Literature DB >> 26941961

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis guided Near Infrared Spectroscopy: Volumetric estimates of fibroglandular fraction and breast density from tomosynthesis reconstructions.

Srinivasan Vedantham1, Linxi Shi1, Kelly E Michaelsen2, Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy2, Brian W Pogue2, Steven P Poplack3, Andrew Karellas1, Keith D Paulsen4.   

Abstract

A multimodality system combining a clinical prototype digital breast tomosynthesis with its imaging geometry modified to facilitate near-infrared spectroscopic imaging has been developed. The accuracy of parameters recovered from near-infrared spectroscopy is dependent on fibroglandular tissue content. Hence, in this study, volumetric estimates of fibroglandular tissue from tomosynthesis reconstructions were determined. A kernel-based fuzzy c-means algorithm was implemented to segment tomosynthesis reconstructed slices in order to estimate fibroglandular content and to provide anatomic priors for near-infrared spectroscopy. This algorithm was used to determine volumetric breast density (VBD), defined as the ratio of fibroglandular tissue volume to the total breast volume, expressed as percentage, from 62 tomosynthesis reconstructions of 34 study participants. For a subset of study participants who subsequently underwent mammography, VBD from mammography matched for subject, breast laterality and mammographic view was quantified using commercial software and statistically analyzed to determine if it differed from tomosynthesis. Summary statistics of the VBD from all study participants were compared with prior independent studies. The fibroglandular volume from tomosynthesis and mammography were not statistically different (p=0.211, paired t-test). After accounting for the compressed breast thickness, which were different between tomosynthesis and mammography, the VBD from tomosynthesis was correlated with (r =0.809, p<0.001), did not statistically differ from (p>0.99, paired t-test), and was linearly related to, the VBD from mammography. Summary statistics of the VBD from tomosynthesis were not statistically different from prior studies using high-resolution dedicated breast computed tomography. The observation of correlation and linear association in VBD between mammography and tomosynthesis suggests that breast density associated risk measures determined for mammography are translatable to tomosynthesis. Accounting for compressed breast thickness is important when it differs between the two modalities. The fibroglandular volume from tomosynthesis reconstructions is similar to mammography indicating suitability for use during near-infrared spectroscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Density; Breast [A01.236]; Digital Breast Tomosynthesis; Mammography [E01.370.350.700.500]; Near-Infrared [E01.370.350.750]; Spectroscopy

Year:  2015        PMID: 26941961      PMCID: PMC4771071          DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/1/4/045202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express        ISSN: 2057-1976


  48 in total

1.  Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.

Authors:  Matthew G Wallis; Elin Moa; Federica Zanca; Karin Leifland; Mats Danielsson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Combining near-infrared tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to study in vivo breast tissue: implementation of a Laplacian-type regularization to incorporate magnetic resonance structure.

Authors:  Ben Brooksby; Shudong Jiang; Hamid Dehghani; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; John Weaver; Christine Kogel; Steven P Poplack
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Imaging breast adipose and fibroglandular tissue molecular signatures by using hybrid MRI-guided near-infrared spectral tomography.

Authors:  Ben Brooksby; Brian W Pogue; Shudong Jiang; Hamid Dehghani; Subhadra Srinivasan; Christine Kogel; Tor D Tosteson; John Weaver; Steven P Poplack; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Semi-automated segmentation and classification of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstructed images.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas; Kelly E Michaelsen; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

7.  Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Giulio Tagliafico; Davide Astengo; Francesca Cavagnetto; Raffaella Rosasco; Giuseppe Rescinito; Francesco Monetti; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Near-infrared spectral tomography integrated with digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of tissue scattering on optical data acquisition design.

Authors:  Kelly Michaelsen; Venkat Krishnaswamy; Brian W Pogue; Steven P Poplack; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Technical note: Skin thickness measurements using high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Linxi Shi; Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Avice M O'Connell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dedicated Breast CT: Feasibility for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Avice M O'Connell; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas; Alissa J Huston; Kristin A Skinner
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2014-11-29
View more
  5 in total

1.  Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Multimodal breast cancer imaging using coregistered dynamic diffuse optical tomography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bernhard B Zimmermann; Bin Deng; Bhawana Singh; Mark Martino; Juliette Selb; Qianqian Fang; Amir Y Sajjadi; Jayne Cormier; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; David A Boas; Mansi A Saksena; Stefan A Carp
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Calibration and optimization of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis guided near infrared spectral tomography.

Authors:  Kelly E Michaelsen; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Linxi Shi; Srinivasan Vedantham; Steven P Poplack; Andrew Karellas; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Effects of breast density and compression on normal breast tissue hemodynamics through breast tomosynthesis guided near-infrared spectral tomography.

Authors:  Kelly E Michaelsen; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Linxi Shi; Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Steven P Poplack
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Development of digital breast tomosynthesis and diffuse optical tomography fusion imaging for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Eun Young Chae; Hak Hee Kim; Sohail Sabir; Yejin Kim; Hyeongseok Kim; Sungho Yoon; Jong Chul Ye; Seungryong Cho; Duchang Heo; Kee Hyun Kim; Young Min Bae; Young-Wook Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.