Literature DB >> 21907218

Interactions between DNA damage, repair, and transcription.

Andriy Khobta1, Bernd Epe.   

Abstract

This review addresses a variety of mechanisms by which DNA repair interacts with transcription and vice versa. Blocking of transcriptional elongation is the best studied of these mechanisms. Transcription recovery after damage therefore has often been used as a surrogate marker of DNA repair in cells. However, it has become evident that relationships between DNA damage, repair, and transcription are more complex due to various indirect effects of DNA damage on gene transcription. These include inhibition of transcription by DNA repair intermediates as well as regulation of transcription and of the epigenetic status of the genes by DNA repair-related mechanisms. In addition, since transcription is emerging as an important endogenous source of DNA damage in cells, we briefly summarise recent advances in understanding the nature of co-transcriptionally induced DNA damage and the DNA repair pathways involved.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21907218     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  18 in total

1.  APOBEC3 proteins and genomic stability: the high cost of a good defense.

Authors:  Iñigo Narvaiza; Sébastien Landry; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  X inactivation plays a major role in the gender bias in somatic expansion in a mouse model of the fragile X-related disorders: implications for the mechanism of repeat expansion.

Authors:  Rachel Adihe Lokanga; Xiao-Nan Zhao; Ali Entezam; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  The intertwined roles of transcription and repair proteins.

Authors:  Yick W Fong; Claudia Cattoglio; Robert Tjian
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Excision of uracil from transcribed DNA negatively affects gene expression.

Authors:  Bork Lühnsdorf; Bernd Epe; Andriy Khobta
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Genetic and epigenetic determinants of inter-individual variability in responses to toxicants.

Authors:  Lauren Lewis; Gregory E Crawford; Terrence S Furey; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-09-12

Review 6.  Mechanistic insights into transcription coupled DNA repair.

Authors:  Bibhusita Pani; Evgeny Nudler
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

7.  Epigenetic events determine tissue-specific toxicity of inhalational exposure to the genotoxic chemical 1,3-butadiene in male C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Grace Chappell; Tetyana Kobets; Bridget O'Brien; Natalia Tretyakova; Dewakar Sangaraju; Oksana Kosyk; Kenneth G Sexton; Wanda Bodnar; Igor P Pogribny; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  DNA mismatch repair preferentially safeguards actively transcribed genes.

Authors:  Yaping Huang; Guo-Min Li
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-08-23

Review 9.  Transcriptional roles of PARP1 in cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Schiewer; Karen E Knudsen
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 5.852

10.  Regulation of GC box activity by 8-oxoguanine.

Authors:  Nadine Müller; Andriy Khobta
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.