Literature DB >> 27704159

Current state of the art in total knee arthroplasty computer navigation.

Frederic Picard1, Kamal Deep2, Jean Yves Jenny3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Computer-assisted surgery in orthopaedics is passing through the initial adapter phase of technology adoption. It started more than 20 years ago, but the uptake of technology is still not widespread. The purpose of this article is to introduce the reader to the basic technology and familiarize with the terminology used in the computer navigation.
METHODS: During this time, the technology has matured and we have the evidence to prove its benefits for patients. Not only does it help placing the prosthetic components in correct orientation, it also helps with other parameters like blood loss and fat embolism reduction. In addition to being a teaching and training tool, it has also opened new areas of research which now question the traditional practices. Since it is not in commonly used, the basic aspects of computer navigation are not very well known.
RESULTS: This paper outlines some important definitions and restates the classification of navigation within the spectrum of computer-assisted technologies; it then elaborates on the key principles behind navigation in knee arthroplasty and goes through some of the differences between navigation systems. Finally, it describes in some detail the surgical steps with an image-free knee navigation system.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted navigation is not mainstream yet, but this article should help readers unfamiliar with the technology to understand the basic terms and how it actually works. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer; Computer-assisted surgery; Image-based; Image-free; Knee replacement; Navigation; Registration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27704159     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4337-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  51 in total

1.  Comparative tracking error analysis of five different optical tracking systems.

Authors:  R Khadem; C C Yeh; M Sadeghi-Tehrani; M R Bax; J A Johnson; J N Welch; E P Wilkinson; R Shahidi
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-12-01

3.  Blood loss following total knee replacement is reduced when using computer-assisted versus standard methods.

Authors:  Jamie McConnell; John Dillon; Andrew Kinninmonth; Martin Sarungi; Frederic Picard
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.500

4.  What should the surgeon aim for when performing computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Geert Van Damme; Koen Defoort; Yves Ducoulombier; Francis Van Glabbeek; Johan Bellemans; Jan Victor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Surgical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a perspective.

Authors:  Robert A Siston; Nicholas J Giori; Stuart B Goodman; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery?: A prospective, randomised, clinical trial.

Authors:  Y Kalairajah; A J Cossey; G M Verrall; G Ludbrook; A J Spriggins
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-02

7.  A cadaveric study to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in locating the hip center during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Frederic Picard; Francois Leitner; Alberto Gregori; Philippe Martin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 8.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Computer-assisted surgery simulations and directed practice of total knee arthroplasty: educational benefits to the trainee.

Authors:  C A Myden; C Anglin; G D Kopp; C R Hutchison
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2012

10.  Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years?

Authors:  Peter F Sharkey; Paul M Lichstein; Chao Shen; Anthony T Tokarski; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinico-Radiological and Functional Results of the Navigated Gradius (Gradually Reducing Radius) Knee Prosthesis at Short to Mid-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Mrinal Sharma; Bharat Dhanjani; Jibran Bashir; Anshu Kumar Anshu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 1.251

2.  Computer assisted navigation in total knee and hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kamal Deep; Shivakumar Shankar; Ashish Mahendra
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-07-28

3.  Articular surface mounted navigated total knee arthroplasty improves the reliability of component alignment.

Authors:  N D Clement; D MacDonald; A G Burgess; C R Howie
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Robotic- and orthosensor-assisted versus manual (ROAM) total knee replacement: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nick D Clement; Michelle Bardgett; Steven Galloway; Y Jenny Baron; Karen Smith; David J Weir; David J Deehan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.