Literature DB >> 24299974

Ethical and legal aspects of noninvasive prenatal genetic diagnosis.

Bernard M Dickens1.   

Abstract

The new technology that will allow genetic testing of a fetus within the first trimester of pregnancy by isolating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in the mother's blood raises a range of ethical and legal issues. Considered noninvasive, this test is safe and reliable, and may avoid alternative genetic testing by amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling, which risks causing spontaneous abortion. Ethical and legal issues of cffDNA testing will become more acute if testing expands to fetal whole-genome sequencing. Critical issues include the state of the science or diagnostic art; the appropriateness of offering the test; the implications of denying the test when it is available and appropriate; disclosure and counseling following test results; and management of patients' choices on acquiring test results. A challenge will be providing patients with appropriate counseling based on up-to-date genetic knowledge, and accommodating informed patients' legal choices.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell-free fetal DNA testing; Ethics of fetal testing; Fetal genetic diagnosis; Genetic counseling; Noninvasive fetal testing; Termination of pregnancy; Whole-genome sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24299974     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  7 in total

1.  Old Questions, New Paradigms: Ethical, Legal, and Social Complications of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; Megan Allyse
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-01-01

Review 2.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

3.  Prenatal diagnosis: do prospective parents have the right not to know?

Authors:  Anna Karolina Sierawska
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-05

4.  NIPT and Informed Consent: an Assessment of Patient Understanding of a Negative NIPT Result.

Authors:  Julie L Piechan; Karrie A Hines; Daniel L Koller; Kristyne Stone; Kimberly Quaid; Wilfredo Torres-Martinez; Divya Wilson Mathews; Tatiana Foroud; Lola Cook
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  "I think we've got too many tests!": Prenatal providers' reflections on ethical and clinical challenges in the practice integration of cell-free DNA screening.

Authors:  B L Gammon; S A Kraft; M Michie; M Allyse
Journal:  Ethics Med Public Health       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

Review 6.  Too much, too soon?: Commercial provision of noninvasive prenatal screening for subchromosomal abnormalities and beyond.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Subhashini Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Mollie A Minear; Elisa Berson; Shilpa Sridhar; Margaret Rote; Anthony Hung; Subhashini Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-01-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.