Literature DB >> 9360198

The moral status of preembryos, embryos, fetuses, and infants.

C Strong1.   

Abstract

Some have argued that embryos and fetuses have the moral status of personhood because of certain criteria that are satisfied during gestation. However, these attempts to base personhood during gestation on intrinsic characteristics have uniformly been unsuccessful. Within a secular framework, another approach to establishing a moral standing for embryos and fetuses is to argue that we ought to confer some moral status upon them. There appear to be two main approaches to defending conferred moral standing; namely, consequentialist and contractarian arguments. This article puts forward a consequentialist argument for the conferred moral standing of preembryos, embryos, fetuses, and infants. It states and defends an original version of the commonly-held view that moral standing increases during gestation. It also explores the implications of this viewpoint for several issues: what is involved in showing 'respect' for preembryos; and whether it is permissible to create preembryos solely for research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9360198     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/22.5.457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  7 in total

1.  Hope in the neonatal intensive care nursery: values, ethics, and the injury of continued existence.

Authors:  Eike-Henner W Kluge
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-09-27

2.  Ethical dilemmas in oncofertility: an exploration of three clinical scenarios.

Authors:  Clarisa R Gracia; Jorge J E Gracia; Shasha Chen
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2010

3.  A Capabilities Approach to Prenatal Screening for Fetal Abnormalities.

Authors:  Greg Stapleton; Wybo Dondorp; Peter Schröder-Bäck; Guido de Wert
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2019-12

4.  The genetic technologies questionnaire: lay judgments about genetic technologies align with ethical theory, are coherent, and predict behaviour.

Authors:  Svenja Küchenhoff; Johannes Doerflinger; Nora Heinzelmann
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 2.834

5.  Ethics of refusing parental requests to withhold or withdraw treatment from their premature baby.

Authors:  R J Boyle; R Salter; M W Arnander
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Prenatal diagnosis: do prospective parents have the right not to know?

Authors:  Anna Karolina Sierawska
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-05

7.  Look at that!-The effect pictures have on consumer preferences for in ovo gender determination as an alternative to culling male chicks.

Authors:  Corrina Reithmayer; Michael Danne; Oliver Mußhoff
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.