Literature DB >> 15725321

The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children.

M Lopez-Gil1, J Brimacombe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ProSeal (PLMA) is a new laryngeal mask device with a modified cuff to improve the seal and a drain tube to provide access to the gastrointestinal tract. We assessed the performance of the size 2 (which has no dorsal cuff) and size 3 (which has a dorsal cuff) in terms of insertion success, efficacy of seal, tidal volume, gas exchange, fiberoptic position, gastric tube placement and frequency of problems.
METHODS: Eighty children undergoing minor surgery were studied (n = 40, size 2 PLMA, weight 10-25 kg; n = 40, size 3 PLMA, weight >25-50 kg). Induction was with remifentanil and propofol. Insertion was with the introducer tool and by experienced users. Maintenance was with propofol or sevoflurane and pressure controlled ventilation.
RESULTS: The first-time and overall insertion success rate was 84 and 100%, respectively. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was 31 +/- 5 cmH2O. There were no gastric or drain tube air leaks. Tidal volume and gas exchange was adequate in all patients, other than two brief episodes of hypoxia because of airway reflex activation. The vocal cords and epiglottis were visible in 99 and 80%, respectively, via the airway tube. The first-time and overall insertion success rate for gastric tube insertion was 87 and 100%, respectively. During maintenance, the PLMA was removed in one patient with airway reflex activation and another required epinephrine for bronchospasm. There were no differences in performance between the sizes 2 and 3 PLMA.
CONCLUSION: The PLMA is an effective airway device in children and isolates the glottis from the esophagus when correctly positioned. Despite the lack of a dorsal cuff, the performance of the size 2 was similar to the size 3 PLMA in the age groups tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15725321     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01427.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in infants.

Authors:  Eyyup Sabri Ozden; Basak Ceyda Meco; Zekeriyya Alanoglu; Neslihan Alkıs
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.363

2.  [Use of the size 3 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Results of a randomized crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway].

Authors:  K Goldmann; C Roettger; H Wulf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery.

Authors:  Muhammad Qamarul Hoda; Khalid Samad; Hameed Ullah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-20

4.  An evaluation of the I-gel supraglottic airway in 70 pediatric patients.

Authors:  Tze Yeng Yeoh; Koo Boon Chan; Lynn S H Yeo; Eugene H C Liu; Terry L T Pan
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  [Clinical use of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask in infants, children and adolescents : prospective observational survey].

Authors:  K Goldmann; A Malik; C Hechtfischer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  A randomized comparison of the i-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: performance and fiberoptic findings.

Authors:  Aya Fukuhara; Ryu Okutani; Yutaka Oda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Comparison of Size 2 LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ in Spontaneously Breathing Children: a Randomised Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zehra İpek Arslan; Canan Balcı; Duygu Akalın Oysu; Mehmet Yılmaz; Necla Gürbüz; Zekeriya Ilce
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.021

8.  Effects of neuromuscular blocking agents on the clinical performance of i-gel® and surgical condition in elderly patients undergoing hand surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Choon-Kyu Cho; Minhye Change; Seok-Jin Lee; Tae-Yun Sung
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Size 2.5 ProSeal(™) LMA: Is it associated with increased attempts at insertion?

Authors:  Aparna Sinha; Bimla Sharma; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01

10.  The effect of head rotation on efficiency of ventilation and cuff pressure using the PLMA in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Hahck Soo Park; Jong In Han; Youn Jin Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.