Literature DB >> 35469930

Characterization of population variability of 1,3-butadiene derived protein adducts in humans and mice.

Gunnar Boysen1, Ivan Rusyn2, Weihsueh A Chiu3, Fred A Wright4.   

Abstract

1,3-butadiene is a known human carcinogen and a chemical to which humans are exposed occupationally and through environmental pollution. Inhalation risk assessment of 1,3-butadiene was completed several decades ago before data on molecular biomarkers of exposure and effect have been reported from both human studies of workers and experimental studies in mice. To improve risk assessment of 1,3-butadiene, the quantitative characterization of uncertainty in estimations of inter-individual variability in cancer-related effects is needed. For this, we ought to take advantage of the availability of the data on 1,3-butadiene hemoglobin adducts, well established biomarkers of the internal dose of the reactive epoxides, from several large-scale human studies and from a study in a Collaborative Cross mouse population. We found that in humans, toxicokinetic uncertainty factor for 99th percentile of the population ranged from 3.27 to 7.9, depending on the hemoglobin adduct. For mice, these values ranged from less than 2 to 7.51, depending on the dose and the adduct. Quantitative estimated from this study can be used to reduce uncertainties in the parameter estimates used in the models to derive the inhalation unit risk, as well as to address possible differences in variability in 1,3-butadiene metabolism that may be dose-related.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35469930      PMCID: PMC9575152          DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.598


  46 in total

1.  Human variability for metabolic pathways with limited data (CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, ADH, esterases, glycine and sulphate conjugation).

Authors:  J L C M Dorne; K Walton; A G Renwick
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.023

2.  High throughput HPLC-ESI(-)-MS/MS methodology for mercapturic acid metabolites of 1,3-butadiene: Biomarkers of exposure and bioactivation.

Authors:  Srikanth Kotapati; Amanda Esades; Brock Matter; Chap Le; Natalia Tretyakova
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 5.192

3.  Molecular epidemiological studies in 1,3-butadiene exposed Czech workers: female-male comparisons.

Authors:  Richard J Albertini; Radim J Sram; Pamela M Vacek; Jeremiah Lynch; Pavel Rossner; Janice A Nicklas; Jake D McDonald; Gunnar Boysen; Nadia Georgieva; James A Swenberg
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 5.192

4.  Advancing chemical risk assessment decision-making with population variability data: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  1,3-butadiene: cancer, mutations, and adducts. Part V: Hemoglobin adducts as biomarkers of 1,3-butadiene exposure and metabolism.

Authors:  J A Swenberg; N I Christova-Gueorguieva; P B Upton; A Ranasinghe; N Scheller; K Y Wu; T Y Yen; R Hayes
Journal:  Res Rep Health Eff Inst       Date:  2000-03

6.  Population-Based Analysis of DNA Damage and Epigenetic Effects of 1,3-Butadiene in the Mouse.

Authors:  Lauren Lewis; Barbara Borowa-Mazgaj; Aline de Conti; Grace A Chappell; Yu-Syuan Luo; Wanda Bodnar; Kranti Konganti; Fred A Wright; David W Threadgill; Weihsueh A Chiu; Igor P Pogribny; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Lung metabolome of 1,3-butadiene exposed Collaborative Cross mice reflects metabolic phenotype of human lung cancer.

Authors:  Mary Nellis; Caitlin O Caperton; Ken Liu; ViLinh Tran; Young-Mi Go; Lance M Hallberg; Bill T Ameredes; Dean P Jones; Gunnar Boysen
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.571

Review 8.  Lessons Learned From Past Gene-Environment Interaction Successes.

Authors:  Beate R Ritz; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; W James Gauderman; Brandon L Pierce; Peter Kraft; Caroline M Tanner; Leah E Mechanic; Kimberly McAllister
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.363

9.  Population-based in vitro hazard and concentration-response assessment of chemicals: the 1000 genomes high-throughput screening study.

Authors:  Nour Abdo; Menghang Xia; Chad C Brown; Oksana Kosyk; Ruili Huang; Srilatha Sakamuru; Yi-Hui Zhou; John R Jack; Paul Gallins; Kai Xia; Yun Li; Weihsueh A Chiu; Alison A Motsinger-Reif; Christopher P Austin; Raymond R Tice; Ivan Rusyn; Fred A Wright
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Using Collaborative Cross Mouse Population to Fill Data Gaps in Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Population-Based Analysis of Toxicokinetics and Kidney Toxicodynamics of Tetrachloroethylene.

Authors:  Yu-Syuan Luo; Joseph A Cichocki; Nan-Hung Hsieh; Lauren Lewis; Fred A Wright; David W Threadgill; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.