Literature DB >> 25237060

Epigenetic events determine tissue-specific toxicity of inhalational exposure to the genotoxic chemical 1,3-butadiene in male C57BL/6J mice.

Grace Chappell1, Tetyana Kobets2, Bridget O'Brien1, Natalia Tretyakova1, Dewakar Sangaraju1, Oksana Kosyk1, Kenneth G Sexton1, Wanda Bodnar1, Igor P Pogribny1, Ivan Rusyn3.   

Abstract

1,3-Butadiene (BD), a widely used industrial chemical and a ubiquitous environmental pollutant, is a known human carcinogen. Although genotoxicity is an established mechanism of the tumorigenicity of BD, epigenetic effects have also been observed in livers of mice exposed to the chemical. To better characterize the diverse molecular mechanisms of BD tumorigenicity, we evaluated genotoxic and epigenotoxic effects of BD exposure in mouse tissues that are target (lung and liver) and non-target (kidney) for BD-induced tumors. We hypothesized that epigenetic alterations may explain, at least in part, the tissue-specific differences in BD tumorigenicity in mice. We evaluated the level of N-7-(2,3,4-trihydroxybut-1-yl)guanine adducts and 1,4-bis-(guan-7-yl)-2,3-butanediol crosslinks, DNA methylation, and histone modifications in male C57BL/6 mice exposed to filtered air or 425 ppm of BD by inhalation (6 h/day, 5 days/week) for 2 weeks. Although DNA damage was observed in all three tissues of BD-exposed mice, variation in epigenetic effects clearly existed between the kidneys, liver, and lungs. Epigenetic alterations indicative of genomic instability, including demethylation of repetitive DNA sequences and alterations in histone-lysine acetylation, were evident in the liver and lung tissues of BD-exposed mice. Changes in DNA methylation were insignificant in the kidneys of treated mice, whereas marks of condensed heterochromatin and transcriptional silencing (histone-lysine trimethylation) were increased. These modifications may represent a potential mechanistic explanation for the lack of tumorigenesis in the kidney. Our results indicate that differential tissue susceptibility to chemical-induced tumorigenesis may be attributed to tissue-specific epigenetic alterations. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology 2014. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1,3-butadiene; epigenetics; genotoxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25237060      PMCID: PMC4250847          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  43 in total

Review 1.  The history of cancer epigenetics.

Authors:  Andrew P Feinberg; Benjamin Tycko
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  A role for cell-cycle-regulated histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Hiroshi Masumoto; David Hawke; Ryuji Kobayashi; Alain Verreault
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Analysis of low molecular weight hydrocarbons including 1,3-butadiene in engine exhaust gases using an aluminum oxide porous-layer open-tubular fused-silica column.

Authors:  N Pelz; N M Dempster; P R Shore
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.618

Review 4.  Mapping the epigenome--impact for toxicology.

Authors:  Jennifer Marlowe; Soon-Siong Teo; Salah-Dine Chibout; François Pognan; Jonathan Moggs
Journal:  EXS       Date:  2009

5.  A follow-up study of synthetic rubber workers.

Authors:  E Delzell; N Sathiakumar; M Hovinga; M Macaluso; J Julian; R Larson; P Cole; D C Muir
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1996-10-28       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 6.  Interactions between DNA damage, repair, and transcription.

Authors:  Andriy Khobta; Bernd Epe
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  The role of epigenetic events in genotoxic hepatocarcinogenesis induced by 2-acetylaminofluorene.

Authors:  Igor P Pogribny; Levan Muskhelishvili; Volodymyr P Tryndyak; Frederick A Beland
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  Toxicogenetics: population-based testing of drug and chemical safety in mouse models.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Daniel M Gatti; Timothy Wiltshire; Timothy Wilshire; Steven R Kleeberger; David W Threadgill
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 9.  Environmental toxicants, epigenetics, and cancer.

Authors:  Igor P Pogribny; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  H4K16 acetylation marks active genes and enhancers of embryonic stem cells, but does not alter chromatin compaction.

Authors:  Gillian C A Taylor; Ragnhild Eskeland; Betül Hekimoglu-Balkan; Madapura M Pradeepa; Wendy A Bickmore
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Environmental pollution and DNA methylation: carcinogenesis, clinical significance, and practical applications.

Authors:  Yi Cao
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Tissue- and strain-specific effects of a genotoxic carcinogen 1,3-butadiene on chromatin and transcription.

Authors:  Jennifer W Israel; Grace A Chappell; Jeremy M Simon; Sebastian Pott; Alexias Safi; Lauren Lewis; Paul Cotney; Hala S Boulos; Wanda Bodnar; Jason D Lieb; Gregory E Crawford; Terrence S Furey; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Application of epigenetic data in human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Ila L Cote; Shaun D McCullough; Ronald N Hines; John J Vandenberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-06

Review 4.  Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Grace Chappell; Igor P Pogribny; Kathryn Z Guyton; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.657

5.  Characterization of population variability of 1,3-butadiene derived protein adducts in humans and mice.

Authors:  Gunnar Boysen; Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu; Fred A Wright
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  Response of transposable elements to environmental stressors.

Authors:  Isabelle R Miousse; Marie-Cecile G Chalbot; Annie Lumen; Alesia Ferguson; Ilias G Kavouras; Igor Koturbash
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 5.657

7.  From the Cover: Sperm Molecular Biomarkers Are Sensitive Indicators of Testicular Injury following Subchronic Model Toxicant Exposure.

Authors:  Edward Dere; Shelby K Wilson; Linnea M Anderson; Kim Boekelheide
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Enhanced Antifungal Activity by Ab-Modified Amphotericin B-Loaded Nanoparticles Using a pH-Responsive Block Copolymer.

Authors:  Xiaolong Tang; Jingjing Dai; Jun Xie; Yongqiang Zhu; Ming Zhu; Zhi Wang; Chunmei Xie; Aixia Yao; Tingting Liu; Xiaoyu Wang; Li Chen; Qinglin Jiang; Shulei Wang; Yong Liang; Congjing Xu
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.703

9.  Variation in DNA-Damage Responses to an Inhalational Carcinogen (1,3-Butadiene) in Relation to Strain-Specific Differences in Chromatin Accessibility and Gene Transcription Profiles in C57BL/6J and CAST/EiJ Mice.

Authors:  Grace A Chappell; Jennifer W Israel; Jeremy M Simon; Sebastian Pott; Alexias Safi; Karl Eklund; Kenneth G Sexton; Wanda Bodnar; Jason D Lieb; Gregory E Crawford; Ivan Rusyn; Terrence S Furey
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  An Assessment on Ethanol-Blended Gasoline/Diesel Fuels on Cancer Risk and Mortality.

Authors:  Steffen Mueller; Gail Dennison; Shujun Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.