Literature DB >> 25234995

On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.

Michael A Stone1, Brian C J Moore1.   

Abstract

Stone et al. [(2012). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 317-326] showed that a masker constructed to produce a near-constant envelope at the output of each auditory filter reduced speech intelligibility less than maskers of the same mean level with fluctuating envelopes, produced by 100% sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) at 8 Hz. Here, this effect was explored for a range of SAM rates from 1 to 81 Hz. Speech was filtered into 28 channels. A sinusoidal masker centered on each channel was added to the channel signal. The maskers were either unmodulated or had 100% SAM. In most conditions, even-numbered channels were presented to one ear and odd-numbered channels to the other. The signal-to-masker ratio was adapted to measure the Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) corresponding to 50% correct. The fluctuating masker benefit (FMB), the difference in SRT between the SAM and unmodulated masker, was negative for all SAM frequencies except 1 Hz. Due to the different slopes of the psychometric functions, when SRTs were inferred for more realistic performance levels, 74% or more, FMB was zero or negative for all SAM rates. It is concluded that a positive FMB, when it occurs, is a release from modulation and not energetic masking.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234995     DOI: 10.1121/1.4868392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Exploring Use of the Coordinate Response Measure in a Multitalker Babble Paradigm.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Recognition of synthesized vowel sequences in steady-state and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Dylan V Pearson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech Perception with Spectrally Non-overlapping Maskers as Measure of Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

6.  Speech recognition interference by the temporal and spectral properties of a single competing talker.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Switching Streams Across Ears to Evaluate Informational Masking of Speech-on-Speech.

Authors:  Axelle Calcus; Tim Schoof; Stuart Rosen; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The importance of processing resolution in "ideal time-frequency segregation" of masked speech and the implications for predicting speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Virginia Best; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Laura A D'Aquila
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William J Bologna; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.