Literature DB >> 15176620

Correlations among within-channel and between-channel auditory gap-detection thresholds in normal listeners.

Dennis P Phillips1, Jennifer C Smith.   

Abstract

We obtained data on within-channel and between-channel auditory temporal gap-detection acuity in the normal population. Ninety-five normal listeners were tested for gap-detection thresholds, for conditions in which the gap was bounded by spectrally identical, and by spectrally different, acoustic markers. Separate thresholds were obtained with the use of an adaptive tracking method, for gaps delimited by narrowband noise bursts centred on 1.0 kHz, noise bursts centred on 4.0 kHz, and for gaps bounded by a leading marker of 4.0 kHz noise and a trailing marker of 1.0 kHz noise. Gap thresholds were lowest for silent periods bounded by identical markers--'within-channel' stimuli. Gap thresholds were significantly longer for the between-channel stimulus--silent periods bounded by unidentical markers (p < 0.0001). Thresholds for the two within-channel tasks were highly correlated (R = 0.76). Thresholds for the between-channel stimulus were weakly correlated with thresholds for the within-channel stimuli (1.0 kHz, R = 0.39; and 4.0 kHz, R = 0.46). The relatively poor predictability of between-channel thresholds from the within-channel thresholds is new evidence on the separability of the mechanisms that mediate performance of the two tasks. The data confirm that the acuity difference for the tasks, which has previously been demonstrated in only small numbers of highly trained listeners, extends to a population of untrained listeners. The acuity of the between-channel mechanism may be relevant to the formation of voice-onset time-category boundaries in speech perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15176620     DOI: 10.1068/p5116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: within-channel and across-channel conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Nathan D Maxfield; Gabriel J Pitt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne; Timothy J Villabona
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Prosodic Boundary Effects on Syntactic Disambiguation in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Talita Fortunato-Tavares; Richard G Schwartz; Klara Marton; Claudia F de Andrade; Derek Houston
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Temporal Resolution of the Normal Ear in Listeners with Unilateral Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Ratul Dey; Jai Lal Davessar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-22

5.  Temporal resolution in individuals with neurological disorders.

Authors:  Camila Maia Rabelo; Jeffrey A Weihing; Eliane Schochat
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Auditory gap-in-noise detection behavior in ferrets and humans.

Authors:  Joshua R Gold; Fernando R Nodal; Fabian Peters; Andrew J King; Victoria M Bajo
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Temporal auditory processing and phonological awareness in children with benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes.

Authors:  M I R Amaral; R L Casali; M Boscariol; L L Lunardi; M M Guerreiro; M F Colella-Santos
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Auditory temporal resolution in adaptive tasks. Gap detection investigation.

Authors:  Abdulsalam A Alhaidary; Kishore Tanniru; Adel F Aljadaan; Lamya M Alabdulkarim
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  A Cortico-Collicular Amplification Mechanism for Gap Detection.

Authors:  Aldis P Weible; Iryna Yavorska; Michael Wehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Separating the Causes of Listening Difficulties in Children.

Authors:  Harvey Dillon; Sharon Cameron
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.