Literature DB >> 14614108

Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by progressions of frequency sensitivity.

Thomas M Talavage1, Martin I Sereno, Jennifer R Melcher, Patrick J Ledden, Bruce R Rosen, Anders M Dale.   

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging experiments have revealed an organization of frequency-dependent responses in human auditory cortex suggestive of multiple tonotopically organized areas. Numerous studies have sampled cortical responses to isolated narrow-band stimuli, revealing multiple locations in auditory cortex at which the position of response varies systematically with frequency content. Because appropriate anatomical or functional grouping of these distinct frequency-dependent responses is uncertain, the number and location of tonotopic mappings within human auditory cortex remains unclear. Further, sampling does not address whether the observed mappings exhibit continuity as a function of position. This functional magnetic resonance imaging study used frequency-swept stimuli to identify progressions of frequency sensitivity across the cortical surface. The center-frequency of narrow-band, amplitude-modulated noise was slowly swept between 125 and 8,000 Hz. The latency of response relative to sweep onset was determined for each cortical surface location. Because frequency varied systematically with time, response latency indicated the frequency to which a location was maximally sensitive. Areas of cortex exhibiting a progressive change in response latency with position were considered tonotopically organized. There exist two main findings. First, six progressions of frequency sensitivity (i.e., tonotopic mappings) were repeatably observed in the superior temporal plane. Second, the locations of the higher- and lower-frequency endpoints of these progressions were approximately congruent with regions reported to be most responsive to discrete higher- and lower-frequency stimuli. Based on these findings and previous anatomical work, we propose a correspondence between these progressions and anatomically defined cortical areas, suggesting that five areas in human auditory cortex exhibit at least six tonotopic organizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14614108     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01125.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  93 in total

1.  Nonlinearity of FMRI responses in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Whitney B Edmister
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Integration of auditory and vibrotactile stimuli: effects of frequency.

Authors:  E Courtenay Wilson; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Cortical representations of pitch in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Daniel Bendor; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Towards multimodal atlases of the human brain.

Authors:  Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson; Susumu Mori; Katrin Amunts; Karl Zilles
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Spatial resolution of EEG cortical source imaging revealed by localization of retinotopic organization in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Chang-Hwan Im; Arvind Gururajan; Nanyin Zhang; Wei Chen; Bin He
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Posterior cingulate and retrosplenial cortex connections of the caudal superior temporal region in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  Benjamin Seltzer; Deepak N Pandya
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  ECoG gamma activity during a language task: differentiating expressive and receptive speech areas.

Authors:  Vernon L Towle; Hyun-Ah Yoon; Michael Castelle; J Christopher Edgar; Nadia M Biassou; David M Frim; Jean-Paul Spire; Michael H Kohrman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Characterizing response to elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Functional localization of auditory cortical fields of human: click-train stimulation.

Authors:  John F Brugge; Igor O Volkov; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Richard A Reale; Albert Fenoy; Mitchell Steinschneider; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.