Literature DB >> 19403897

A masked priming ERP study of letter processing using single letters and false fonts.

Priya Mitra1, Donna Coch.   

Abstract

Previous event-related potential (ERP) research on letter processing has suggested that a P150 reflects low-level, featural processing, whereas a P260 reflects high-level, abstract letter processing. In order to investigate the specificity of these effects, ERPs were recorded in a masked priming paradigm using matching and nonmatching pairs of letters (e.g., g-g, g-j) and false fonts (e.g.,[SYMBOL: SEE TEXT], [SYMBOL: SEE TEXT]). If the P150 priming effect indexes featural processing, there should be no effect of condition on the P150, since the letters and false fonts shared visual features. If the P260 priming effect indexes the processing of abstract letter representations, it should be evident only in the letter condition. As was expected, the P150 priming effect was similar for letters and false fonts; however, the P260 priming effect was also similar between conditions. Thus, the P260 priming effect may not be sensitive to abstract letter processing per se, or such processing may be extremely abstract.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19403897     DOI: 10.3758/CABN.9.2.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  54 in total

1.  Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not?

Authors:  A Koriat; J Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Automatic word form processing in masked priming: an ERP study.

Authors:  Giordana Grossi; Donna Coch
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  An early electrophysiological response associated with expertise in letter perception.

Authors:  Alan C N Wong; Isabel Gauthier; Brion Woroch; Casey DeBuse; Tim Curran
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Letter processing in the visual system: different activation patterns for single letters and strings.

Authors:  Karin H James; Thomas W James; Gael Jobard; Alan C N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Severe developmental letter-processing impairment: A treatment case study.

Authors:  Ruth Brunsdon; Max Coltheart; Lyndsey Nickels
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Congruency factors related to visual confusion of English letters.

Authors:  P Dunn-Rankin; D A Leton; V F Shelton
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1968-04

7.  Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet.

Authors:  M J Gervais; L O Harvey; J O Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Evoked potentials by letters in printed and script forms.

Authors:  L Mecacci; D Salmaso
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1984-08

9.  Application of geometric models to letter recognition: distance and density.

Authors:  I B Appelman; M S Mayzner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1982-03

10.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe.

Authors:  A C Nobre; T Allison; G McCarthy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  The time course of visual influences in letter recognition.

Authors:  Sylvain Madec; Kévin Le Goff; Stéphanie K Riès; Thierry Legou; Guillaume Rousselet; Pierre Courrieu; F-Xavier Alario; Jonathan Grainger; Arnaud Rey
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Behavioral and ERP evidence of word and pseudoword superiority effects in 7- and 11-year-olds.

Authors:  Donna Coch; Priya Mitra; Elyse George
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.252

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.