Literature DB >> 29392158

Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer.

Michael A Pinkert1,2,3, Lonie R Salkowski4,3, Patricia J Keely5,6, Timothy J Hall3,6, Walter F Block3,4,6, Kevin W Eliceiri1,2,3,6.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide and ranks second in terms of overall cancer deaths. One of the difficulties associated with treating breast cancer is that it is a heterogeneous disease with variations in benign and pathologic tissue composition, which contributes to disease development, progression, and treatment response. Many of these phenotypes are uncharacterized and their presence is difficult to detect, in part due to the sparsity of methods to correlate information between the cellular microscale and the whole-breast macroscale. Quantitative multiscale imaging of the breast is an emerging field concerned with the development of imaging technology that can characterize anatomic, functional, and molecular information across different resolutions and fields of view. It involves a diverse collection of imaging modalities, which touch large sections of the breast imaging research community. Prospective studies have shown promising results, but there are several challenges, ranging from basic physics and engineering to data processing and quantification, that must be met to bring the field to maturity. This paper presents some of the challenges that investigators face, reviews currently used multiscale imaging methods for preclinical imaging, and discusses the potential of these methods for clinical breast imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; multimodal; multiscale; quantitative imaging

Year:  2018        PMID: 29392158      PMCID: PMC5777512          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.010901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  247 in total

Review 1.  Molecular-functional imaging of cancer: to image and imagine.

Authors:  Kristine Glunde; Arvind P Pathak; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 11.951

2.  Fine structure of breast tissue on micro computed tomography a feasibility study.

Authors:  Hubert Gufler; Folker Ernst Franke; Sabine Wagner; Wigbert Stephan Rau
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Image-guided sampling reveals increased stroma and lower glandular complexity in mammographically dense breast tissue.

Authors:  Suling J Lin; Jennifer Cawson; Prue Hill; Izhak Haviv; Mark Jenkins; John L Hopper; Melissa C Southey; Ian G Campbell; Erik W Thompson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Dedicated breast computed tomography: Basic aspects.

Authors:  Antonio Sarno; Giovanni Mettivier; Paolo Russo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Optical properties of biological tissues: a review.

Authors:  Steven L Jacques
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Design and demonstration of a microbiaxial optomechanical device for multiscale characterization of soft biological tissues with two-photon microscopy.

Authors:  Joseph T Keyes; Stacy M Borowicz; Jacob H Rader; Urs Utzinger; Mohamad Azhar; Jonathan P Vande Geest
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.127

7.  Standardized platform for coregistration of nonconcurrent diffuse optical and magnetic resonance breast images obtained in different geometries.

Authors:  Fred S Azar; Kijoon Lee; Ali Khamene; Regine Choe; Alper Corlu; Soren D Konecky; Frank Sauer; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 8.  Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis.

Authors:  Johanna A Joyce; Jeffrey W Pollard
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  Stromal characteristics may hold the key to mammographic density: the evidence to date.

Authors:  Alastair J Ironside; J Louise Jones
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-24

Review 10.  DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and MRS in Cancer: Challenges and Advantages of Implementing Qualitative and Quantitative Multi-parametric Imaging in the Clinic.

Authors:  Jessica M Winfield; Geoffrey S Payne; Alex Weller; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  3-D-Printed Registration Phantom for Combined Ultrasound and Optical Imaging of Biological Tissues.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Benjamin L Cox; Bing Dai; Timothy J Hall; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Platform for quantitative multiscale imaging of tissue composition.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Zachary J Simmons; Ryan C Niemeier; Bing Dai; Lauren B Woods; Timothy J Hall; Paul J Campagnola; Jeremy D Rogers; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Tissue density in the progression of breast cancer: Bedside to bench and back again.

Authors:  Emily Fabiano; Jian Zhang; Cynthia A Reinhart-King
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  The Venom of Philippine Tarantula (Theraphosidae) Contains Peptides with Pro-Oxidative and Nitrosative-Dependent Cytotoxic Activities against Breast Cancer Cells (MCF-7) In Vitro.

Authors:  Simon Miguel M Lopez; Jeremey S Aguilar; Jerene Bashia B Fernandez; Angelic Gayle J Lao; Mitzi Rain R Estrella; Mark Kevin P Devanadera; Anna Beatriz R Mayor; Leonardo A Guevarra; Myla R Santiago-Bautista; Olga M Nuneza; Librado Santiago
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-08-01

5.  Challenges of conducting quantitative ultrasound with a multimodal optical imaging system.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Timothy J Hall; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.609

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.