| Literature DB >> 25238588 |
Ekua W Brenu1, Kevin J Ashton2, Jana Batovska2, Donald R Staines3, Sonya M Marshall-Gradisnik1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are known to regulate many biological processes and their dysregulation has been associated with a variety of diseases including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). The recent discovery of stable and reproducible miRNA in plasma has raised the possibility that circulating miRNAs may serve as novel diagnostic markers. The objective of this study was to determine the role of plasma miRNA in CFS/ME.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25238588 PMCID: PMC4169517 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of CFS/ME and non-fatigued control participants.
| Parameters | Non-Fatigued (n = 20) | CFS/ME (n = 20) |
|
|
| 47.3±6.7 | 44.5±6.0 | 0.24 |
|
| 6.19±1.58 | 5.53±1.45 | 0.12 |
|
| 35.89±8.81 | 34.80±6.41 | 0.53 |
|
| 6.72±1.60 | 6.96±1.77 | 0.66 |
|
| 57.39±8.94 | 58.25±6.49 | 0.74 |
|
| 2.14±0.53 | 1.89±0.46 | 0.13 |
|
| 0.41±0.12 | 0.39±0.15 | 0.66 |
|
| 3.64±1.53 | 3.25±1.05 | 0.36 |
|
| 4.20±0.36 | 4.13±0.24 | 0.43 |
|
| 133.68±8.52 | 132.20±7.88 | 0.40 |
|
| 37.14±1.95 | 36.67±2.10 | 0.40 |
|
| 88.82±5.39 | 88.69±2.58 | 0.51 |
|
| 31.97±2.01 | 32.02±1.13 | 0.78 |
|
| 359.95±7.17 | 360.95±6.44 | 0.64 |
|
| 12.52±1.28 | 12.44±0.69 | 0.41 |
|
| 231.06±88.61 | 243.80±53.20 | 0.38 |
|
| 7.59±0.77 | 7.63±1.16 | 0.72 |
*Denotes statistical significance set at P<0.05.
The blood characteristics of the participants in the study are presented below following full blood count analysis.
Characteristics of miRNA-Seq subset of CFS/ME and non-fatigued control participants.
| Parameters | Non-Fatigued (n = 6) | CFS/ME (n = 6) |
|
|
| 48.8±8.0 | 41.7±4.8 | 0.09 |
|
| 6.23±0.83 | 5.67±1.60 | 0.70 |
|
| 41.30±5.50 | 33.27±6.46 | 0.09 |
|
| 7.02±1.20 | 6.42±1.22 | 0.49 |
|
| 51.68±5.28 | 60.32±6.02 |
|
|
| 2.58±0.53 | 1.83±0.48 |
|
|
| 0.43±0.08 | 0.37±0.16 | 0.49 |
|
| 3.22±0.49 | 3.45±1.09 | 0.39 |
|
| 4.24±0.39 | 4.06±0.26 | 0.24 |
|
| 134.67±9.69 | 132.33±8.76 | 0.49 |
|
| 37.35±2.09 | 36.47±2.32 | 0.49 |
|
| 88.25±3.95 | 88.87±2.15 | 0.94 |
|
| 31.78±0.95 | 32.30±0.80 | 0.24 |
|
| 360.33±8.41 | 363.33±0.37 | 0.49 |
|
| 12.03±0.47 | 12.62±0.37 |
|
|
| 248.17±85.41 | 237.17±41.39 | 0.70 |
|
| 7.58±0.80 | 6.90±0.86 | 0.24 |
* Denotes statistical significance set at P<0.05.
The blood characteristics of the participants chosen for sequencing analysis.
Figure 1Read classification as predicted by miRanalyzer.
Percentage of A) read count and B) unique reads mapped to mature miRNAs, other microRNAs (ambiguous, star and hairpin), other non-coding RNAs and unmapped.
Top 25 most abundant miRNAs identified.
| miRNA ID | Rank (Non-Fatigued) | Base Mean | Rank (CFS/ME) | Base Mean |
|
| 1 | 232,025 | 1 | 206,637 |
|
| 2 | 163,282 | 2 | 161,507 |
|
| 3 | 122,247 | 3 | 112,091 |
|
| 4 | 98,273 | 4 | 102,010 |
|
| 5 | 64,038 | 5 | 58,586 |
|
| 6 | 56,084 | 6 | 54,753 |
|
| 7 | 49,098 | 7 | 37,346 |
|
| 8 | 35,388 | 8 | 33,991 |
|
| 9 | 34,660 | 9 | 33,841 |
|
| 10 | 32,226 | 10 | 27,914 |
|
| 11 | 20,792 | 12 | 16,977 |
|
| 12 | 17,096 | 11 | 17,960 |
|
| 13 | 12,834 | 16 | 10,555 |
|
| 14 | 12,733 | 14 | 13,057 |
|
| 15 | 12,559 | 13 | 13,146 |
|
| 16 | 11,374 | 17 | 10,153 |
|
| 17 | 9,241 | 18 | 8,655 |
|
| 18 | 8,750 | 15 | 12,961 |
|
| 19 | 8,093 | 22 | 6,443 |
|
| 20 | 7,619 | 19 | 7,856 |
|
| 21 | 6,451 | 23 | 6,292 |
|
| 22 | 6,252 | 25 | 5,895 |
|
| 23 | 6,093 | 20 | 7,497 |
|
| 24 | 5,994 | 21 | 7,246 |
|
| 25 | 5,749 | 29 | 4,863 |
The base mean is the mean of the counts for each miRNA divided by the size factor for each condition (as calculated by DESeq).
miRNAs differentially expressed between CFS/ME and non-fatigued controls.
| miRNA ID | Base Mean | Base Mean | Fold Change |
|
|
| ||||
|
| 8,751.91 | 12,978.10 | 1.48 | 0.0476 |
|
| 2,060.61 | 4,439.17 | 2.15 | 0.0005 |
|
| 994.22 | 1,811.23 | 1.82 | 0.0443 |
|
| ||||
|
| 366.94 | 590.85 | 1.61 | 0.0277 |
|
| 347.35 | 550.72 | 1.59 | 0.0336 |
|
| 125.63 | 224.69 | 1.79 | 0.0213 |
|
| 59.84 | 130.44 | 2.18 | 0.0051 |
|
| 39.87 | 82.49 | 2.07 | 0.0263 |
|
| 10.47 | 78.06 | 7.45 | 0.0002 |
|
| 1.72 | 1.23 | 0.71 | 0.0208 |
|
| 1.56 | 1.16 | 0.75 | 0.0106 |
|
| 1.39 | 0.91 | 0.65 | 0.0449 |
|
| 1.31 | 1.10 | 0.84 | 0.0217 |
|
| 1.07 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.0240 |
|
| 1.07 | 1.10 | 1.03 | 0.0446 |
|
| 0.90 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.0126 |
|
| 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.87 | 0.0128 |
|
| 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.95 | 0.0251 |
|
| 0.82 | 0.91 | 1.11 | 0.0484 |
The base mean is the mean of the counts for each miRNA divided by the size factor for each condition (as calculated by DESeq). *The complementary analog for miR-126.
Figure 2Expression stability values (M) of the putative reference genes tested in plasma.
The expression of four genes was analysed to determine the most suitable reference gene. MicroRNAs are ranked from the most stable to the least stable (left to right). The dotted line indicates the recommended threshold value of <1.0 for heterogeneous samples.
Figure 3Relative expression data presented as boxplots for miRNAs identified as differentially expressed by Illumina HTS.
Boxes indicate the interquartile range (25%–75%) with the horizontal bar within each box indicating the media. The whiskers show the minimum and maximum values. *P<0.05 vs. non-fatigued control (n = 20/group).