Literature DB >> 25207076

Comparison of Size 2 LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ in Spontaneously Breathing Children: a Randomised Clinical Trial.

Zehra İpek Arslan1, Canan Balcı1, Duygu Akalın Oysu1, Mehmet Yılmaz1, Necla Gürbüz2, Zekeriya Ilce2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare size 2 Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal and size 2 Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme in spontaneously breathing children undergoing lower abdominal elective surgery of <1 hour duration. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty children aged 1-7 years, weighing 10-20 kg, ASA I physical status were randomly allocated to the Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme.
RESULTS: There were no differences in demographic variables, ease of gastric tube placement, ease of insertion and ventilation, number of insertion attempts, hemodynamic changes on insertion, postoperative complications and bloodstaining between the groups. Gastric insufflation was detected and gastric tube was placed in all patients except one in LMA Supreme. Postoperative cuff volumes were comparable with the preoperative values in group itself. Oropharyngeal leak pressures were higher in Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal (24.6±5.5 vs 21.3±4.2, respectively; p<0.01).
CONCLUSION: As a result Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme can safely be used in spontaneously breathing pediatric population undergoing lower abdominal elective surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laryngeal mask; children; oropharyngeal leak pressure; proseal; supreme

Year:  2013        PMID: 25207076      PMCID: PMC4116025          DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Balkan Med J        ISSN: 2146-3123            Impact factor:   2.021


  16 in total

1.  Gastric insufflation with the ProSeal laryngeal mask.

Authors:  J Brimacombe; C Keller; A Berry
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  A randomised trial comparing the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ with the laryngeal mask airway Unique™ in children.

Authors:  N Jagannathan; L E Sohn; A Sawardekar; E Chang; K E Langen; K Anderson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery.

Authors:  Rakhee Goyal; Ravindra Nath Shukla; Gaurav Kumar
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.556

4.  [Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade].

Authors:  David R R Lardner; Robin G Cox; Alastair Ewen; Darren Dickinson
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Nitrous oxide diffusion into the cuffs of disposable laryngeal mask airways.

Authors:  P Maino; A Dullenkopf; V Bernet; M Weiss
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients.

Authors:  K Goldmann; C Jakob
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children.

Authors:  M Lopez-Gil; J Brimacombe
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.556

8.  A cohort evaluation of the pediatric ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 100 children.

Authors:  Fiona Kelly; Steven Sale; Guy Bayley; Tim Cook; Peter Stoddart; Michelle White
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 2.556

9.  Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients.

Authors:  T M Cook; J J Gatward; J Handel; R Hardy; C Thompson; R Srivastava; P A Clarke
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.

Authors:  H Shimbori; K Ono; T Miwa; N Morimura; M Noguchi; K Hiroki
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparing the Laryngeal Mask Airway, Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway and Face Mask in Children Airway Management.

Authors:  Beyza Tekin; Zehra Hatipoğlu; Mediha Türktan; Dilek Özcengiz
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-04-01

2.  Comparison of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size 2 and 2½ in anesthetized and paralyzed pediatric patients with same weight group: A prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Reena Mahajan; Susheela Taxak
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.