| Literature DB >> 23961425 |
Jackson A Seukep1, Aimé G Fankam, Doriane E Djeussi, Igor K Voukeng, Simplice B Tankeo, Jaurès Ak Noumdem, Antoine Hln Kuete, Victor Kuete.
Abstract
The morbidity and mortality caused by bacterial infections significantly increased with resistance to commonly used antibiotics. This is partially due to the activation of efflux pumps in Gram-negative bacteria. The present work designed to assess the in vitro antibacterial activities of seven Cameroonian dietary plants (Sesamum indicum, Sesamum radiatum, Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Corchous olitorius, Cyperus esculentus, Adansonia digitata, Aframomum kayserianum), against multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria over expressing active efflux pumps. The standard phytochemical methods were used to detect the main classes of secondary metabolites in the extracts. The antibacterial activities of the studied extracts in the absence or presence of an efflux pump inhibitor (PAβN) were evaluated using liquid microbroth dilution method. The results obtained indicated that apart from the extract of C. esculentus, all other samples contained alkaloids, phenols and polyphenols meanwhile other classes of chemicals were selectively present. The studied extracts displayed antibacterial activities with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) values ranged from 64 to 1024 μg/mL on the majority of the 27 tested microbial strains. The extract of S. indicum was active against 77.77% of the tested microorganisms whilst the lowest MIC value (64 μg/mL) was recorded with that of A. kayserianum against E. aerogenes EA294. The results of the present work provide baseline information on the possible used of the tested Cameroonian dietary plants in the treatment of bacterial infections including multi-drug resistant phenotypes.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial activity; Cameroon; Dietary plants; Efflux pumps; Gram-negative bacteria; Multi-drug resistant
Year: 2013 PMID: 23961425 PMCID: PMC3738912 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Plants used in the present study and evidence of their activities
| Plants samples, part used | Traditional used | Known antimicrobial activities of plants |
|---|---|---|
| Bombaceae | Febrifuge, antidysentery, antioxydant, analgesic, antidiarrheal (Kaboré et al. | Aqueous, ethanol and petroleum ether extracts |
| Cyperaceae | (/)b | (/) |
| Pedaliaceae | Liniment, laxative, emollient (Kokate et al. | (/) |
| Lauraceae | Digestive disorders, anti dysentery, laxative. | Isolated compounds (Cinnamaldehyde and Eugenol) from essential oil showed an activity: against Pl (Gende et al. |
| Tiliaceae | Gonorrhoea, cystitis chronic, analgesic, febrifuge, antitumor, anti-inflammatory (Zacharia et al. | Methanol, chloroform and petroleum ether extracts. |
| Pedaliaceae | Antirhume, anticatarrate, against ocular pains and cutaneous eruptions (Bankole et al. | Methanol and ethanol extracts |
| Zingiberaceae | Anti-mumps, dysmenorrhoeas, vermifuge (Tane et al. | Isolated compound Aframodial from this plant showed an activity: |
(HNC), Cameroon National Herbarium; (SRF), Société des reserves forestière du Cameroun; (/). Not reported. Screened Activity: Significant (S:MIC < 100 μg/mL), moderate (M: 100 < MIC ≤ 625 μg/mL), Weak (F:MIC > 625 μg/mL) (Kuete 2010), Q, qualitative activity based on the determination of the inhibition zone. Ca Candida albicans, St Salmonella typhi, An Aspergilus nicfer, Bs Bacillus subtilis, EC Escherichia coli, Kp Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pa Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pvt Proteus vulgaris, Sau Staphylococcus aureus, Cu Candida utilis, Sc Saccharomyces cereviciae, Sm Streptococcus mutans, Sa Streptococcus aeoginosa, La Lactobacillus acidophillus, ML Micrococcus luteus, San Streptococcus anginosus, Ea Enterobacter aerogenes, Rs Rhizoctonia solanic, Bp Bacillus punilus, Sb Shigella boydii, Ss Shigella sonnei, Sd Shigella dysenteria, Vc Vibrio cholerae, Csp Citrobacter sp, Pm Proteus mirabilis, Sal Staphylococcus albus, Sma Serratia marcescens, Sp Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Ha Hansenula anomala, Scl Sclerotinia libertiana, PC Penicillim crustasum, Mm Mucor mucedo, Rc Rhizopus chinensis, Ecl Enterobacter cloacae, PS Providencia stuartii, Pl Paenibacillus larvae,Vhs herpes simplex virus,Vp Virus of poliomyelitis, VI Influenza. Virus.
Bacterial strains and features
| Bacteria | Features | References |
|---|---|---|
| Reference strain of | ||
| Reference strain of | ||
| Wild-type E. coli K-12 | (Bagliomi et al. | |
| (Martina | ||
| AG100 ΔacrAB::KANR | (Monks et al. | |
| ΔacrAB mutant AG100, owing acrF gene markedly overexpressed; TETR | Monks et al. ( | |
| ΔacrAB mutant AG100 | Chevalier et al. ( | |
| Wild-type E. coli K-12 | Lorenzi et al. ( | |
| Reference strain | ||
| EA 289 ΔacrAB: KANR | (Pradel and Pagès | |
| CHLR resistant variant obtained from ATCC13048 over-expressing the AcrAB pump | Ghisalberti et al. ( | |
| EA 289 tolC::KANR | (Pradel and Pagès | |
| Clinical MDR isolate exhibiting energy-dependent norfloxacin and chloramphenicol efflux with KANR and AMPR and NALR and STRR and TETR | (Mallèa et al. | |
| KAN sensitive derivative of EA27 | Ghisalberti et al. ( | |
| Reference strain | ||
| Clinical MDR isolate, TETR ,AMPR ,ATMR , and CEFR | Chevalier et al. ( | |
| Clinical MDR isolate, TETR,CHLR,AMPR, and ATMR | Fredrickson et al. ( | |
| Laboratory collection | ||
| Reference strain | ||
| MDR clinical isolate | Lorenzi et al. ( | |
| Reference strain | ||
| Clinical MDR isolate, AcrAB | Laboratory collection | |
| Clinical MDR isolate, AcrAB | ||
AMPR, ATMR, CEFR, CFTR, CHLR, FEPR, KANR, MOXR, NALR, NORR STRR, and TETR Resistance to ampicillin, aztreonam, cephalothin, cefadroxil, chloramphenicol, cefepime, kanamycin, moxalactam, streptomycin, and tetracycline; MDR multidrug resistant., OMPF and OMPC Outer Membran Protein F and C respectively. AcrAB-TolC efflux pump AcrAB associate to TolC porine, Pa Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Parts used, extraction yields, physical aspect and phytochemical composition of the plant extracts
| Extracts | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parts used | Stem and leaves | Bark | Stem and leaves | Beans | Fruits | Fruits | Fruits |
| Yield* (%) | 6.67 | 5.65 | 4.81 | 4.87 | 4.95 | 3.40 | 15.21 |
| Alkaloids | + | + | + | + | + | + | - |
| Anthocyanins | - | + | - | - | + | - | - |
| Anthraquinones | - | - | - | + | - | - | - |
| Flavonoids | + | - | - | - | - | + | - |
| Phenols | + | + | + | + | + | + | - |
| Tannins | + | - | + | - | + | - | - |
| Triterpenes | - | + | - | + | + | + | + |
| Sterols | + | - | + | + | - | + | + |
| Saponins | - | - | + | + | + | + | + |
(+): Present; (−): Absent; * yield calculated as the ratio of the mass of the obtained methanol extract/mass of the plant powder.
MIC, MBC and MBC/MIC ratios of plants extracts and CHL on the studied bacterial species
| Tested bacteria | Extracts and antimicrobial parameters (MIC and MBC in μg/mL) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHL | CHL + PβBN | ||||||||
| 1024 (−) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 (512) | 4 | |
| 512 (−) | - | 1024 (−) | 512 (−) | - | 512 (−) | 512 (512) | 4 (128) | 1 | |
| - | 1024 (−) | - | 1024 (−) | 512 (−) | - | - | 4 (32) | 1 | |
| - | 512 (512-) | 1024 (−) | - | 1024 (−) | - | - | 128 (512) | 8 | |
| - | 512 (−) | 128 (512) | 512 (512) | 1024 (−) | - | 256 (−) | 4 (64) | 0.5 | |
| 1024 (−) | 512 (−) | 1024 (−) | 512 (−) | 512 (−) | - | 1024 (−) | 64 (8) | 8 | |
| 1024 (−) | 512 (−) | 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | - | - | 32 (512) | 8 | |
| - | 1024 (−) | 512 (−) | 512 (−) | - | - | - | 4(128) | <4 | |
| - | - | 512 (−) | 1024 (−) | - | - | - | 8 (32) | 4 | |
| - | - | - | - | - | 32 (512) | 8 | |||
| 1024 (−) | 1024(−) | - (−) | 1024 (−) | - | - | - | 128 (−) | 64 | |
| 1024 (−) | 512 (−) | 1024 (−) | 1024 (1024) | 1024 (−) | 256 (−) | 512 (−) | 256 (−) | 64 | |
| - | - | 1024 (−) | 512 (−) | - | - | - | 32 | ||
| 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | - | 1024 (−) | - | - | - | 256 (−) | 64 | |
| 512 (−) | - | 512 (−) | - | - | - | 8 (256) | 4 | ||
| 512 (−) | 512 (−) | 1024 (−) | 512 (512) | 1024 (1024) | - | - | 4 (128) | 1 | |
| 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | - | - | 128 (−) | 32 | |
| 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | 512 (−) | - | 1024 (−) | - | 4 (128) | 1 | ||
| - | 512 (−) | 1024 (−) | 512 (−) | - | - | 32 (512) | 32 | ||
| 1024 (−) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 32 (256) | 8 | |
| 1024 (−) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 64 (512) | 16 | |
| - | - | 512 (−) | - | - | 4 (32) | 2 | |||
| 1024 (−) | - | 512 (−) | 512 (1024) | 1024 (−) | - | - | 4 (64) | 2 | |
| - | 512 (−) | 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | - | 256 (−) | 1024 (−) | 16 (64) | 4 | |
| 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | - | - | - | 256 (−) | 16 | |
| 1024 (−) | - | 512 (−) | 1024 (−) | - | - | - | 256 (−) | 16 | |
| 512 512 | 512 (−) | - | 1024 (−) | 1024 (−) | - | - | 512 (−) | 16 | |
(−):> 1024 μg/mL for the extracts and > 512 μg/mL for chloramphenicol and non given MBC/MIC. NT: not tested. (): MBC in μg/m.