Literature DB >> 12794694

US physicians' attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

A N Freedman1, L Wideroff, L Olson, W Davis, C Klabunde, K P Srinath, B B Reeve, R T Croyle, R Ballard-Barbash.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for an inherited susceptibility to cancer is an emerging technology in medical practice. Little information is currently available about physicians' attitudes toward these tests. To assess US physicians' opinions on unresolved issues surrounding genetic testing, a 15-min survey was administered to a stratified random sample of 1,251 physicians from 8 specialties, selected from a file of all licensed physicians in the US (response rate = 71.0%). Dependent measures included physicians' attitudes toward genetic counseling and testing qualifications, availability of guidelines, patient confidentiality and insurance discrimination issues, and clinical utility of genetic tests. More than 89% of physicians reported a need for physician guidelines, 81% thought that patients with positive genetic test results are at risk for insurance discrimination, and more than 53% thought that it was difficult to ensure the confidentiality of test results. Almost 25% indicated that genetic tests for cancer susceptibility have too many inaccurate or ambiguous results; nearly 75% thought that clear guidelines are not available for managing patients with positive test results. Only 29% of physicians reported feeling qualified to provide genetic counseling to their patients. More than 84% of oncologists considered themselves qualified to recommend genetic testing to their patients compared with 40% of primary care physicians (PCPs), and 57% of tertiary care physicians (TCPs). US physicians expressed great uncertainty about issues surrounding genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Results of this national survey underscore the need to provide physicians with clear guidelines on the use of genetic cancer susceptibility tests and effective medical training on their appropriate implementation. Published 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12794694     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  71 in total

1.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Genetic Testing and Genetic Counselors in Jordan: A Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Majd Soubani; Lana Abu Salem; Haneen Saker; Muayyad Ahmad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  How to establish a high-risk cancer genetics clinic: limitations and successes.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Beth Stearman; Agnes Masny; Elaine Sein; Susan Mazzoni
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Interactive genetic counseling role-play: a novel educational strategy for family physicians.

Authors:  Sean M Blaine; June C Carroll; Andrea L Rideout; Gord Glendon; Wendy Meschino; Cheryl Shuman; Deanna Telner; Natasha Van Iderstine; Joanne Permaul
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Challenges to the translation of genomic information into clinical practice and health policy: Utilization, preferences and economic value.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Stephanie Van Bebber
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2008-06

5.  Consumer awareness and attitudes about insurance discrimination post enactment of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.

Authors:  Dawn C Allain; Sue Friedman; Leigha Senter
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Genetic education for primary care providers: improving attitudes, knowledge, and confidence.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Andrea L Rideout; Brenda J Wilson; Judith Md Allanson; Sean M Blaine; Mary Jane Esplen; Sandra A Farrell; Gail E Graham; Jennifer MacKenzie; Wendy Meschino; Fiona Miller; Preeti Prakash; Cheryl Shuman; Anne Summers; Sherry Taylor
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Cancer genetic risk assessment and referral patterns in primary care.

Authors:  Hetal S Vig; Joanne Armstrong; Brian L Egleston; Carla Mazar; Michele Toscano; Angela R Bradbury; Mary B Daly; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-12

8.  The process of deciding about prophylactic surgery for breast and ovarian cancer: Patient questions, uncertainties, and communication.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Wendy Chung
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Referral patterns of Indiana oncologists for colorectal cancer genetic services.

Authors:  Jessica Claybrook; Cindy Hunter; Leah Flury Wetherill; Gail H Vance
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Evolving perspectives on genetic discrimination in health insurance among health care providers.

Authors:  Carin R Huizenga; Katrina Lowstuter; Kimberly C Banks; Veronica I Lagos; Virginia O Vandergon; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.