Literature DB >> 25205916

Zinc Finger Nucleases: A new era for transgenic animals.

John T Swarthout1, Manish Raisinghani2, Xiaoxia Cui2.   

Abstract

The rational engineering of eukaryotic genomes would facilitate the study of heritable changes in gene expression and offer enormous potential across basic research, drug-discovery, bioproduction and therapeutic development. A significant advancement toward this objective was achieved with the advent of a novel technology that enables high-frequency and high-fidelity genome editing via the application of custom designed zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs). A ZFN is a chimeric protein that consists of the non-specific endonuclease domain of FokI fused to a DNA-binding domain composed of an engineered zinc-finger motif. Within these chimeric proteins, the DNA binding specificity of the zinc finger protein determines the site of nuclease action. Once the engineered ZFNs recognize and bind to their specified locus, it leads to the dimerization of the two nuclease domains on the ZFNs to evoke a double-strand break (DSB) in the targeted DNA. The cell then employs the natural DNA repair processes of either non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR) to repair the targeted break. Due to the imperfect fidelity of NHEJ, a proportion of DSBs within a ZFN-treated cellular population will be misrepaired, leading to cells in which variable heterogeneous genetic insertions or deletions have been made at the target site. Alternatively, the HDR repair pathway enables precise insertion of a transgene or other defined alterations into the targeted region. By this approach, a donor template containing the transgene flanked by sequences that are homologous to the regions either side of the cleavage site is co-delivered into the cell along with the ZFNs. By creating a specific DSB, these cellular repair mechanisms are harnessed to generate precisely targeted genomic edits resulting in both cell lines and animal models with targeted gene deletions, integrations, or modifications. This review will discuss the development, mechanism of action, and applications of ZFN technology to genome engineering and the creation of animal models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal Models; Cell Lines; DNA Repair; Homologous Recombination; Non-homologous End Joining; Zinc Finger Nuclease

Year:  2011        PMID: 25205916      PMCID: PMC4117018          DOI: 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.1118109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurosci        ISSN: 0972-7531


Introduction

Living organisms are composed of a convoluted network of physiological systems presenting scientists with the daunting challenge of untangling this biological web. The process of deconvolution necessitates that we ask the appropriate questions, that experiments are well conceived and controlled, and that suitable model systems are available. Animal models facilitate our understanding of human physiology, help us acquire insight into disease pathology, and enable evaluation of novel therapeutic strategies for efficacy and safety prior to initiation of human trials. To ensure experimental success in a given animal model, it is essential to employ well-designed experiments and to use the most optimal animal models that closely mimic the human biology. This is especially critical in drug development where it is important to predict the true measure of a drug’s efficacy in order to reliably translate the results to the clinic. This is largely dependent upon the underlying biological system used for research and drug development rather than merely on the study or drug design. The challenge has been to successfully optimize the animal model that would provide construct, face and pharmacological validity. In order to proceed in a timely, efficient, and accurate manner in our pursuit of the development of more efficacious and safer drugs, there is a real need for novel animal models to gain a more complete understanding of disease pathophysiology and to facilitate more reproducible in vivo efficacy studies. As we discuss below, the advent of the zinc finger nuclease (ZFN) technology affords researchers the ability to create novel, and translationally relevant animal models by performing targeted genetic modifications.[1]

Model organisms and the zinc finger nuclease technology

True insight into the complex interactions underlying biological pathways and disease pathologies requires studying these processes in the context of biological systems. In the late 1980s, homologous recombination (HR)-based gene targeting in mouse embryonic stem (mES) cell was first achieved and quickly accepted as a revolutionary methodology for genome modification. As a result, the mouse became the most popular animal model system today. The immense impact it has since made on biomedical research won the technology the 2007 Nobel Prize on Physiology or Medicine.[2] While mice have proven to be a useful model and techniques have been developed for routine disruption of their genes, in many circumstances rats are considered a superior laboratory animal for studying and modeling human disease. Rats are more similar to humans physiologically and are a better model for human cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and arthritis; for autoimmune, neurological, behavioral and addiction disorders; as well as for neural regeneration, transplantation, and wound and bone healing.[3,4] In addition, rat models are excellent for testing the pharmacodynamics and toxicity of potential therapeutic compounds.[5] Finally, their larger size makes rats more conducive to study by instrumentation, and facilitates manipulation such as blood sampling, nerve conduction, and surgeries. An enormous effort has been mounted to establish a similar knockout rat approach by manipulating rat ES cells. Until recently, the creation of rat models required manipulation of the genome using ionizing radiation,[6] chemical-induced mutagenesis,[7-10] or mobile DNA (jumping gene) technology.[11,12] However, the random nature of these mutations represents a major limitation to studying gene function. Random chemical mutagenesis using the alkylating agent N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) and mobile DNA technology using retrotransposons and transposons were the principle technologies used to generate knockout rat models and have been employed to generate mutant rat strains and potential disease models.[13,14] However, mutagenesis using ENU is time-consuming and expensive, creates a high frequency of random mutations, and mapping mutations responsible for a particular phenotype is often difficult.[8-10] Mobile DNA platforms permit random mutagenesis directly in the germ cells (sperm or oocytes) of mammalian model organisms, including rats, resulting in complete and stable gene disruptions at a high frequency. However, mutations are randomly disrupted throughout the entire genome and targeted genomic modulation is not possible.[11,12] In 2008 rat stem cells were successfully isolated[15,16] enabling the creation of a p53 knockout rat using HR.[17] While this is an important achievement, the ZFN-mediated gene knockout does not require the establishment of ES cell culture, but simply requires embryo isolation, injection, and implantation using well characterized protocols. Importantly, the ZFN method suggests a general solution to targeted gene knockout in other species. This is because many animal species have embryo-manipulation methods robust enough to support the creation of transgenic animals, but do not have protocols for the establishment of ES cell culture. The ZFN technology provides a means for efficient and targeted mutagenesis of genomic DNA in both cells and embryos. This achievement spawned from the discovery and subsequent manipulation of zinc finger protein domains which, when combined with the non-specific cleavage domain of the Fok l endonuclease, culminated in the formation of ZFNs.[18] Engineered ZFNs are able to recognize and bind to a specified locus and evoke a double-stranded break (DSB) in the targeted DNA with high efficiency and base-pair precision. For targeted cleavage, two ZFN subunits (Figure 1) are designed that recognize the target sequence in a tail-to-tail conformation, with each monomer binding to half-sites that are separated by a 5-7 base pair spacer sequence.[19] The targeted DSB stimulates the cells endogenous DNA repair processes of either homology-directed repair (HDR) or non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) to heal the targeted break resulting in targeted integration or gene disruptions, respectively, at efficiencies in orders of magnitude higher than spontaneous homologous recombination.[20,21] ZFN technology brings promise for more flexible and efficient creation of animal models, including species that have lacked convenient genetic tools. Successful examples are targeted knockouts in both rats[22,23] and mice.[24,25] Furthermore, development is well under way for the creation of knockout animal models focused on application for neurobiology, cardiovascular biology, immunology, and toxicology, as well as the creation of models harboring targeted integrations (SAGETM Labs, St. Louis, MO). In 2009, a collaboration involving Sigma-Aldrich, Sangamo Biosciences, the Medical College of Wisconsin, OMT Inc., and INSERM resulting in the first targeted knockout rats generated via microinjection of ZFNs into single-cell embryos.[22] Guerts et al. used ZFNs to target the GFP sequence of a transgenic rat[26] and successfully knocked out the gene with no off-target effects. Turning to an endogenous rat gene, the team disrupted the Immunoglobulin M gene, and both disruptions were transmitted through the germline efficiently. A similar approach was taken for the generation of a knockout rat model for SCID[23] and targeted gene knockouts in mice,[24,25] demonstrating the applicability of the ZFN technology.

Neurodegenerative disorders and rat neural models

Many neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Schizophrenia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, display atypical protein assemblies or aggregates as well as induced cell death.[27,28] The therapeutic avenues available today either target the sympotomatology of the disorders, or induced significant side effects to preclude prolonged and continued administration. A paucity of optimal therapeutic avenues for a majority of neurodegenerative disorders stems from our lack of understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. The current knowledge about neurodegenerative disorders has been gleaned primarily from mouse models. However, arguably the neural circuitry in rats is more similar to humans and the stability of behavioral performance in the rats allows more reliable experimentation. The larger size of rats, in particular the brain and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) compartment, presents a technical advantage enabling availability of a larger amount of specimen for evaluation. The rats are also more amenable to surgical manipulations, allowing incorporation of newer tools like optogenetics to study the pathophysiology of neuronal disorders.[13]

Parkinson’s disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) belongs to a group of conditions called movement disorders and is a neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system that impairs motor skills and speech.[29] To date, there are no therapeutic interventions proven to halt or slow the progression of PD. The only option is the application of symptomatic therapies, such as dopamine supplementation used to offset the diminished dopaminergic output, but this type of treatment only alleviates the symptomatic motor dysfunction, not for the underlying pathology of PD.[30] Therefore, it is absolutely essential to create translationally relevant animal models for the development of new therapeutic strategies targeting the actual pathogenic process.[31] About 10% – 20% of patients are known to have monogenic forms of this disease[32] and the SAGE labs has partnered with the Michael J. Fox Foundation to perform targeted knockout in rats of several of these genes. The targeted genes include leucine rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2), Parkin (PARK2), DJ-1 (PARK7), and PTEN-induced novel kinase 1 (PINK1). Zinc Finger Nucleases are highly-specific genomic scissors. The Fok I domain must dimerize to achieve efficient DNA cleavage, requiring two ZFNs to bind at or near the cleavage site. The ZFNs only cut upon dimerization of the separate Fok I domains. By linking four zinc fingers in tandem for each of the two ZFNs, a combined recognition site of 24 base pairs is attained, specifying a unique address within the genome. These target sequences must be separated by 5-7 base pairs to allow formation of the catalytically active Fok I dimer. These positional constraints, therefore, drive a very high degree of specificity. The net result is a targeted double strand break that stimulates the cell endogenous repair machinery. A common feature to all of these genes is that an abnormality in the structure and/or function of the expressed proteins is implicated in the pathophysiology of PD. LRRK2 encodes a protein present largely in the cytoplasm but IT also associates with the mitochondrial outer membrane and is involved in MAPKK activation, cell death, and regulation of protein ubiquitination.[33,34] Autosomal-dominant LRRK mutations account for 5-6% of familial PD and 1-3% in sporadic PD, which collectively result in the most common cause of PD, making this an important model for the study of PD and apoptosis. PARK2 localizes to the cytoplasm in neurons of many regions of the brain. It is a component of a multiprotein E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that mediates the targeting of substrate proteins for proteasomal degradation and may help degrade proteins that are toxic to neurons. Autosomal-recessive mutations in PARK2 account for at least 50% of familial PD cases with roughly 20% of patients with PD having an onset before the age of 40 years.[35,36] The PINK1 protein kinase localizes to the mitochondria and is thought to protect cells from stress-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Autosomal-recessive mutations within this gene are the second most common form of PD, contributing to almost 1% - 7% of early-onset cases.[37] Finally, autosomal-recessive mutations in DJ-1 (PARK7) results in early-onset PD.[38] DJ-1 is a member of the peptidase C56 family of proteins that functions as a positive regulator of androgen receptor-dependent transcription.[39] Unfortunately, existing knockout mice models for PARK2, PINK1, and DJ-1 do not exhibit any major abnormality and fail to replicate the critical features of PD.[31] Consequently, there is a critical need for the development of translationally relevant animal models in the rat.

Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder clinically characterized by a progressive impairment in memory and cognition, and accounts for the vast majority of dementia patients.[40,41] AD is characterized by the accumulation of two proteins, amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau, as well as cortical atrophy. Amyloid beta is processed from amyloid precursor protein (APP) through the sequential cleavage by β- and γ-secretase.[42] Tau proteins function to stabilize microtubules and hyperphosphorylation of the protein resulting in the accumulation of intraneuronal inclusions known as neurofibrillary tangles. These two lesions are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of AD. As with PD, the available treatment options for AD patients are directed toward reducing the symptoms and delaying the progression, but there is no cure for either of two diseases. Existing mouse models have contributed significantly to our understanding of disease pathology. However, there are some significant limitations, including differences in the biology of AD pathogenesis between humans and mice, and the limitation of behavioral flexibility and stability for learning paradigms in mice. The smaller brain and CSF volume in mice limits optimal tissue harvest and collection of CSF for evaluation of the progress of the disease, especially in the context of chronic dosing paradigms. Furthermore, the larger brain of rats enables the surgical manipulations required to integrate novel neuroscience tools like optogenetics. SAGE Labs has pioneered several rat models to study AD which includes knockout lines for synuclein, apolipoprotein E (ApoE), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Alpha-synuclein, plays a role in synaptogenesis and organization, is believed to regulate dopamine and has been implicated in several neurodegenerative diseases including both PD and AD. Mutations within the gene are also present in some Alzheimer’s disease cases, making this model important for the study neurodegeneration. ApoE is expressed in the liver, intestines and brain where it is essential for the normal metabolism of lipids and preventing the accumulation of cholesterol-rich particles in plasma. ApoE exists in three different isoforms (E2, E3 and E4) and heterozygous and homozygous individuals for the APOE e4 allele, have approximately a 3- or 15-fold increased risk of developing AD compared with those that do not carry an e4 allele.[43] Widely studied for its role in cardiovascular disease and lipoprotein transport, it has more recently been implicated in Alzheimer’s disease and cognition, making this a useful model for the study of atherosclerosis, Alzheimer’s and nerve injury. BDNF is a neurotrophin that contributes to the growth and differentiation of neurons in the hippocampus, cortex and forebrain.[44,45] Deficiency in BDNF levels has been linked to a host of neurological diseases, including AD, depression, schizophrenia and dementia, making this an important model for studying the neurodegenerative disorders like AD.[46] In addition to targeted knockouts, SAGE Labs is using the ZFN technology to create rat lines over expressing APPswe/Indiana mutation, presenilin-1 mutation, and P301L tau mutation. Presenilin-1 is a component of γ-secretase which regulates APP processing. Therefore, the expression of transgenes encoding genes harboring any or these mutations will result in the formation of the characteristic lesions associated with AD.

Conclusions

ZFNs offer enormous potential across basic research, drug-discovery, bioproduction and therapeutic development, by facilitating the creation of gene knockouts and targeted integrations into more relevant backgrounds. ZFN-mediated genome editing can be used to generate novel animal models of disease that more closely mimic human disease, as well as providing more realistic data on the potential toxicity of drugs. Most importantly, the creation of knockout rats and mice using the ZFN technology does not require the establishment of ES cell culture and this fact provides a general solution for targeted gene knockout in other species. The extension of the ZFN technology for the creation of targeted gene knockouts or integrations in higher-level mammals will allow researchers to ask specific biological questions in the model systems most appropriate for their research.
  46 in total

1.  Laboratory animals: the Renaissance rat.

Authors:  Alison Abbott
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study.

Authors:  Cleusa P Ferri; Martin Prince; Carol Brayne; Henry Brodaty; Laura Fratiglioni; Mary Ganguli; Kathleen Hall; Kazuo Hasegawa; Hugh Hendrie; Yueqin Huang; Anthony Jorm; Colin Mathers; Paulo R Menezes; Elizabeth Rimmer; Marcia Scazufca
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Targeted genome modification in mice using zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Iara D Carbery; Diana Ji; Anne Harrington; Victoria Brown; Edward J Weinstein; Lucy Liaw; Xiaoxia Cui
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Genetic animal models of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Ted M Dawson; Han Seok Ko; Valina L Dawson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Direct demonstration of genetic alterations at the dihydrofolate reductase locus after gamma irradiation.

Authors:  L H Graf; L A Chasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Generation of knockout rats with X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) using zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Tomoji Mashimo; Akiko Takizawa; Birger Voigt; Kazuto Yoshimi; Hiroshi Hiai; Takashi Kuramoto; Tadao Serikawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mutations in the DJ-1 gene associated with autosomal recessive early-onset parkinsonism.

Authors:  Vincenzo Bonifati; Patrizia Rizzu; Marijke J van Baren; Onno Schaap; Guido J Breedveld; Elmar Krieger; Marieke C J Dekker; Ferdinando Squitieri; Pablo Ibanez; Marijke Joosse; Jeroen W van Dongen; Nicola Vanacore; John C van Swieten; Alexis Brice; Giuseppe Meco; Cornelia M van Duijn; Ben A Oostra; Peter Heutink
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Production of knockout rats using ENU mutagenesis and a yeast-based screening assay.

Authors:  Yunhong Zan; Jill D Haag; Kai-Shun Chen; Laurie A Shepel; Don Wigington; Yu-Rong Wang; Rong Hu; Christine C Lopez-Guajardo; Heidi L Brose; Katherine I Porter; Rachel A Leonard; Andrew A Hitt; Stacy L Schommer; Anu F Elegbede; Michael N Gould
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-05-18       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Generation of rat mutants using a coat color-tagged Sleeping Beauty transposon system.

Authors:  Baisong Lu; Aron M Geurts; Christophe Poirier; Deborah C Petit; Wilbur Harrison; Paul A Overbeek; Colin E Bishop
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 10.  Zinc finger nucleases: custom-designed molecular scissors for genome engineering of plant and mammalian cells.

Authors:  Sundar Durai; Mala Mani; Karthikeyan Kandavelou; Joy Wu; Matthew H Porteus; Srinivasan Chandrasegaran
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A history of genome editing in mammals.

Authors:  Almudena Fernández; Santiago Josa; Lluis Montoliu
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 2.  Genome centric engineering using ZFNs, TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 systems for trait improvement and disease control in Animals.

Authors:  Atif Khurshid Wani; Nahid Akhtar; Reena Singh; Ajit Prakash; Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza; Simona Cavalu; Chirag Chopra; Mahmoud Madkour; Ahmed Elolimy; Nesrein M Hashem
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 3.  Prion protein (PrP) gene-knockout cell lines: insight into functions of the PrP.

Authors:  Akikazu Sakudo; Takashi Onodera
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2015-01-15

4.  β-Eudesmol, an oxygenized sesquiterpene, stimulates appetite via TRPA1 and the autonomic nervous system.

Authors:  Kazuaki Ohara; Takafumi Fukuda; Yuko Ishida; Chika Takahashi; Rena Ohya; Mikio Katayama; Kunitoshi Uchida; Makoto Tominaga; Katsuya Nagai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Viable Mice with Extensive Gene Humanization (25-kbp) Created Using Embryonic Stem Cell/Blastocyst and CRISPR/Zygote Injection Approaches.

Authors:  Tiffany Leidy-Davis; Kai Cheng; Leslie O Goodwin; Judith L Morgan; Wen Chun Juan; Xavier Roca; S Tiong Ong; David E Bergstrom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.