| Literature DB >> 25239700 |
Victor Kuete1, Patrick Y Ango, Samuel O Yeboah, Armelle T Mbaveng, Renameditswe Mapitse, Gilbert D W F Kapche, Bonaventure T Ngadjui, Thomas Efferth.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The search for natural products as potential cytotoxic agents has yielded promising candidates. However multidrug resistance (MDR) is still a major hurdle for patients receiving chemotherapy. In the present study, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of the methanol extracts of four dietary Aframomum plant species (A. arundinaceum, A. alboviolaceum, A. kayserianum and A. polyanthum) against nine sensitive and MDR cancer cell lines. We have also identified the bioactive constituents of A. arundinaceum.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25239700 PMCID: PMC4177760 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Figure 1Chemical structures of compounds isolated from the fruit of K Schum. 1: aframodial; 2: 8(17),12-labdadien-15,16-dial; 3: galanolactone; 4: galanal A; 5: galanal B; 6: 1-p-menthene-3,6-diol; 7: 1,4-dihydroxybenzene; 8: naringenin; 9: kaempferol-3,7,4’-trimethylether.
Figure 2Growth percentage (%) of leukemia CCRF-CEM cancer cell line treated with plant extracts and isolated compounds at 40 μg/mL and doxorubicin (20 μg/mL). 1: aframodial; 2: 8(17),12-labdadien-15,16-dial; 3: galanolactone; 4: galanal A; 5: galanal B; 6: 1-p-menthene-3,6-diol; 7: 1,4-dihydroxybenzene; 8: naringenin; 9: kaempferol-3,7,4’-trimethylether.
Cytotoxicity of the studied extracts, compounds and doxorubicin towards sensitive and drug-resistant cancer cell lines and normal cells as determined by the resazurin assay
| Cell lines | Studied samples, IC 50values (μg/mL) aand degree of resistance (in braket) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Compounds from | Doxorubucin | |||||
|
|
| 4 | 5 | 8 | 9 | ||
| CCRF-CEM | 20.37 ± 3.10 | 18.08 ± 0.98 | 17.32 ± 1.96 | 19.81 ± 2.01 | 12.20 ± 1.87 | 18.38 ± 2.04 | 0.11 ± 0.01 |
| CEM/ADR5000 | 28.16 ± 1.24 (1.38) | 13.73 ± 1.02 (0.76) | - (>2.31) | - (>2.02) | 7.86 ± 0.74 (0.64) | 18.22 ± 1.18 (0.99) | 195.12 ± 14.30 (1772) |
| MDA-MB-231 | 33.79 ± 2.38 | 29.98 ± 1.86 | - | - | 9.51 ± 1.03 | - | 1.10 ± 0.01 |
| MDA-MB-231- | 30.24 ± 2.18 (0.89) | 30.66 ± 3.17 (1.02) | 27.99 ± 2.39 (<0.70) | - | 18.12 ± 2.01 (1.91) | 33.14 ± 2.64 (<0.83) | 7.83 ± 0.01 (7.11) |
| HCT116 | - | 23.06 ± 2.21 | - | - | 13.65 ± 1.11 | - | 1.43 ± 0.02 |
| HCT116 | - | 27.38 ± 1.92 (1.19) | - | - | 13.86 ± 0.94 (1.02) | 36.74 ± 2.31 (<0.82) | 4.06 ± 0.04 (2.84) |
| U87MG | - | 36.70 ± 2.12 | - | - | 29.81 ± 1.88 | - | 1.06 ± 0.03 |
| U87MG. | 20.59 ± 1.87 (<0.51) | 24.42 ± 1.95 (0.67) | - | - | 18.02 ± 1.34 (0.60) | - | 6.11 ± 0.04 (5.76) |
| HepG2 | - | 23.15 ± 1.97 (<0.58) | - | - | 23.46 ± 1.95 (<0.59) | - | 1.41 ± 0.12 (<0.04) |
| AML12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
aThe degree of resistance was determined as the ratio of IC50 value in the resistant divided by the IC50 in the sensitive cell line; AML12 was used as the corresponding resistant counterpart for HepG2. 4: galanal A; 5: galanal B; 8: naringenin; 9: kaempferol-3,7,4’-trimethylether; (-): >40 μg/mL.