Literature DB >> 7968552

Influence of imaging ability on word transformation.

P A Allen1, B Wallace, F Loschiavo.   

Abstract

In the present study, we examined whether individual differences in imaging ability affect visual word recognition. Poor and vivid imagers performed a naming task that involved nonreversed (e.g., JUMP) and reversed (e.g., PMUJ) words (Experiment 1). Poor and vivid imagers were also tested on a naming task that was controlled for verbal ability; all the words were reversed and presentation time was varied (Experiment 2). In both experiments, imaging ability interacted with task difficulty, suggesting that individual differences in imaging ability affect visual word recognition. Specifically, the present data suggest that poor imagers may be less efficient than vivid imagers at processing words analytically. The data are interpreted within a limited-capacity, hybrid, word recognition model, in which words can be processed as either word-level or letter-level codes.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7968552     DOI: 10.3758/bf03198395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  17 in total

1.  Effect of imagery ability on letter-level and word-level processing.

Authors:  P A Allen; B Wallace; E Waag
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

2.  Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not?

Authors:  A Koriat; J Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Adult age differences in letter-level and word-level processing.

Authors:  P A Allen; D J Madden; L C Crozier
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1991-06

4.  Evidence for a parallel input serial analysis model of word processing.

Authors:  P A Allen; D J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters.

Authors:  N F Johnson; P A Allen; T L Strand
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-07

6.  Reading rotated words.

Authors:  A Koriat; J Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures.

Authors:  D F Marks
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1973-02

8.  Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings.

Authors:  D W Massaro; R L Venezky; G A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1979-03

9.  Investigating the boundaries of reading units: letter detection in misspelled words.

Authors:  A F Healy; A Drewnowski
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Enhanced visual memory during hypnosis as mediated by hypnotic responsiveness and cognitive strategies.

Authors:  Helen J Crawford; Steven N Allen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1983-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Searching for target letters in memory: Individual preferences and instructions for text representation.

Authors:  V I Schneider; A F Healy; D J Steinhart
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.