Literature DB >> 25213223

Prenatal diagnosis: do prospective parents have the right not to know?

Anna Karolina Sierawska1.   

Abstract

Prenatal diagnosis (PND) challenges the issue of parental autonomy. Two ethical aspects of the parental decision making process with reference to PND have been taken into consideration: the duty to know and the right not to know. Whilst the first approach has been widely discussed in literature, the latter seems to be overlooked. In order to find good moral reasons supporting the right not to know, firstly the duty to know approach was critically analysed. Subsequently, the emphasis was put on the unconditional parental love and the issue of child's best interests as the features supporting parental right not to know. The clarification of what is good parenthood was presented as the best normative approach supporting the parental right not to know in case of PND. Apart from parental autonomy, raising the question of the right not to know is important in the debate about the place and role of people with disabilities in society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25213223     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-014-9591-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  17 in total

1.  Genetic ignorance, moral obligations and social duties.

Authors:  T Takala; M Häyry
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2000-02

2.  Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far?

Authors:  Richard Johanson; Mary Newburn; Alison Macfarlane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-13

3.  Is there a "right not to be born"? Reproductive decision making, options and the right to information.

Authors:  Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 4.  New genetic testing in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Natalia Babkina; John M Graham
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Ethical and legal aspects of noninvasive prenatal genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Bernard M Dickens
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Suzanne G M Frints; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: nutrition and lifestyle for a healthy pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Sandra B Procter; Christina G Campbell
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  The moral status of preembryos, embryos, fetuses, and infants.

Authors:  C Strong
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1997-10

9.  The right not to know: an autonomy based approach.

Authors:  R Andorno
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Right not to know or duty to know? Prenatal screening for polycystic renal disease.

Authors:  R Kielstein; H M Sass
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1992-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  All in the family.

Authors:  Bert Gordijn; Henk Ten Have
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2020-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.