Literature DB >> 25216375

Enhancing generalisation in biofeedback intervention using the challenge point framework: a case study.

Elaine R Hitchcock1, Tara McAllister Byun.   

Abstract

Biofeedback intervention can help children achieve correct production of a treatment-resistant error sound, but generalisation is often limited. This case study suggests that generalisation can be enhanced when biofeedback intervention is structured in accordance with a "challenge point" framework for speech-motor learning. The participant was an 11-year-old with residual /r/ misarticulation who had previously attained correct /r/ production through a structured course of ultrasound biofeedback treatment but did not generalise these gains beyond the word level. Treatment difficulty was adjusted in an adaptive manner following predetermined criteria for advancing, maintaining, or moving back a level in a multidimensional hierarchy of functional task complexity. The participant achieved and maintained virtually 100% accuracy in producing /r/ at both word and sentence levels. These preliminary results support the efficacy of a semi-structured implementation of the challenge point framework as a means of achieving generalisation and maintenance of treatment gains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofeedback; challenge-point framework; generalisation; principles of motor learning; speech sound disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25216375      PMCID: PMC4276132          DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2014.956232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  19 in total

1.  The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and its Nebraska replication.

Authors:  A B Smit; L Hand; J J Freilinger; J E Bernthal; A Bird
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1990-11

2.  Speech habilitation of hard of hearing adolescents using electropalatography and ultrasound as evaluated by trained listeners.

Authors:  Barbara Bernhardt; Bryan Gick; Penelope Bacsfalvi; Julie Ashdown
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2003 Apr-May       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Development of [j] in young, midwestern, American children.

Authors:  Richard S McGowan; Susan Nittrouer; Carol J Manning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Long-term outcomes of speech therapy for seven adolescents with visual feedback technologies: ultrasound and electropalatography.

Authors:  Penelope Bacsfalvi; Barbara May Bernhardt
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 5.  Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders.

Authors:  Edwin Maas; Donald A Robin; Shannon N Austermann Hula; Skott E Freedman; Gabriele Wulf; Kirrie J Ballard; Richard A Schmidt
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: extensions and reliability data.

Authors:  L D Shriberg; D Austin; B A Lewis; J L McSweeny; D L Wilson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Ultrasound biofeedback for speech training. Instrumentation and preliminary results.

Authors:  T H Shawker; B C Sonies
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Visual feedback in treatment of residual phonological disorders.

Authors:  D M Ruscello
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 9.  Five subtypes of developmental phonological disorders.

Authors:  L D Shriberg
Journal:  Clin Commun Disord       Date:  1994-03

10.  Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Elaine R Hitchcock; Michelle T Swartz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  17 in total

1.  Limited acquisition and generalisation of rhotics with ultrasound visual feedback in childhood apraxia.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Edwin Maas; Jessica Whittle; Megan C Leece; Patricia McCabe
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Remediating Residual Rhotic Errors With Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Treatment: A Single-Case Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie Sihyun Kim; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Acquisition, retention, and generalization of rhotics with and without ultrasound visual feedback.

Authors:  Greta M Sjolie; Megan C Leece; Jonathan L Preston
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 4.  Tutorial: Motor-Based Treatment Strategies for /r/ Distortions.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Nina R Benway; Megan C Leece; Elaine R Hitchcock; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Masked Visual Analysis: Minimizing Type I Error in Visually Guided Single-Case Design for Communication Disorders.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Elaine R Hitchcock; John Ferron
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Enhancing Intervention for Residual Rhotic Errors Via App-Delivered Biofeedback: A Case Study.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Heather Campbell; Helen Carey; Wendy Liang; Tae Hong Park; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  Tutorial: Speech Motor Chaining Treatment for School-Age Children With Speech Sound Disorders.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece; Jaclyn Storto
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Motor-based treatment with and without ultrasound feedback for residual speech-sound errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 9.  The Articulatory Phonetics of /r/ for Residual Speech Errors.

Authors:  Suzanne E Boyce
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.761

10.  Social, Emotional, and Academic Impact of Residual Speech Errors in School-Aged Children: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Elaine R Hitchcock; Daphna Harel; Tara McAllister Byun
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.