Literature DB >> 18647270

A cohort evaluation of the pediatric ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 100 children.

Fiona Kelly1, Steven Sale, Guy Bayley, Tim Cook, Peter Stoddart, Michelle White.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) has been available in pediatric sizes in the UK since 2007. Although several non-UK studies have evaluated PLMAs in children, there are little published data regarding their use in this country. Having decided to introduce the pediatric PLMA into our practice, we chose to prospectively audit the first 100 uses as part of our clinical governance.
METHODS: We studied children undergoing elective surgery who were considered suitable for a supraglottic airway. We recorded patient, surgical and insertion details, device performance data and complications. Patient management was not altered by inclusion in this audit.
RESULTS: Twenty size 1.5, 55 size 2.0, 15 size 2.5 and 10 size 3.0 PLMAs were inserted in 100 consecutive children [median age 2 years (range 2 months to 10 years) and median weight 15 kg (range 4.9-60 kg)]. The overall first attempt success rate was 93% (size 1.5, 100%; size 2.0, 100%; size 2.5, 87%; size 3.0, 90%) and overall successful insertion rate was 99%. Median leak pressure was 25 cmH(2)O. Outright failure was seen in one patient; complications were seen in another six patients (partial airway obstruction in five patients and mild laryngospasm in one patient), all of whom were transient and none of whom required intubation. No episodes of regurgitation were recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: Even without prior experience and using nonconventional insertion, pediatric PLMAs (including size 1.5) can be easily inserted and provide an effective airway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18647270     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02705.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  6 in total

1.  Initial experience of the i-gel supraglottic airway by the residents in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Yukako Abukawa; Koichi Hiroki; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Comparison of clinical performance of size 1.5 Supreme™ LMA and Proseal™ LMA among Asian children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sook Hui Chaw; Ina I Shariffuddin; Li Lian Foo; Pui Kuan Lee; Ramona Maya Paran; Peak Chee Cheang; Lucy Chan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  An evaluation of the I-gel supraglottic airway in 70 pediatric patients.

Authors:  Tze Yeng Yeoh; Koo Boon Chan; Lynn S H Yeo; Eugene H C Liu; Terry L T Pan
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  A randomized comparison of the i-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: performance and fiberoptic findings.

Authors:  Aya Fukuhara; Ryu Okutani; Yutaka Oda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Comparison of Size 2 LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ in Spontaneously Breathing Children: a Randomised Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zehra İpek Arslan; Canan Balcı; Duygu Akalın Oysu; Mehmet Yılmaz; Necla Gürbüz; Zekeriya Ilce
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.021

6.  Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Maren Kleine-Brueggeney; Anne Gottfried; Sabine Nabecker; Robert Greif; Malte Book; Lorenz Theiler
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.