | Biomass ( | Total carotenoid ( | CTX ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Coefficient | Sum of squares | p-value | Coefficient | Sum of squares | p-value | Coefficient | Sum of squares | p-value | ||
| Model | 9 | 7.71 | 26.59 | < 0.0001 | 5.28 | 13.57 | < 0.0001 | 4.91 | 13.25 | < 0.0001 |
| Linear | ||||||||||
| β1 | 1 | 0.54 | 3.97 | < 0.0001 | 0.50 | 3.35 | < 0.0001 | 0.38 | 2.01 | < 0.0001 |
| β2 | 1 | - | 0.02 | ns | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.01 | - | 0.03 | ns |
| β3 | 1 | 0.33 | 1.52 | 0.002 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.59 | 0.0003 |
| Quadratic | ||||||||||
| β11 | 1 | −0.84 | 10.17 | < 0.0001 | −0.66 | 6.23 | < 0.0001 | −0.70 | 6.97 | < 0.0001 |
| β22 | 1 | −0.35 | 1.72 | 0.001 | −0.45 | 2.93 | < 0.0001 | −0.45 | 2.87 | < 0.0001 |
| β33 | 1 | −0.87 | 10.87 | < 0.0001 | −0.33 | 1.59 | 0.0001 | −0.40 | 2.29 | < 0.0001 |
| Interaction | ||||||||||
| β12 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.51 | 0.03 | - | 0.007 | ns | −0.13 | 0.14 | 0.01 |
| β13 | 1 | 0.29 | 0.68 | 0.01 | - | 0.02 | ns | - | 0.05 | ns |
| β23 | 1 | - | 0.23 | ns | −0.25 | 0.52 | 0.003 | −0.11 | 0.11 | 0.03 |
| Residual | 8 | 0.60 | 0.25 | 0.13 | ||||||
| Lack- of-fit | 5 | 0.55 | 0.077 | 0.19 | 0.305 | 0.08 | 0.460 | |||
| Pure error | 3 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.04 | ||||||
| Total | 19 | 27.42 | 13.84 | 13.45 | ||||||
| 0.978 | 0.981 | 0.990 | ||||||||
| Adj- | 0.953 | 0.961 | 0.980 | |||||||
| CV (%) | 4.34 | 4.13 | 3.24 | |||||||
| PRESS | 7.10 | 2.68 | 1.27 | |||||||
| ADP | 16.16 | 19.57 | 27.51 | |||||||
Figure 1Linear correlation between observed and predicted values for biomass, total carotenoid and CTX produced by D. natronolimnaea HS-1.
Figure 23D surface plots showing the significant (p < 0.05) interaction effects on the variation of the biomass (a and b), total carotenoid (c) and CTX (d and e) synthesized by D. natronolimnaea HS-1.
Predicted and experimental values of the responses obtained at optimum conditions.
| Independent variables | Optimum condition | Response variables | Optimum condition | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Experimental | Predicted | |||
| Glucose concentration | 23.38 g/L | Biomass yield | 7.91 ± 0.23 | 7.85 g/L |
| Inoculation intensity | 31.2 × 109 cfu cells/mL | Carotenoid yield | 5.63 ± 0.22 | 5.48 mg/L |
| Aeration intensity | 7.85 L/L min | CTX yield | 5.07 ± 0.07 | 4.99 mg/L |
Mean ± standard deviation (n = 5).