Literature DB >> 2522525

Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not?

A Koriat1, J Norman.   

Abstract

Past research has shown that speed of identifying single letters or digits is largely indifferent to orientation, whereas the recognition of single words or connected text is markedly disrupted by disorientation. In a series of four experiments, we attempted to reconcile these findings. The results suggest that disorientation does not impair the identification of the characters but disrupts the perception of their spatial arrangement. When spatial order information is critical for distinguishing between different stimuli, disorientation is disruptive because some rectification process is required to restore order information. Utilizing the similarity between the letter B and the number 13, we found strong effects of orientation when a stimulus was interpreted as the two-digit number 13 but not when interpreted as the single letter B. This, however, occurred only when the set of numbers to be classified included permutations of the same digits (Experiments 1 and 2). Odd-even decisions on single-digit and two-digit numbers (Experiment 3) yielded strong effects of stimulus orientation for order-dependent numbers (e.g., 32), weaker effects for order-independent numbers (e.g., 24), and none for repeated-digit (e.g., 22) or single-digit numbers. Classification time for two-letter Hebrew words evidenced strong effects of orientation for words that differed only in letter order but much weaker effects for words that had no letters in common, even when these were embedded within some words that did (Experiment 4).

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2522525     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.1.153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  Image rotation of misoriented letter strings: effects of orientation cuing and repetition.

Authors:  K Jordan; L A Huntsman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

2.  On the process of recognizing inverted words: does it rely only on orientation-invariant cues?

Authors:  David Navon; Ofra Raveh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

3.  A masked priming ERP study of letter processing using single letters and false fonts.

Authors:  Priya Mitra; Donna Coch
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Learning to read vertical text in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Ahalya Subramanian; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Harrison Wagoner; Deyue Yu
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Morpheme Transposition of Two-Character Chinese Words in Vertical Visual Fields.

Authors:  Hong-Wen Cao; Cheng Chen; Hong-Mei Yan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-01-04

6.  Sensory factors limiting horizontal and vertical visual span for letter recognition.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Wagoner; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Tilted letters and tilted words: a possible role for principal axes in visual word recognition.

Authors:  J Driver; G C Baylis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-09

8.  Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects.

Authors:  J E Murray; P Jolicoeur; P A McMullen; M Ingleton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-09

9.  The role of attention in the shift from orientation-dependent to orientation-invariant identification of disoriented objects.

Authors:  J E Murray
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-01

10.  Influence of imaging ability on word transformation.

Authors:  P A Allen; B Wallace; F Loschiavo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.