Literature DB >> 10656513

Influence of pulse configuration and direction of coil current on excitatory effects of magnetic motor cortex and nerve stimulation.

L Niehaus1, B U Meyer, T Weyh.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This paper describes the influence of pulse configuration and current direction on the excitation of the hand-associated motor cortex and the median nerve by magnetic stimulation. Monophasic and biphasic current pulses with the same peak rise time of 80 micros and a maximum rate of current change (dI/dt) were discharged through an eight-shaped coil of the stimulator used (Dantec MagPro). Two current directions with opposite orientation in the coil axis were studied.
FINDINGS: (1) for both, cortex and nerve stimulation, biphasic stimuli were more effective and elicited compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) with lower thresholds and larger amplitudes. (2) Using biphasic pulses the direction of the currents in the first phase of the pulse did not influence the CMAP amplitude. (3) Using monophasic pulses induced currents oriented postero-anteriorly in the motor cortex or orthodromically along the nerve axis elicited larger CMAPs than currents in the opposite orientation. (4) Pulse configuration did not influence the CMAP-latencies and by this the stimulation site (cortex, nerve).
CONCLUSION: Monophasic stimuli are useful to investigate excitation effects which are dependent on the current direction. The application of biphasic stimuli with their stronger excitation effects might be advantageous when patients with high cortical thresholds or deep lying nerves shall be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10656513     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00198-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  18 in total

1.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Yongqiang Zhao; Ulf Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Orientation-specific fast rTMS maximizes corticospinal inhibition and facilitation.

Authors:  Tobias Tings; Nicolas Lang; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus; Martin Sommer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The amplitude of lower leg motor evoked potentials is a reliable measure when controlled for torque and motor task.

Authors:  Hubertus J A van Hedel; Christian Murer; Volker Dietz; Armin Curt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Evoked potentials in large-scale cortical networks elicited by TMS of the visual cortex.

Authors:  Javier O Garcia; Emily D Grossman; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Pulse width dependence of motor threshold and input-output curve characterized with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Stefan M Goetz; Gregory G Westin; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

Review 7.  Rehabilitating the addicted brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Marco Diana; Tommi Raij; Miriam Melis; Aapo Nummenmaa; Lorenzo Leggio; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulator with enhanced circuit topology and pulse shaping.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Kevin DʼOstilio; John C Rothwell; David L Murphy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  The Effects of Waveform and Current Direction on the Efficacy and Test-Retest Reliability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Paula Davila-Pérez; Ali Jannati; Peter J Fried; Javier Cudeiro Mazaira; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.