Angel V Peterchev1, Kevin DʼOstilio, John C Rothwell, David L Murphy. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This work aims at flexible and practical pulse parameter control in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which is currently very limited in commercial devices. APPROACH: We present a third generation controllable pulse parameter device (cTMS3) that uses a novel circuit topology with two energy-storage capacitors. It incorporates several implementation and functionality advantages over conventional TMS devices and other devices with advanced pulse shape control. cTMS3 generates lower internal voltage differences and is implemented with transistors with a lower voltage rating than prior cTMS devices. MAIN RESULTS: cTMS3 provides more flexible pulse shaping since the circuit topology allows four coil-voltage levels during a pulse, including approximately zero voltage. The near-zero coil voltage enables snubbing of the ringing at the end of the pulse without the need for a separate active snubber circuit. cTMS3 can generate powerful rapid pulse sequences (< 10 ms inter pulse interval) by increasing the width of each subsequent pulse and utilizing the large capacitor energy storage, allowing the implementation of paradigms such as paired-pulse and quadripulse TMS with a single pulse generation circuit. cTMS3 can also generate theta (50 Hz) burst stimulation with predominantly unidirectional electric field pulses. The cTMS3 device functionality and output strength are illustrated with electrical output measurements as well as a study of the effect of pulse width and polarity on the active motor threshold in ten healthy volunteers. SIGNIFICANCE: The cTMS3 features could extend the utility of TMS as a research, diagnostic, and therapeutic tool.
OBJECTIVE: This work aims at flexible and practical pulse parameter control in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which is currently very limited in commercial devices. APPROACH: We present a third generation controllable pulse parameter device (cTMS3) that uses a novel circuit topology with two energy-storage capacitors. It incorporates several implementation and functionality advantages over conventional TMS devices and other devices with advanced pulse shape control. cTMS3 generates lower internal voltage differences and is implemented with transistors with a lower voltage rating than prior cTMS devices. MAIN RESULTS: cTMS3 provides more flexible pulse shaping since the circuit topology allows four coil-voltage levels during a pulse, including approximately zero voltage. The near-zero coil voltage enables snubbing of the ringing at the end of the pulse without the need for a separate active snubber circuit. cTMS3 can generate powerful rapid pulse sequences (< 10 ms inter pulse interval) by increasing the width of each subsequent pulse and utilizing the large capacitor energy storage, allowing the implementation of paradigms such as paired-pulse and quadripulse TMS with a single pulse generation circuit. cTMS3 can also generate theta (50 Hz) burst stimulation with predominantly unidirectional electric field pulses. The cTMS3 device functionality and output strength are illustrated with electrical output measurements as well as a study of the effect of pulse width and polarity on the active motor threshold in ten healthy volunteers. SIGNIFICANCE: The cTMS3 features could extend the utility of TMS as a research, diagnostic, and therapeutic tool.
Authors: A Oliviero; P Profice; P A Tonali; F Pilato; E Saturno; M Dileone; F Ranieri; V Di Lazzaro Journal: Neurosci Res Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 3.304
Authors: Angel V Peterchev; Stefan M Goetz; Gregory G Westin; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; David L K Murphy; I Cassie Kozyrkov; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Sergey N Makarov; Janakinadh Yanamadala; Matthew W Piazza; Alex M Helderman; Niang S Thang; Edward H Burnham; Alvaro Pascual-Leone Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Zhiyong Zeng; Lari M Koponen; Rena Hamdan; Zhongxi Li; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Kevin D'Ostilio; Stefan M Goetz; Ricci Hannah; Matteo Ciocca; Raffaella Chieffo; Jui-Cheng A Chen; Angel V Peterchev; John C Rothwell Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Simone Rossi; Andrea Antal; Sven Bestmann; Marom Bikson; Carmen Brewer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Linda L Carpenter; Massimo Cincotta; Robert Chen; Jeff D Daskalakis; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael D Fox; Mark S George; Donald Gilbert; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Giacomo Koch; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Jean Pascal Lefaucheur; Letizia Leocani; Sarah H Lisanby; Carlo Miniussi; Frank Padberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Walter Paulus; Angel V Peterchev; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Rotenberg; John Rothwell; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Mouhsin M Shafi; Hartwig R Siebner; Yoshikatzu Ugawa; Eric M Wassermann; Abraham Zangen; Ulf Ziemann; Mark Hallett Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2020-10-24 Impact factor: 4.861