Literature DB >> 28029593

Pulse Width Affects Scalp Sensation of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Angel V Peterchev1, Bruce Luber2, Gregory G Westin3, Sarah H Lisanby4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scalp sensation and pain comprise the most common side effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which can reduce tolerability and complicate experimental blinding.
OBJECTIVE: We explored whether changing the width of single TMS pulses affects the quality and tolerability of the resultant somatic sensation.
METHODS: Using a controllable pulse parameter TMS device with a figure-8 coil, single monophasic magnetic pulses inducing electric field with initial phase width of 30, 60, and 120 µs were delivered in 23 healthy volunteers. Resting motor threshold of the right first dorsal interosseus was determined for each pulse width, as reported previously. Subsequently, pulses were delivered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at each of the three pulse widths at two amplitudes (100% and 120% of the pulse-width-specific motor threshold), with 20 repetitions per condition delivered in random order. After each pulse, subjects rated 0-to-10 visual analog scales for Discomfort, Sharpness, and Strength of the sensation.
RESULTS: Briefer TMS pulses with amplitude normalized to the motor threshold were perceived as slightly more uncomfortable than longer pulses (with an average 0.89 point increase on the Discomfort scale for pulse width of 30 µs compared to 120 µs). The sensation of the briefer pulses was felt to be substantially sharper (2.95 points increase for 30 µs compared to 120 µs pulse width), but not stronger than longer pulses. As expected, higher amplitude pulses increased the perceived discomfort and strength, and, to a lesser degree the perceived sharpness.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings contradict a previously published hypothesis that briefer TMS pulses are more tolerable. We discovered that the opposite is true, which merits further study as a means of enhancing tolerability in the context of repetitive TMS.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pulse width; Scalp; Sensation; Tolerability; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; cTMS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28029593      PMCID: PMC5241181          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  27 in total

1.  Relevance of stimulus duration for activation of motor and sensory fibers: implications for the study of H-reflexes and magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  M Panizza; J Nilsson; B J Roth; P J Basser; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-02

2.  Impact of pulse duration in single pulse TMS.

Authors:  H Rothkegel; M Sommer; W Paulus; N Lang
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation--a sandwich coil design for a better sham.

Authors:  Jens Sommer; Andreas Jansen; Bianca Dräger; Olaf Steinsträter; Caterina Breitenstein; Michael Deppe; Stefan Knecht
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  A pilot functional MRI study of the effects of prefrontal rTMS on pain perception.

Authors:  Laura Martin; Jeffrey J Borckardt; Scott T Reeves; Heather Frohman; Will Beam; Ziad Nahas; Kevin Johnson; Jarred Younger; Alok Madan; David Patterson; Mark George
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Enhancement of Neuromodulation with Novel Pulse Shapes Generated by Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; David L K Murphy; I Cassie Kozyrkov; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  The use of topical lidocaine to reduce pain during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression.

Authors:  Kenneth Trevino; Shawn M McClintock; Mustafa M Husain
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.635

7.  Reducing pain and unpleasantness during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Borckardt; Arthur R Smith; Kelby Hutcheson; Kevin Johnson; Ziad Nahas; Berry Anderson; M Bret Schneider; Scott T Reeves; Mark S George
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.635

8.  A real electro-magnetic placebo (REMP) device for sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Marisa Ferro; Massimo Cincotta; Monica Ulivelli; Sabina Bartalini; Carlo Miniussi; Fabio Giovannelli; Stefano Passero
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  The painfulness of active, but not sham, transcranial magnetic stimulation decreases rapidly over time: results from the double-blind phase of the OPT-TMS Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Borckardt; Ziad H Nahas; John Teal; Sarah H Lisanby; William M McDonald; David Avery; Valerie Durkalski; Martina Pavlicova; James M Long; Harold A Sackeim; Mark S George
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 8.955

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Problem and Potential of TMS' Infinite Parameter Space: A Targeted Review and Road Map Forward.

Authors:  Kevin A Caulfield; Joshua C Brown
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  Modular multilevel TMS device with wide output range and ultrabrief pulse capability for sound reduction.

Authors:  Zhiyong Zeng; Lari M Koponen; Rena Hamdan; Zhongxi Li; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 3.  Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Andrea Antal; Sven Bestmann; Marom Bikson; Carmen Brewer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Linda L Carpenter; Massimo Cincotta; Robert Chen; Jeff D Daskalakis; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael D Fox; Mark S George; Donald Gilbert; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Giacomo Koch; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Jean Pascal Lefaucheur; Letizia Leocani; Sarah H Lisanby; Carlo Miniussi; Frank Padberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Walter Paulus; Angel V Peterchev; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Rotenberg; John Rothwell; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Mouhsin M Shafi; Hartwig R Siebner; Yoshikatzu Ugawa; Eric M Wassermann; Abraham Zangen; Ulf Ziemann; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.861

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.